NOMD
Nomad Foods Limited
Packaged Foods
Market Cap$1.44B
5Y Perf.-52.2%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
NOMD vs WMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
WMT
Walmart Inc.
Specialty Retail
Market Cap$1.04T
5Y Perf.+214.6%
NOMD vs WMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | NOMD | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $1.44B | $1.04T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.03B | $703.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $137M | $22.91B |
| Gross Margin | 27.1% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | 10.7% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 6.9x | 44.7x |
| Total Debt | $2.29B | $67.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $325M | $10.73B |
NOMD vs WMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
NOMD
WMT
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) | 100 | 47.8 | -52.2% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 314.6 | +214.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NOMD vs WMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: NOMD leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Walmart Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
NOMD
Nomad Foods Limited
The Income Pick
NOMD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 7.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.07, Low D/E 91.8%, current ratio 1.07x
- Beta 0.07, yield 7.0%, current ratio 1.07x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
WMT
Walmart Inc.
The Growth Play
WMT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 5.0% 10Y total return vs NOMD's 41.7%
- 4.7% revenue growth vs NOMD's -2.2%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | WMT | 4.7% revenue growth vs NOMD's -2.2% |
| Value | NOMD | Lower P/E (6.9x vs 44.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | NOMD | 4.5% margin vs WMT's 3.3% |
| Stability / Safety | NOMD | Beta 0.07 vs WMT's 0.12 |
| Dividends | NOMD | 7.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | WMT | +33.0% vs NOMD's -44.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | WMT | 7.9% ROA vs NOMD's 2.2%, ROIC 14.7% vs 5.5% |
NOMD vs WMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
NOMD vs WMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLNOMDLAGGINGWMT
WMTWalmart Inc.
2leads
NOMDNomad Foods Limited
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs WMTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
NOMD4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
NOMD6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
WMT7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
WMT6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NOMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 231.8x NOMD's $3.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 4.5% (NOMD) to 3.3% (WMT). On growth, WMT holds the edge at +5.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | NOMDNomad Foods Limit… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.0B | $703.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $435M | $42.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $137M | $22.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $252M | $15.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.1% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.3% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -123.1% | +35.1% |
NOMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
NOMD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, NOMD trades at a 80% valuation discount to WMT's 47.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NOMD's 7.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WMT's 24.8x.
| Metric | NOMDNomad Foods Limit… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $1.04T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.7B | $1.09T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.49x | 47.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.87x | 44.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.34x | 24.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.40x | 1.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.52x | 10.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.86x | 24.94x |
NOMD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT delivers a 22.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $5 for NOMD. WMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NOMD's 0.92x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMT scores 6/9 vs NOMD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | NOMDNomad Foods Limit… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.3% | +22.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.2% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.5% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.2% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.92x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.0B | $56.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $325M | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.3B | $67.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.52x | 11.85x |
WMT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,531 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,992 for NOMD. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +33.0% total return vs NOMD's -44.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.5% vs NOMD's -15.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | NOMDNomad Foods Limit… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.3% | +15.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -44.8% | +33.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.3% | +160.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.1% | +185.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.7% | +505.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.8% | +37.5% |
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NOMD and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NOMD is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WMT's 0.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs NOMD's 50.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | NOMDNomad Foods Limit… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.07x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.10 | $134.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.17 | $91.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +50.4% | +96.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.3 | 58.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 17.2M |
Evenly matched — NOMD and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NOMD and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NOMD as "Buy" and WMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 33.3% upside for NOMD (target: $14) vs 5.4% for WMT (target: $137). For income investors, NOMD offers the higher dividend yield at 7.04% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | NOMDNomad Foods Limit… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.50 | $137.04 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.0% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.61 | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +16.5% | +0.8% |
Evenly matched — NOMD and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
NOMD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WMT leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallNomad Foods Limited (NOMD)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
NOMD vs WMT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NOMD or WMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD). Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (6. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NOMD or WMT?
On trailing P/E, Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) is the cheapest at 9.
5x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 6x. On forward P/E, Nomad Foods Limited is actually cheaper at 6. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NOMD or WMT?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +185. 3%, compared to -60. 1% for Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +505. 0% versus NOMD's +41. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NOMD or WMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
07β versus Walmart Inc. 's 0. 12β — meaning WMT is approximately 64% more volatile than NOMD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Walmart Inc. (WMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 92% for Nomad Foods Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NOMD or WMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus -2. 2% for Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Walmart Inc. grew EPS 13. 3% year-over-year, compared to -35. 0% for Nomad Foods Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMT leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NOMD or WMT?
Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
5% net margin versus 3. 1% for Walmart Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NOMD leads at 10. 7% versus 4. 2% for WMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NOMD leads at 27. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NOMD or WMT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) trades at 6.
9x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 37. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NOMD: 33. 3% to $13. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — NOMD or WMT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) offers the highest yield at 7. 0%, versus 0. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT).
09Is NOMD or WMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +505. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +505. 0%, NOMD: +41. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NOMD and WMT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NOMD is a small-cap deep-value stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(NOMD: -2.6% · WMT: 5.8%)Net Margin>
%
(NOMD: 4.5% · WMT: 3.3%)P/E Ratio<
x
(NOMD: 9.5x · WMT: 47.6x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.