Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NOK vs CSCO vs HPE vs NTGR vs INTC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
Communication Equipment
Communication Equipment
Semiconductors
NOK vs CSCO vs HPE vs NTGR vs INTC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Communication Equipment | Communication Equipment | Communication Equipment | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $70.76B | $364.95B | $39.47B | $708M | $550.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $20.00B | $59.05B | $35.79B | $690M | $53.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $796M | $11.08B | $-156M | $-40M | $-3.17B |
| Gross Margin | 44.1% | 64.4% | 30.7% | 37.5% | 35.4% |
| Operating Margin | 4.1% | 23.0% | 5.8% | -4.4% | -9.4% |
| Forward P/E | 37.1x | 22.2x | 12.3x | 129.4x | 105.1x |
| Total Debt | $5.21B | $29.64B | $22.36B | $51M | $46.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5.46B | $9.47B | $5.77B | $210M | $14.27B |
NOK vs CSCO vs HPE vs NTGR vs INTC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nokia Oyj (NOK) | 100 | 313.0 | +213.0% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) | 100 | 192.7 | +92.7% |
| Hewlett Packard Ent… (HPE) | 100 | 305.9 | +205.9% |
| NETGEAR, Inc. (NTGR) | 100 | 100.6 | +0.6% |
| Intel Corporation (INTC) | 100 | 174.2 | +74.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NOK vs CSCO vs HPE vs NTGR vs INTC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NOK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CSCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 1.7%
- Beta 0.92, yield 1.7%, current ratio 1.00x
- 18.8% margin vs INTC's -5.9%
- Beta 0.92 vs INTC's 2.15
HPE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 14.1%, EPS growth -102.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.9%
- 14.1% revenue growth vs INTC's -0.5%
- Lower P/E (12.3x vs 105.1x)
- 2.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs CSCO's 1.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
NTGR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.39, Low D/E 10.2%, current ratio 2.69x
INTC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 299.2% 10Y total return vs CSCO's 301.7%
- +439.7% vs NTGR's -9.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.1% revenue growth vs INTC's -0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.3x vs 105.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.8% margin vs INTC's -5.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.92 vs INTC's 2.15 | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs CSCO's 1.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +439.7% vs NTGR's -9.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.0% ROA vs NTGR's -4.9%, ROIC 13.0% vs -8.4% |
NOK vs CSCO vs HPE vs NTGR vs INTC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NOK vs CSCO vs HPE vs NTGR vs INTC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CSCO leads in 2 of 6 categories
INTC leads 1 • NOK leads 0 • HPE leads 0 • NTGR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSCO is the larger business by revenue, generating $59.1B annually — 85.6x NTGR's $690M. CSCO is the more profitable business, keeping 18.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INTC's -5.9%. On growth, HPE holds the edge at +19.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $20.0B | $59.1B | $35.8B | $690M | $53.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.9B | $16.1B | $4.5B | -$19M | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $796M | $11.1B | -$156M | -$40M | -$3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.5B | $12.8B | $4.4B | -$11M | -$3.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.1% | +64.4% | +30.7% | +37.5% | +35.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.1% | +23.0% | +5.8% | -4.4% | -9.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | +18.8% | -0.4% | -5.8% | -5.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.3% | +21.8% | +12.2% | -1.6% | -5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.4% | +9.7% | +19.1% | -2.0% | +7.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | +29.5% | -26.2% | -123.8% | -2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — HPE and NTGR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 36.1x trailing earnings, CSCO trades at a 62% valuation discount to NOK's 95.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HPE's 12.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than INTC's 49.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $70.8B | $365.0B | $39.5B | $708M | $550.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $70.5B | $385.1B | $56.1B | $549M | $582.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 95.65x | 36.14x | -665.92x | -22.71x | -1861.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 37.08x | 22.18x | 12.33x | 129.45x | 105.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 31.54x | 26.34x | 12.80x | — | 49.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.03x | 6.44x | 1.15x | 1.02x | 10.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.75x | 7.87x | 1.59x | 1.50x | 4.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 42.79x | 27.46x | 62.95x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CSCO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CSCO delivers a 23.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-8 for NTGR. NTGR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HPE's 0.90x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CSCO scores 8/9 vs NTGR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.9% | +23.2% | -0.6% | -8.0% | -2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.2% | +9.0% | -0.2% | -4.9% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.0% | +13.0% | +3.5% | -8.4% | -0.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.8% | +13.7% | +3.4% | -6.0% | -0.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | 0.63x | 0.90x | 0.10x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$252M | $20.2B | $16.6B | -$159M | $32.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.5B | $9.5B | $5.8B | $210M | $14.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.2B | $29.6B | $22.4B | $51M | $46.