Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NNNN vs CLOV vs ACHC vs QDEL vs CHEK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Plans
Medical - Care Facilities
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
NNNN vs CLOV vs ACHC vs QDEL vs CHEK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Healthcare Plans | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $1.13B | $1.62B | $2.32B | $737M | $12M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16M | $2.21B | $3.37B | $2.66B | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $-57M | $-1.11B | $-1.21B | $-25M |
| Gross Margin | 62.1% | 18.2% | 56.2% | 56.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 26.5% | -2.8% | 11.7% | -37.0% | — |
| Forward P/E | 461.4x | 88.1x | 16.7x | 6.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $0.00 | $2.65B | $2.80B | $136K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $78M | $133M | $170M | — |
NNNN vs CLOV vs ACHC vs QDEL vs CHEK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anbio Biotechnology… (NNNN) | 100 | 386.2 | +286.2% |
| Clover Health Inves… (CLOV) | 100 | 78.6 | -21.4% |
| Acadia Healthcare C… (ACHC) | 100 | 84.0 | -16.0% |
| QuidelOrtho Corpora… (QDEL) | 100 | 27.1 | -72.9% |
| Check-Cap Ltd. (CHEK) | 100 | 202.1 | +102.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NNNN vs CLOV vs ACHC vs QDEL vs CHEK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NNNN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 21.9%, EPS growth 366.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
- 347.8% 10Y total return vs ACHC's -57.2%
- Beta 0.46, current ratio 10.71x
- Beta 0.46 vs QDEL's 2.28
CLOV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 40.3% revenue growth vs CHEK's -48.5%
ACHC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.82
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, current ratio 1.55x
QDEL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Better valuation composite
CHEK is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 212.2% margin vs QDEL's -45.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.3% revenue growth vs CHEK's -48.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 212.2% margin vs QDEL's -45.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs QDEL's 2.28 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +289.7% vs QDEL's -70.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.4% ROA vs CHEK's -66.7%, ROIC 28.3% vs -287.7% |
NNNN vs CLOV vs ACHC vs QDEL vs CHEK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NNNN vs CLOV vs ACHC vs QDEL vs CHEK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NNNN leads in 3 of 6 categories
QDEL leads 1 • ACHC leads 1 • CLOV leads 0 • CHEK leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NNNN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACHC and CHEK operate at a comparable scale, with $3.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. NNNN is the more profitable business, keeping 31.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to QDEL's -45.6%. On growth, CLOV holds the edge at +61.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16M | $2.2B | $3.4B | $2.7B | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | -$60M | $588M | -$649M | -$26M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | -$57M | -$1.1B | -$1.2B | -$25M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | $55M | -$215M | -$75M | -$8,004 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.1% | +18.2% | +56.2% | +56.6% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.5% | -2.8% | +11.7% | -37.0% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +31.0% | -2.6% | -32.8% | -45.6% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.0% | +2.5% | -6.4% | -2.8% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.0% | +61.0% | +7.6% | -10.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.7% | — | -49.8% | -6.1% | -155.6% |
Valuation Metrics
QDEL leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ACHC's 8.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NNNN's 437.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $1.6B | $2.3B | $737M | $12M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $1.5B | $4.8B | $3.4B | $12M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 461.43x | -18.35x | -2.07x | -0.65x | -0.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 88.14x | 16.75x | 5.96x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 437.29x | — | 8.38x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 138.56x | 0.84x | 0.70x | 0.27x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 63.57x | 5.23x | 1.07x | 0.38x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 545.16x | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NNNN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NNNN delivers a 29.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $-2 for CHEK. ACHC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QDEL's 1.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QDEL scores 6/9 vs CHEK's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +29.1% | -17.1% | -40.9% | -56.3% | -2.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +26.4% | -9.6% | -18.6% | -20.7% | -66.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +28.3% | -34.0% | +5.9% | -13.6% | -2.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.5% | -24.5% | +7.5% | -18.0% | -2.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 1.24x | 1.46x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$12M | -$78M | $2.5B | $2.6B | $136,000 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $78M | $133M | $170M | — |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $0 | $2.7B | $2.8B | $136,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | -5.99x | -5.18x | -2883.22x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NNNN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NNNN five years ago would be worth $44,783 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $727 for CHEK. Over the past 12 months, NNNN leads with a +289.7% total return vs QDEL's -70.