Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NNOX vs PRCT vs ISRG vs NVCR vs SYK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
NNOX vs PRCT vs ISRG vs NVCR vs SYK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $115M | $1.45B | $161.07B | $1.92B | $112.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12M | $322M | $10.58B | $674M | $25.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-56M | $-102M | $2.98B | $-173M | $3.25B |
| Gross Margin | -98.8% | 63.0% | 66.3% | 75.2% | 63.5% |
| Operating Margin | -469.7% | -33.9% | 30.5% | -27.2% | 22.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 43.8x | — | 19.6x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $52M | $303M | $290M | $14.86B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $39M | $287M | $3.37B | $103M | $4.01B |
NNOX vs PRCT vs ISRG vs NVCR vs SYK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nano-X Imaging Ltd. (NNOX) | 100 | 7.8 | -92.2% |
| PROCEPT BioRobotics… (PRCT) | 100 | 66.7 | -33.3% |
| Intuitive Surgical,… (ISRG) | 100 | 136.8 | +36.8% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 14.5 | -85.5% |
| Stryker Corporation (SYK) | 100 | 111.6 | +11.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NNOX vs PRCT vs ISRG vs NVCR vs SYK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, NNOX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PRCT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 1.23, current ratio 6.85x
- 37.2% revenue growth vs NVCR's 8.3%
ISRG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 20.5%, EPS growth 22.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.4%
- 5.5% 10Y total return vs SYK's 187.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.02, Low D/E 1.7%, current ratio 4.87x
- 28.2% margin vs NNOX's -452.8%
NVCR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +1.1% vs NNOX's -64.4%
SYK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 34 yrs, beta 0.55, yield 1.1%
- PEG 1.32 vs ISRG's 2.01
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.55 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.2% revenue growth vs NVCR's 8.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.2% margin vs NNOX's -452.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 34-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +1.1% vs NNOX's -64.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.8% ROA vs NNOX's -31.6%, ROIC 15.0% vs -27.9% |
NNOX vs PRCT vs ISRG vs NVCR vs SYK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NNOX vs PRCT vs ISRG vs NVCR vs SYK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ISRG leads in 3 of 6 categories
SYK leads 1 • NNOX leads 0 • PRCT leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ISRG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SYK is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.1B annually — 2041.6x NNOX's $12M. ISRG is the more profitable business, keeping 28.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NNOX's -4.5%. On growth, ISRG holds the edge at +23.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12M | $322M | $10.6B | $674M | $25.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$46M | -$102M | $3.8B | -$165M | $6.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$56M | -$102M | $3.0B | -$173M | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$47M | -$81M | $2.8B | -$48M | $4.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -98.8% | +63.0% | +66.3% | +75.2% | +63.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.7% | -33.9% | +30.5% | -27.2% | +22.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.5% | -31.8% | +28.2% | -25.7% | +12.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | -25.0% | +26.8% | -7.1% | +17.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.7% | +20.2% | +23.0% | +12.3% | +11.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.7% | -24.4% | +18.8% | -100.0% | +56.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SYK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 35.0x trailing earnings, SYK trades at a 39% valuation discount to ISRG's 57.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYK offers better value at 2.36x vs ISRG's 2.65x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $115M | $1.4B | $161.1B | $1.9B | $112.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $83M | $1.2B | $158.0B | $2.1B | $123.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.93x | -14.79x | 57.62x | -13.80x | 35.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 43.84x | — | 19.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.65x | — | 2.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 43.62x | — | 20.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 10.20x | 4.70x | 16.00x | 2.92x | 4.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.55x | 3.86x | 9.17x | 5.51x | 5.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 64.67x | — | 26.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ISRG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ISRG delivers a 16.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. ISRG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVCR's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ISRG scores 6/9 vs NNOX's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -35.5% | -27.7% | +16.9% | -50.8% | +15.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -31.6% | -20.3% | +14.8% | -16.5% | +6.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -27.9% | -55.7% | +15.0% | -16.4% | +11.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -28.4% | -22.5% | +16.5% | -28.9% | +13.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.14x | 0.02x | 0.85x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$32M | -$235M | -$3.1B | $187M | $10.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $39M | $287M | $3.4B | $103M | $4.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $52M | $303M | $290M | $14.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -379.29x | -30.92x | — | -96.80x | 6.