NNDM vs XMTR vs SSYS vs MTLS vs AMAT

For growth investors, Nano Dimension Ltd.

(NNDM) is the stronger pick with 77. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 7% for Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS). Materialise N. V. (MTLS) offers the better valuation at 35. 6x trailing P/E (29. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Xometry, Inc. (XMTR) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Materialise N.

V. (MTLS) is the cheapest at 35. 6x versus Applied Materials, Inc. at 47. 4x. On forward P/E, Materialise N. V. is actually cheaper at 29. 9x.

Over the past 5 years, Applied Materials, Inc.

(AMAT) delivered a total return of +213. 8%, compared to -79. 7% for Materialise N. V. (MTLS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMAT returned +20. 1% versus NNDM's -97. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Materialise N.

V. (MTLS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 29β versus Applied Materials, Inc. 's 2. 14β — meaning AMAT is approximately 65% more volatile than MTLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 126% for Xometry, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nano Dimension Ltd.

(NNDM) is pulling ahead at 77. 3% versus -3. 7% for Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stratasys Ltd. grew EPS 24. 7% year-over-year, compared to -211. 4% for Nano Dimension Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NNDM leads at 32. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Applied Materials, Inc.

(AMAT) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 7% net margin versus -98. 0% for Nano Dimension Ltd. — meaning it keeps 24. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMAT leads at 29. 2% versus -89. 7% for NNDM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MTLS leads at 57. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Materialise N.

V. (MTLS) trades at 29. 9x forward P/E versus 185. 0x for Nano Dimension Ltd. — 155. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MTLS: 83. 8% to $10. 00.

In this comparison, AMAT (0.

4% yield) pays a dividend. NNDM, XMTR, SSYS, MTLS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Materialise N.

V. (MTLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 29)). Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) carries a higher beta of 2. 14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTLS: -19. 3%, AMAT: +20. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (NNDM (Technology) and XMTR (Industrials) and SSYS (Technology) and MTLS (Technology) and AMAT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: NNDM is a small-cap high-growth stock; XMTR is a small-cap high-growth stock; SSYS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MTLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMAT is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.