NNDM
Nano Dimension Ltd.
Computer Hardware
Market Cap$389M
5Y Perf.-28.6%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
NNDM vs MTLS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
MTLS
Materialise N.V.
Software - Application
Market Cap$321M
5Y Perf.-78.4%
NNDM vs MTLS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | NNDM | MTLS |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Computer Hardware | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $389M | $321M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $118M | $279M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-338M | $7M |
| Gross Margin | 34.4% | 57.1% |
| Operating Margin | -61.8% | 2.9% |
| Forward P/E | 185.0x | 29.9x |
| Total Debt | $9M | $66M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $205M | $134M |
NNDM vs MTLS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
NNDM
MTLS
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) | 100 | 71.4 | -28.6% |
| Materialise N.V. (MTLS) | 100 | 21.6 | -78.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NNDM vs MTLS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: MTLS leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Nano Dimension Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
NNDM
Nano Dimension Ltd.
The Growth Play
NNDM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 77.3%, EPS growth -211.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.74, Low D/E 1.7%, current ratio 10.02x
- 77.3% revenue growth vs MTLS's -3.6%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
MTLS
Materialise N.V.
The Income Pick
MTLS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.29
- -19.3% 10Y total return vs NNDM's -97.5%
- Beta 1.29, current ratio 2.43x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | NNDM | 77.3% revenue growth vs MTLS's -3.6% |
| Value | MTLS | Lower P/E (29.9x vs 185.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | MTLS | 2.7% margin vs NNDM's -286.7% |
| Stability / Safety | MTLS | Beta 1.29 vs NNDM's 1.74 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | NNDM | +16.4% vs MTLS's +3.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MTLS | 1.8% ROA vs NNDM's -48.4%, ROIC 2.0% vs -15.2% |
NNDM vs MTLS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
Segment breakdown not available.
NNDM vs MTLS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLMTLSLAGGINGNNDM
NNDMNano Dimension Ltd.
1leads
MTLSMaterialise N.V.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs NNDMMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
MTLS4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
MTLS6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
NNDM5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
MTLS2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MTLS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MTLS is the larger business by revenue, generating $279M annually — 2.4x NNDM's $118M. MTLS is the more profitable business, keeping 2.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NNDM's -2.9%. On growth, NNDM holds the edge at +106.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | NNDMNano Dimension Lt… | MTLSMaterialise N.V. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $118M | $279M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$54M | $29M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$338M | $7M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$105M | $9M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.4% | +57.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -61.8% | +2.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | +2.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -89.2% | +3.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +106.4% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | +91.5% |
MTLS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NNDM and MTLS each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | NNDMNano Dimension Lt… | MTLSMaterialise N.V. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $389M | $321M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $194M | $242M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.35x | 35.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 185.00x | 29.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.80x | 1.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.72x | 1.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 29.92x |
Evenly matched — NNDM and MTLS each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MTLS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MTLS delivers a 3.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-59 for NNDM. NNDM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MTLS's 0.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MTLS scores 6/9 vs NNDM's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | NNDMNano Dimension Lt… | MTLSMaterialise N.V. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -58.7% | +3.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -48.4% | +1.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -15.2% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -12.6% | +1.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.26x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$195M | -$68M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $205M | $134M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $66M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -45.71x | 1.80x |
MTLS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NNDM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NNDM five years ago would be worth $2,774 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,031 for MTLS. Over the past 12 months, NNDM leads with a +16.4% total return vs MTLS's +3.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NNDM at -11.3% vs MTLS's -15.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | NNDMNano Dimension Lt… | MTLSMaterialise N.V. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.6% | -0.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.4% | +3.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.2% | -38.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.3% | -79.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.5% | -19.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.3% | -15.0% |
NNDM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MTLS is the less volatile stock with a 1.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NNDM's 1.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | NNDMNano Dimension Lt… | MTLSMaterialise N.V. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.74x | 1.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.32 | $6.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.31 | $4.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.7% | +80.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.6 | 62.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 83K |
MTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | NNDMNano Dimension Lt… | MTLSMaterialise N.V. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $10.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.4% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
MTLS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NNDM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallMaterialise N.V. (MTLS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
NNDM vs MTLS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NNDM or MTLS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nano Dimension Ltd.
(NNDM) is the stronger pick with 77. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 6% for Materialise N. V. (MTLS). Materialise N. V. (MTLS) offers the better valuation at 35. 6x trailing P/E (29. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Materialise N. V. (MTLS) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NNDM or MTLS?
On forward P/E, Materialise N.
V. is actually cheaper at 29. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NNDM or MTLS?
Over the past 5 years, Nano Dimension Ltd.
(NNDM) delivered a total return of -72. 3%, compared to -79. 7% for Materialise N. V. (MTLS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTLS returned -19. 3% versus NNDM's -97. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NNDM or MTLS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Materialise N.
V. (MTLS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 29β versus Nano Dimension Ltd. 's 1. 74β — meaning NNDM is approximately 34% more volatile than MTLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 26% for Materialise N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NNDM or MTLS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nano Dimension Ltd.
(NNDM) is pulling ahead at 77. 3% versus -3. 6% for Materialise N. V. (MTLS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Materialise N. V. grew EPS -43. 5% year-over-year, compared to -211. 4% for Nano Dimension Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NNDM leads at 32. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NNDM or MTLS?
Materialise N.
V. (MTLS) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 9% net margin versus -98. 0% for Nano Dimension Ltd. — meaning it keeps 2. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MTLS leads at 1. 9% versus -89. 7% for NNDM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MTLS leads at 57. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NNDM or MTLS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Materialise N.
V. (MTLS) trades at 29. 9x forward P/E versus 185. 0x for Nano Dimension Ltd. — 155. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — NNDM or MTLS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is NNDM or MTLS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Materialise N.
V. (MTLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 29)). Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) carries a higher beta of 1. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTLS: -19. 3%, NNDM: -97. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NNDM and MTLS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NNDM is a small-cap high-growth stock; MTLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(NNDM: 106.4% · MTLS: 5.8%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.