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ISRG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ISRG five years ago would be worth $15,873 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $605 for NNOX. Over the past 12 months, NVCR leads with a +1.1% total return vs NNOX's -64.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ISRG at 14.4% vs NNOX's -52.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -37.8% | -17.3% | -19.3% | +28.3% | -15.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -64.4% | -52.1% | -15.4% | +1.1% | -22.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.2% | -7.8% | +49.6% | -75.7% | +5.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.9% | -39.3% | +58.7% | -91.3% | +21.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.1% | -39.3% | +554.2% | +30.3% | +187.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -52.4% | -2.7% | +14.4% | -37.6% | +1.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NVCR and SYK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SYK is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 83.9% from its 52-week high vs NNOX's 30.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.86x | 1.23x | 1.02x | 2.20x | 0.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.86 | $66.85 | $603.88 | $20.06 | $404.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.66 | $19.35 | $427.84 | $9.82 | $289.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +30.0% | +38.1% | +75.1% | +83.9% | +72.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.5 | 50.9 | 42.4 | 69.8 | 24.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 1.7M | 1.8M | 1.5M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NNOX as "Buy", PRCT as "Buy", ISRG as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", SYK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 922.7% upside for NNOX (target: $18) vs 37.2% for SYK (target: $404). SYK is the only dividend payer here at 1.14% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.00 | $44.50 | $622.60 | $33.50 | $403.69 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 15 | 55 | 15 | 50 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 34 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $3.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ISRG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SYK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
NNOX vs PRCT vs ISRG vs NVCR vs SYK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NNOX or PRCT or ISRG or NVCR or SYK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation (PRCT) is the stronger pick with 37.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Stryker Corporation (SYK) offers the better valuation at 35. 0x trailing P/E (19. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nano-X Imaging Ltd. (NNOX) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NNOX or PRCT or ISRG or NVCR or SYK?
On trailing P/E, Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the cheapest at 35.
0x versus Intuitive Surgical, Inc. at 57. 6x. On forward P/E, Stryker Corporation is actually cheaper at 19. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Stryker Corporation wins at 1. 32x versus Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 's 2. 01x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NNOX or PRCT or ISRG or NVCR or SYK?
Over the past 5 years, Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) delivered a total return of +58. 7%, compared to -93. 9% for Nano-X Imaging Ltd. (NNOX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ISRG returned +554. 2% versus NNOX's -96. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NNOX or PRCT or ISRG or NVCR or SYK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
55β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 303% more volatile than SYK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 85% for NovoCure Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NNOX or PRCT or ISRG or NVCR or SYK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation (PRCT) is pulling ahead at 37.
2% versus 8. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. grew EPS 22. 6% year-over-year, compared to 1. 7% for PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NNOX leads at 105. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NNOX or PRCT or ISRG or NVCR or SYK?
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 4% net margin versus -474. 3% for Nano-X Imaging Ltd. — meaning it keeps 28. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ISRG leads at 29. 3% versus -502. 9% for NNOX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVCR leads at 74. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NNOX or PRCT or ISRG or NVCR or SYK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 32x versus Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 's 2. 01x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Stryker Corporation (SYK) trades at 19. 6x forward P/E versus 43. 8x for Intuitive Surgical, Inc. — 24. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NNOX: 922. 7% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NNOX or PRCT or ISRG or NVCR or SYK?
In this comparison, SYK (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. NNOX, PRCT, ISRG, NVCR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NNOX or PRCT or ISRG or NVCR or SYK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
55), 1. 1% yield, +187. 1% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SYK: +187. 1%, NVCR: +30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NNOX and PRCT and ISRG and NVCR and SYK?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NNOX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRCT is a small-cap high-growth stock; ISRG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SYK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SYK pays a dividend while NNOX, PRCT, ISRG, NVCR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.