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NNNN at 64.8% vs QDEL's -50.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.3% | +29.5% | +76.2% | -62.4% | +21.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +289.7% | -16.8% | +4.0% | -70.3% | +136.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +347.8% | +255.9% | -63.5% | -87.7% | +48.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +347.8% | -62.2% | -60.3% | -90.7% | -92.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +347.8% | -69.4% | -57.2% | -34.6% | -99.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +64.8% | +52.7% | -28.5% | -50.3% | +14.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NNNN and ACHC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NNNN is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than QDEL's 2.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACHC currently trades 83.4% from its 52-week high vs QDEL's 27.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.46x | 1.26x | 0.82x | 2.28x | 1.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $55.65 | $3.92 | $30.20 | $38.99 | $3.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.34 | $1.58 | $11.43 | $10.22 | $0.59 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +46.4% | +79.6% | +83.4% | +27.8% | +53.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.1 | 73.8 | 42.7 | 34.5 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 34K | 5.7M | 3.1M | 2.2M | 2.5M |
Analyst Outlook
ACHC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CLOV as "Hold", ACHC as "Buy", QDEL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 13.2% upside for QDEL (target: $12) vs 1.6% for ACHC (target: $26).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.33 | $25.59 | $12.25 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 25 | 15 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.4% | +2.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
NNNN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). QDEL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
NNNN vs CLOV vs ACHC vs QDEL vs CHEK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NNNN or CLOV or ACHC or QDEL or CHEK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Clover Health Investments, Corp.
(CLOV) is the stronger pick with 40. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 9% for QuidelOrtho Corporation (QDEL). Anbio Biotechnology Class A Ordinary Shares (NNNN) offers the better valuation at 461. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. (ACHC) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NNNN or CLOV or ACHC or QDEL or CHEK?
On forward P/E, QuidelOrtho Corporation is actually cheaper at 6.
0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NNNN or CLOV or ACHC or QDEL or CHEK?
Over the past 5 years, Anbio Biotechnology Class A Ordinary Shares (NNNN) delivered a total return of +347.
8%, compared to -92. 7% for Check-Cap Ltd. (CHEK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NNNN returned +347. 8% versus CHEK's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NNNN or CLOV or ACHC or QDEL or CHEK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Anbio Biotechnology Class A Ordinary Shares (NNNN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
46β versus QuidelOrtho Corporation's 2. 28β — meaning QDEL is approximately 396% more volatile than NNNN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. (ACHC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 124% versus 146% for QuidelOrtho Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NNNN or CLOV or ACHC or QDEL or CHEK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Clover Health Investments, Corp.
(CLOV) is pulling ahead at 40. 3% versus -1. 9% for QuidelOrtho Corporation (QDEL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Anbio Biotechnology Class A Ordinary Shares grew EPS 366. 7% year-over-year, compared to -537. 4% for Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NNNN leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NNNN or CLOV or ACHC or QDEL or CHEK?
Anbio Biotechnology Class A Ordinary Shares (NNNN) is the more profitable company, earning 29.
0% net margin versus -41. 5% for QuidelOrtho Corporation — meaning it keeps 29. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NNNN leads at 24. 4% versus -33. 7% for QDEL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NNNN leads at 71. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NNNN or CLOV or ACHC or QDEL or CHEK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, QuidelOrtho Corporation (QDEL) trades at 6.
0x forward P/E versus 88. 1x for Clover Health Investments, Corp. — 82. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for QDEL: 13. 2% to $12. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — NNNN or CLOV or ACHC or QDEL or CHEK?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is NNNN or CLOV or ACHC or QDEL or CHEK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Anbio Biotechnology Class A Ordinary Shares (NNNN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
46), +347. 8% 10Y return). QuidelOrtho Corporation (QDEL) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NNNN: +347. 8%, QDEL: -34. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NNNN and CLOV and ACHC and QDEL and CHEK?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NNNN is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLOV is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACHC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; QDEL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CHEK is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.