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 9.64x | -11.81x | — | 3.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INTC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NOK five years ago would be worth $25,309 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,704 for NTGR. Over the past 12 months, INTC leads with a +439.7% total return vs NTGR's -9.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INTC at 53.0% vs NTGR's 23.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +90.9% | +22.3% | +23.5% | +6.5% | +178.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +147.3% | +57.5% | +82.6% | -9.7% | +439.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +210.5% | +109.3% | +120.3% | +86.5% | +258.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +153.1% | +87.2% | +95.5% | -33.0% | +95.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +141.2% | +301.7% | +269.0% | -37.7% | +299.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +45.9% | +27.9% | +30.1% | +23.1% | +53.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CSCO and HPE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CSCO is the less volatile stock with a 0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INTC's 2.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HPE currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs NTGR's 70.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.97x | 0.92x | 1.62x | 1.39x | 2.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.98 | $94.72 | $30.41 | $36.86 | $114.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.00 | $59.07 | $16.17 | $19.00 | $18.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.4% | +97.3% | +97.6% | +70.2% | +95.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 77.0 | 63.9 | 74.7 | 56.1 | 85.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 80.1M | 18.9M | 15.0M | 515K | 110.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CSCO and HPE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NOK as "Buy", CSCO as "Buy", HPE as "Hold", NTGR as "Hold", INTC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 39.0% upside for NTGR (target: $36) vs -29.6% for INTC (target: $77). For income investors, HPE offers the higher dividend yield at 2.02% vs NOK's 1.25%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.52 | $96.50 | $28.71 | $36.00 | $77.18 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 52 | 73 | 37 | 17 | 84 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +1.7% | +2.0% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 15 | 3 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.13 | $1.61 | $0.60 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +2.0% | +0.5% | +7.2% | 0.0% |
CSCO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). INTC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
NOK vs CSCO vs HPE vs NTGR vs INTC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NOK or CSCO or HPE or NTGR or INTC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (HPE) is the stronger pick with 14.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation (INTC). Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) offers the better valuation at 36. 1x trailing P/E (22. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nokia Oyj (NOK) a "Buy" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NOK or CSCO or HPE or NTGR or INTC?
On trailing P/E, Cisco Systems, Inc.
(CSCO) is the cheapest at 36. 1x versus Nokia Oyj at 95. 7x. On forward P/E, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company is actually cheaper at 12. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NOK or CSCO or HPE or NTGR or INTC?
Over the past 5 years, Nokia Oyj (NOK) delivered a total return of +153.
1%, compared to -33. 0% for NETGEAR, Inc. (NTGR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CSCO returned +301. 7% versus NTGR's -37. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NOK or CSCO or HPE or NTGR or INTC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cisco Systems, Inc.
(CSCO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 92β versus Intel Corporation's 2. 15β — meaning INTC is approximately 133% more volatile than CSCO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NETGEAR, Inc. (NTGR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 90% for Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NOK or CSCO or HPE or NTGR or INTC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (HPE) is pulling ahead at 14.
1% versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation (INTC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intel Corporation grew EPS 98. 7% year-over-year, compared to -371. 4% for NETGEAR, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HPE leads at 6. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NOK or CSCO or HPE or NTGR or INTC?
Cisco Systems, Inc.
(CSCO) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 0% net margin versus -4. 7% for NETGEAR, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CSCO leads at 20. 8% versus -5. 1% for NTGR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CSCO leads at 64. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NOK or CSCO or HPE or NTGR or INTC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (HPE) trades at 12.
3x forward P/E versus 129. 4x for NETGEAR, Inc. — 117. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NTGR: 39. 0% to $36. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NOK or CSCO or HPE or NTGR or INTC?
In this comparison, HPE (2.
0% yield), CSCO (1. 7% yield), NOK (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. NTGR, INTC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NOK or CSCO or HPE or NTGR or INTC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cisco Systems, Inc.
(CSCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92), 1. 7% yield, +301. 7% 10Y return). Intel Corporation (INTC) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CSCO: +301. 7%, INTC: +299. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NOK and CSCO and HPE and NTGR and INTC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
NOK, CSCO, HPE pay a dividend while NTGR, INTC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.