Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NNNN vs CLOV vs ACHC vs QDEL vs CHEK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NNNN
Anbio Biotechnology Class A Ordinary Shares

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • DE
Market Cap$1.13B
5Y Perf.+286.2%
CLOV
Clover Health Investments, Corp.

Medical - Healthcare Plans

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.62B
5Y Perf.-21.4%
ACHC
Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc.

Medical - Care Facilities

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.32B
5Y Perf.-16.0%
QDEL
QuidelOrtho Corporation

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$737M
5Y Perf.-72.9%
CHEK
Check-Cap Ltd.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$12M
5Y Perf.+102.1%

NNNN vs CLOV vs ACHC vs QDEL vs CHEK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NNNN logoNNNN
CLOV logoCLOV
ACHC logoACHC
QDEL logoQDEL
CHEK logoCHEK
IndustryMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - Healthcare PlansMedical - Care FacilitiesMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - Diagnostics & Research
Market Cap$1.13B$1.62B$2.32B$737M$12M
Revenue (TTM)$16M$2.21B$3.37B$2.66B$0.00
Net Income (TTM)$5M$-57M$-1.11B$-1.21B$-25M
Gross Margin62.1%18.2%56.2%56.6%
Operating Margin26.5%-2.8%11.7%-37.0%
Forward P/E461.4x88.1x16.7x6.0x
Total Debt$0.00$0.00$2.65B$2.80B$136K
Cash & Equiv.$12M$78M$133M$170M

NNNN vs CLOV vs ACHC vs QDEL vs CHEKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NNNN
CLOV
ACHC
QDEL
CHEK
StockFeb 25May 26Return
Anbio Biotechnology… (NNNN)100386.2+286.2%
Clover Health Inves… (CLOV)10078.6-21.4%
Acadia Healthcare C… (ACHC)10084.0-16.0%
QuidelOrtho Corpora… (QDEL)10027.1-72.9%
Check-Cap Ltd. (CHEK)100202.1+102.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NNNN vs CLOV vs ACHC vs QDEL vs CHEK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NNNN leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. Clover Health Investments, Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. QDEL and CHEK also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
NNNN
Anbio Biotechnology Class A Ordinary Shares
The Growth Play

NNNN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 21.9%, EPS growth 366.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
  • 347.8% 10Y total return vs ACHC's -57.2%
  • Beta 0.46, current ratio 10.71x
  • Beta 0.46 vs QDEL's 2.28
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
CLOV
Clover Health Investments, Corp.
The Insurance Pick

CLOV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.

  • 40.3% revenue growth vs CHEK's -48.5%
Best for: growth
ACHC
Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc.
The Income Pick

ACHC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.82
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.82, current ratio 1.55x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
QDEL
QuidelOrtho Corporation
The Value Play

QDEL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Better valuation composite
Best for: value
CHEK
Check-Cap Ltd.
The Quality Compounder

CHEK is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.

  • 212.2% margin vs QDEL's -45.6%
Best for: quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCLOV logoCLOV40.3% revenue growth vs CHEK's -48.5%
ValueQDEL logoQDELBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsCHEK logoCHEK212.2% margin vs QDEL's -45.6%
Stability / SafetyNNNN logoNNNNBeta 0.46 vs QDEL's 2.28
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NNNN logoNNNN+289.7% vs QDEL's -70.3%
Efficiency (ROA)NNNN logoNNNN26.4% ROA vs CHEK's -66.7%, ROIC 28.3% vs -287.7%

NNNN vs CLOV vs ACHC vs QDEL vs CHEK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NNNNAnbio Biotechnology Class A Ordinary Shares

Segment breakdown not available.

