Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NP vs HRTG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
NP vs HRTG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $2.89B | $861M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $115M | $847M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $37M | $196M |
| Gross Margin | 63.1% | 47.2% |
| Operating Margin | 62.0% | 31.7% |
| Forward P/E | 57.3x | 6.1x |
| Total Debt | $240M | $100M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $559M |
Quick Verdict: NP vs HRTG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 33.7%, EPS growth -112.7%
- 33.7% revenue growth vs HRTG's 3.7%
- 32.5% margin vs HRTG's 23.1%
HRTG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.50
- 119.4% 10Y total return vs NP's 68.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 19.8%, current ratio 152.87x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 33.7% revenue growth vs HRTG's 3.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.1x vs 57.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.5% margin vs HRTG's 23.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs NP's 0.96 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +22.9% vs HRTG's +15.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 47.2% ROA vs HRTG's 8.4%, ROIC 13.4% vs 15.4% |
NP vs HRTG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NP vs HRTG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NP leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HRTG is the larger business by revenue, generating $847M annually — 7.4x NP's $115M. NP is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HRTG's 23.1%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $115M | $847M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $74M | $281M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $37M | $196M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $52M | $177M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.1% | +47.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +62.0% | +31.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +32.5% | +23.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +44.9% | +20.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
HRTG leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, HRTG's 1.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NP's 37.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.9B | $861M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $402M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -152.35x | 4.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 57.26x | 6.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 37.31x | 1.48x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 18.09x | 1.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 60.51x | 4.94x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HRTG leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HRTG scores 7/9 vs NP's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +47.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +47.2% | +8.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.4% | +15.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.2% | +11.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $232M | -$459M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $559M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $240M | $100M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.94x | 33.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HRTG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HRTG five years ago would be worth $30,138 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,240 for NP. Over the past 12 months, NP leads with a +22.9% total return vs HRTG's +15.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HRTG at 89.9% vs NP's 7.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.6% | +2.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.9% | +15.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.9% | +585.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.4% | +201.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.9% | +119.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.1% | +89.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NP and HRTG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HRTG is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NP's 0.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NP currently trades 91.7% from its 52-week high vs HRTG's 87.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.96x | 0.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.23 | $31.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.78 | $16.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.7% | +87.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.1 | 55.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 372K | 282K |
Analyst Outlook
HRTG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NP as "Buy" and HRTG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.1% upside for HRTG (target: $39) vs -10.4% for NP (target: $27). NP is the only dividend payer here at 4.16% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.31 | $39.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.27 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% |
HRTG leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). NP leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
NP vs HRTG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NP or HRTG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc.
(NP) is the stronger pick with 33. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 7% for Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG). Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) offers the better valuation at 4. 4x trailing P/E (6. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (NP) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NP or HRTG?
On forward P/E, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 6. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NP or HRTG?
Over the past 5 years, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
(HRTG) delivered a total return of +201. 4%, compared to +32. 4% for Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (NP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HRTG returned +119. 4% versus NP's +68. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NP or HRTG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
(HRTG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. 's 0. 96β — meaning NP is approximately 94% more volatile than HRTG relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — NP or HRTG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc.
(NP) is pulling ahead at 33. 7% versus 3. 7% for Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 214. 4% year-over-year, compared to -112. 7% for Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NP or HRTG?
Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc.
(NP) is the more profitable company, earning 23. 4% net margin versus 23. 1% for Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NP leads at 50. 1% versus 30. 6% for HRTG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NP leads at 64. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NP or HRTG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
(HRTG) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 57. 3x for Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. — 51. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HRTG: 39. 1% to $39. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NP or HRTG?
In this comparison, NP (4.
2% yield) pays a dividend. HRTG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NP or HRTG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc.
(NP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 96), 4. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NP: +68. 9%, HRTG: +119. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NP and HRTG?
These companies operate in different sectors (NP (Technology) and HRTG (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NP is a small-cap high-growth stock; HRTG is a small-cap deep-value stock. NP pays a dividend while HRTG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.