Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NMM vs TNK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
NMM vs TNK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $2.07B | $2.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.31B | $952M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $262M | $351M |
| Gross Margin | 56.7% | 27.5% |
| Operating Margin | 28.2% | 27.5% |
| Forward P/E | 4.8x | 6.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.42B | $55M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $270M | $831M |
NMM vs TNK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Navios Maritime Par… (NMM) | 100 | 1069.8 | +969.8% |
| Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) | 100 | 467.6 | +367.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NMM vs TNK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NMM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 2.1%, EPS growth -14.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.2%
- 267.2% 10Y total return vs TNK's 187.7%
- 2.1% revenue growth vs TNK's -22.6%
TNK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 2.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 2.7%, current ratio 7.98x
- Beta 0.35, yield 2.4%, current ratio 7.98x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.1% revenue growth vs TNK's -22.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.8x vs 6.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.9% margin vs NMM's 19.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs NMM's 0.72, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield, vs NMM's 0.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +99.4% vs TNK's +80.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.7% ROA vs NMM's 4.4%, ROIC 12.5% vs 8.3% |
NMM vs TNK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NMM vs TNK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NMM and TNK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NMM and TNK operate at a comparable scale, with $1.3B and $952M in trailing revenue. TNK is the more profitable business, keeping 36.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NMM's 19.9%. On growth, NMM holds the edge at +1.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $952M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $693M | $348M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $262M | $351M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $30M | $113M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.7% | +27.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +28.2% | +27.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.9% | +36.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +11.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.8% | -26.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -40.6% | +46.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NMM leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.0x trailing earnings, NMM trades at a 26% valuation discount to TNK's 8.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NMM's 4.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TNK's 6.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.1B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.2B | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.97x | 8.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.81x | 6.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.26x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.85x | 6.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.55x | 2.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.69x | 1.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 25.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TNK leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TNK delivers a 17.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $8 for NMM. TNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NMM's 0.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NMM scores 7/9 vs TNK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.1% | +17.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.4% | +15.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.3% | +12.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.0% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.2B | -$776M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $270M | $831M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.4B | $55M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.78x | 109.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NMM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TNK five years ago would be worth $61,384 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $22,051 for NMM. Over the past 12 months, NMM leads with a +99.4% total return vs TNK's +80.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NMM at 46.9% vs TNK's 33.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +39.4% | +58.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +99.4% | +80.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +216.8% | +136.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +120.5% | +513.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +267.2% | +187.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +46.9% | +33.2% |
Risk & Volatility
TNK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TNK is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NMM's 0.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TNK currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs NMM's 91.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 0.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $77.90 | $83.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.05 | $41.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.9% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.2 | 57.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 166K | 542K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NMM and TNK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NMM as "Hold" and TNK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 18.8% upside for NMM (target: $85) vs 10.7% for TNK (target: $90). For income investors, TNK offers the higher dividend yield at 2.44% vs NMM's 0.29%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $85.00 | $90.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.20 | $1.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | 0.0% |
NMM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). TNK leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
NMM vs TNK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NMM or TNK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Navios Maritime Partners L.
P. (NMM) is the stronger pick with 2. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 6% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK). Navios Maritime Partners L. P. (NMM) offers the better valuation at 6. 0x trailing P/E (4. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NMM or TNK?
On trailing P/E, Navios Maritime Partners L.
P. (NMM) is the cheapest at 6. 0x versus Teekay Tankers Ltd. at 8. 0x. On forward P/E, Navios Maritime Partners L. P. is actually cheaper at 4. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NMM or TNK?
Over the past 5 years, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) delivered a total return of +513. 8%, compared to +120. 5% for Navios Maritime Partners L. P. (NMM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NMM returned +267. 2% versus TNK's +187. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NMM or TNK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus Navios Maritime Partners L. P. 's 0. 72β — meaning NMM is approximately 106% more volatile than TNK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 46% for Navios Maritime Partners L. P. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NMM or TNK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Navios Maritime Partners L.
P. (NMM) is pulling ahead at 2. 1% versus -22. 6% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teekay Tankers Ltd. grew EPS -13. 0% year-over-year, compared to -14. 9% for Navios Maritime Partners L. P.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NMM leads at 23. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NMM or TNK?
Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 9% net margin versus 27. 5% for Navios Maritime Partners L. P. — meaning it keeps 36. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NMM leads at 33. 6% versus 22. 6% for TNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NMM leads at 66. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NMM or TNK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Navios Maritime Partners L.
P. (NMM) trades at 4. 8x forward P/E versus 6. 0x for Teekay Tankers Ltd. — 1. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NMM: 18. 8% to $85. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NMM or TNK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) offers the highest yield at 2. 4%, versus 0. 3% for Navios Maritime Partners L. P. (NMM).
09Is NMM or TNK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), 2. 4% yield, +187. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TNK: +187. 7%, NMM: +267. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NMM and TNK?
These companies operate in different sectors (NMM (Industrials) and TNK (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
TNK pays a dividend while NMM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.