CLOVClover Health Investments, Corp.
FY 2025
Insurance Segment
100.0%$50M
ACHCAcadia Healthcare Company, Inc.
FY 2025
United States Facilities
100.0%$3.3B
QDELQuidelOrtho Corporation
FY 2023
Other
100.0%$483M
CHEKCheck-Cap Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

NNNN vs CLOV vs ACHC vs QDEL vs CHEK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNNNNLAGGINGCHEK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NNNN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

ACHC and CHEK operate at a comparable scale, with $3.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. NNNN is the more profitable business, keeping 31.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to QDEL's -45.6%. On growth, CLOV holds the edge at +61.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNNNN logoNNNNAnbio Biotechnolo…CLOV logoCLOVClover Health Inv…ACHC logoACHCAcadia Healthcare…QDEL logoQDELQuidelOrtho Corpo…CHEK logoCHEKCheck-Cap Ltd.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$16M$2.2B$3.4B$2.7B$0
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$5M-$60M$588M-$649M-$26M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$5M-$57M-$1.1B-$1.2B-$25M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$3M$55M-$215M-$75M-$8,004
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+62.1%+18.2%+56.2%+56.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+26.5%-2.8%+11.7%-37.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+31.0%-2.6%-32.8%-45.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+20.0%+2.5%-6.4%-2.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-36.0%+61.0%+7.6%-10.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.7%-49.8%-6.1%-155.6%
NNNN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

QDEL leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, ACHC's 8.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NNNN's 437.3x.

MetricNNNN logoNNNNAnbio Biotechnolo…CLOV logoCLOVClover Health Inv…ACHC logoACHCAcadia Healthcare…QDEL logoQDELQuidelOrtho Corpo…CHEK logoCHEKCheck-Cap Ltd.
Market CapShares × price$1.1B$1.6B$2.3B$737M$12M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.1B$1.5B$4.8B$3.4B$12M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS461.43x-18.35x-2.07x-0.65x-0.48x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.88.14x16.75x5.96x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple437.29x8.38x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue138.56x0.84x0.70x0.27x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share63.57x5.23x1.07x0.38x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF545.16x
QDEL leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NNNN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

NNNN delivers a 29.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $-2 for CHEK. ACHC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QDEL's 1.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QDEL scores 6/9 vs CHEK's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricNNNN logoNNNNAnbio Biotechnolo…CLOV logoCLOVClover Health Inv…ACHC logoACHCAcadia Healthcare…QDEL logoQDELQuidelOrtho Corpo…CHEK logoCHEKCheck-Cap Ltd.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+29.1%-17.1%-40.9%-56.3%-2.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+26.4%-9.6%-18.6%-20.7%-66.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+28.3%-34.0%+5.9%-13.6%-2.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+12.5%-24.5%+7.5%-18.0%-2.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–952562
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.24x1.46x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$12M-$78M$2.5B$2.6B$136,000
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$12M$78M$133M$170M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$0$2.7B$2.8B$136,000
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-5.99x-5.18x-2883.22x
NNNN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NNNN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NNNN five years ago would be worth $44,783 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $727 for CHEK. Over the past 12 months, NNNN leads with a +289.7% total return vs QDEL's -70.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NNNN at 64.8% vs QDEL's -50.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNNNN logoNNNNAnbio Biotechnolo…CLOV logoCLOVClover Health Inv…ACHC logoACHCAcadia Healthcare…QDEL logoQDELQuidelOrtho Corpo…CHEK logoCHEKCheck-Cap Ltd.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-12.3%+29.5%+76.2%-62.4%+21.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+289.7%-16.8%+4.0%-70.3%+136.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+347.8%+255.9%-63.5%-87.7%+48.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+347.8%-62.2%-60.3%-90.7%-92.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+347.8%-69.4%-57.2%-34.6%-99.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+64.8%+52.7%-28.5%-50.3%+14.1%
NNNN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NNNN and ACHC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NNNN is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than QDEL's 2.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACHC currently trades 83.4% from its 52-week high vs QDEL's 27.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNNNN logoNNNNAnbio Biotechnolo…CLOV logoCLOVClover Health Inv…ACHC logoACHCAcadia Healthcare…QDEL logoQDELQuidelOrtho Corpo…CHEK logoCHEKCheck-Cap Ltd.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.46x1.26x0.82x2.28x1.11x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$55.65$3.92$30.20$38.99$3.92
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$6.34$1.58$11.43$10.22$0.59
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+46.4%+79.6%+83.4%+27.8%+53.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10044.173.842.734.558.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded34K5.7M3.1M2.2M2.5M
Evenly matched — NNNN and ACHC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

