Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NPK vs SEB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Conglomerates
NPK vs SEB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Conglomerates |
| Market Cap | $976M | $4.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $474M | $9.83B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $39M | $583M |
| Gross Margin | 18.0% | 5.4% |
| Operating Margin | 9.5% | 2.9% |
| Forward P/E | 29.7x | 8.8x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $1.82B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $178M |
NPK vs SEB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| National Presto Ind… (NPK) | 100 | 152.7 | +52.7% |
| Seaboard Corporation (SEB) | 100 | 154.0 | +54.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NPK vs SEB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NPK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth 29.7%, EPS growth -20.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.1%
- 106.5% 10Y total return vs SEB's 55.6%
SEB is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.32, Low D/E 34.8%, current ratio 2.40x
- Beta 0.32, yield 0.2%, current ratio 2.40x
- Lower P/E (8.8x vs 29.7x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.7% revenue growth vs SEB's 7.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.8x vs 29.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.2% margin vs SEB's 5.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs NPK's 0.92 | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield, vs SEB's 0.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.4% vs NPK's +70.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.2% ROA vs SEB's 7.2% |
NPK vs SEB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NPK vs SEB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NPK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SEB is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.8B annually — 20.7x NPK's $474M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 8.2% (NPK) to 5.9% (SEB). On growth, NPK holds the edge at +25.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $474M | $9.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $50M | $525M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $39M | $583M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$60M | -$15M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +5.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | +2.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | +5.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.6% | -0.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.7% | +3.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -34.5% | +2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SEB leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.8x trailing earnings, SEB trades at a 70% valuation discount to NPK's 29.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SEB's 11.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NPK's 24.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $976M | $4.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $973M | $6.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 29.69x | 8.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.54x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 24.18x | 10.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.94x | 0.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 722.69x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NPK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SEB delivers a 11.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $10 for NPK. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SEB scores 7/9 vs NPK's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.4% | +11.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.2% | +7.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +2.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.0% | +3.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $178M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 5.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NPK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NPK five years ago would be worth $14,659 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,235 for SEB. Over the past 12 months, SEB leads with a +80.4% total return vs NPK's +70.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NPK at 27.6% vs SEB's 6.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +29.4% | +2.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +70.4% | +80.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +107.8% | +19.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.6% | +22.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.5% | +55.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.6% | +6.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NPK and SEB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SEB is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NPK's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NPK currently trades 91.7% from its 52-week high vs SEB's 75.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.92x | 0.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $149.85 | $5989.37 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $80.70 | $2437.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.7% | +75.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.5 | 33.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 88K | 15K |
Analyst Outlook
NPK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, NPK offers the higher dividend yield at 0.73% vs SEB's 0.21%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.00 | $9.34 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% |
NPK leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SEB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
NPK vs SEB: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NPK or SEB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, National Presto Industries, Inc.
(NPK) is the stronger pick with 29. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 1% for Seaboard Corporation (SEB). Seaboard Corporation (SEB) offers the better valuation at 8. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NPK or SEB?
On trailing P/E, Seaboard Corporation (SEB) is the cheapest at 8.
8x versus National Presto Industries, Inc. at 29. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NPK or SEB?
Over the past 5 years, National Presto Industries, Inc.
(NPK) delivered a total return of +46. 6%, compared to +22. 4% for Seaboard Corporation (SEB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NPK returned +106. 5% versus SEB's +55. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NPK or SEB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Seaboard Corporation (SEB) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
32β versus National Presto Industries, Inc. 's 0. 92β — meaning NPK is approximately 187% more volatile than SEB relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — NPK or SEB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), National Presto Industries, Inc.
(NPK) is pulling ahead at 29. 7% versus 7. 1% for Seaboard Corporation (SEB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Seaboard Corporation grew EPS 469. 5% year-over-year, compared to -20. 4% for National Presto Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NPK leads at 16. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NPK or SEB?
National Presto Industries, Inc.
(NPK) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 6% net margin versus 5. 1% for Seaboard Corporation — meaning it keeps 6. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NPK leads at 8. 0% versus 2. 3% for SEB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NPK leads at 16. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — NPK or SEB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
National Presto Industries, Inc. (NPK) offers the highest yield at 0. 7%, versus 0. 2% for Seaboard Corporation (SEB).
08Is NPK or SEB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Seaboard Corporation (SEB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
32)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SEB: +55. 6%, NPK: +106. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NPK and SEB?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NPK is a small-cap high-growth stock; SEB is a small-cap deep-value stock. NPK pays a dividend while SEB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.