ACHC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: CLOV as "Hold", ACHC as "Buy", QDEL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 13.2% upside for QDEL (target: $12) vs 1.6% for ACHC (target: $26).

MetricNNNN logoNNNNAnbio Biotechnolo…CLOV logoCLOVClover Health Inv…ACHC logoACHCAcadia Healthcare…QDEL logoQDELQuidelOrtho Corpo…CHEK logoCHEKCheck-Cap Ltd.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$3.33$25.59$12.25
# AnalystsCovering analysts92515
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.4%+2.2%0.0%0.0%
ACHC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

NNNN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). QDEL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallAnbio Biotechnology Class A… (NNNN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NNNN vs CLOV vs ACHC vs QDEL vs CHEK: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NNNN or CLOV or ACHC or QDEL or CHEK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Clover Health Investments, Corp.

(CLOV) is the stronger pick with 40. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 9% for QuidelOrtho Corporation (QDEL). Anbio Biotechnology Class A Ordinary Shares (NNNN) offers the better valuation at 461. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. (ACHC) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NNNN or CLOV or ACHC or QDEL or CHEK?

On forward P/E, QuidelOrtho Corporation is actually cheaper at 6.

0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NNNN or CLOV or ACHC or QDEL or CHEK?

Over the past 5 years, Anbio Biotechnology Class A Ordinary Shares (NNNN) delivered a total return of +347.

8%, compared to -92. 7% for Check-Cap Ltd. (CHEK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NNNN returned +347. 8% versus CHEK's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NNNN or CLOV or ACHC or QDEL or CHEK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Anbio Biotechnology Class A Ordinary Shares (NNNN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

46β versus QuidelOrtho Corporation's 2. 28β — meaning QDEL is approximately 396% more volatile than NNNN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. (ACHC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 124% versus 146% for QuidelOrtho Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NNNN or CLOV or ACHC or QDEL or CHEK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Clover Health Investments, Corp.

(CLOV) is pulling ahead at 40. 3% versus -1. 9% for QuidelOrtho Corporation (QDEL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Anbio Biotechnology Class A Ordinary Shares grew EPS 366. 7% year-over-year, compared to -537. 4% for Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NNNN leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NNNN or CLOV or ACHC or QDEL or CHEK?

Anbio Biotechnology Class A Ordinary Shares (NNNN) is the more profitable company, earning 29.

0% net margin versus -41. 5% for QuidelOrtho Corporation — meaning it keeps 29. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NNNN leads at 24. 4% versus -33. 7% for QDEL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NNNN leads at 71. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NNNN or CLOV or ACHC or QDEL or CHEK more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, QuidelOrtho Corporation (QDEL) trades at 6.

0x forward P/E versus 88. 1x for Clover Health Investments, Corp. — 82. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for QDEL: 13. 2% to $12. 25.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NNNN or CLOV or ACHC or QDEL or CHEK?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is NNNN or CLOV or ACHC or QDEL or CHEK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Anbio Biotechnology Class A Ordinary Shares (NNNN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

46), +347. 8% 10Y return). QuidelOrtho Corporation (QDEL) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NNNN: +347. 8%, QDEL: -34. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NNNN and CLOV and ACHC and QDEL and CHEK?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: NNNN is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLOV is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACHC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; QDEL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CHEK is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

NNNN

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLOV

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 30%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACHC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 33%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

QDEL

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 33%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CHEK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform NNNN and CLOV and ACHC and QDEL and CHEK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(NNNN: -36.0% · CLOV: 61.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.