Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
NRIM vs HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
NRIM vs HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $558M | $949M | $7.27B | $2.81B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $243M | $336M | $3.21B | $1.39B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $65M | $68M | $550M | $243M |
| Gross Margin | 81.4% | 72.4% | 67.7% | 52.8% |
| Operating Margin | 35.5% | 23.2% | 23.4% | 22.4% |
| Forward P/E | 9.7x | 13.6x | 10.0x | 11.2x |
| Total Debt | $94M | $42M | $4.01B | $1.82B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $36M | $53M | $511M | $657M |
NRIM vs HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Northrim BanCorp, I… (NRIM) | 100 | 400.8 | +300.8% |
| Heritage Financial … (HFWA) | 100 | 139.6 | +39.6% |
| Columbia Banking Sy… (COLB) | 100 | 107.8 | +7.8% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 135.9 | +35.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NRIM vs HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NRIM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 23.8%, EPS growth 72.9%
- 355.8% 10Y total return vs HFWA's 105.8%
- PEG 0.55 vs WAFD's 3.63
- NIM 4.1% vs WAFD's 2.5%
HFWA is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 4.6%, current ratio 1.18x
- Beta 0.83, yield 3.4%, current ratio 1.18x
COLB is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends and momentum.
- 3.7% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs WAFD's 2.9%
- +43.7% vs NRIM's +18.3%
WAFD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 2.9%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs HFWA's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 0.63 vs COLB's 1.14
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs HFWA's 0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.8% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 10.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs HFWA's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs COLB's 1.14 | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs WAFD's 2.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.7% vs NRIM's +18.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs HFWA's 0.5% |
NRIM vs HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NRIM vs HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NRIM leads in 3 of 6 categories
WAFD leads 1 • HFWA leads 0 • COLB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NRIM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COLB is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 13.3x NRIM's $243M. NRIM is the more profitable business, keeping 26.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COLB's 17.1%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $243M | $336M | $3.2B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $89M | $80M | $895M | $277M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $65M | $68M | $550M | $243M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $134M | $86M | $724M | $215M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +81.4% | +72.4% | +67.7% | +52.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +35.5% | +23.2% | +23.4% | +22.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.6% | +20.1% | +17.1% | +17.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +55.2% | +25.5% | +22.5% | +15.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.8% | +85.7% | +5.9% | +46.3% |
Valuation Metrics
NRIM leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.8x trailing earnings, NRIM trades at a 38% valuation discount to HFWA's 14.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NRIM offers better value at 0.50x vs WAFD's 4.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $558M | $949M | $7.3B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $615M | $939M | $10.8B | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.78x | 14.24x | 13.28x | 13.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.73x | 13.58x | 9.99x | 11.17x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.50x | 1.63x | — | 4.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.93x | 11.79x | 12.03x | 13.26x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.30x | 2.83x | 2.26x | 1.99x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.74x | 1.04x | 1.16x | 0.96x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.17x | 11.08x | 10.30x | 13.49x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — NRIM and HFWA each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NRIM delivers a 21.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $8 for HFWA. HFWA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WAFD's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HFWA scores 9/9 vs COLB's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +21.3% | +7.5% | +8.4% | +8.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +1.0% | +0.9% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.7% | +5.2% | +5.4% | +3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.7% | +4.1% | +2.0% | +5.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.29x | 0.05x | 0.51x | 0.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $58M | -$10M | $3.5B | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $36M | $53M | $511M | $657M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $94M | $42M | $4.0B | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.01x | 0.87x | 0.82x | 0.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NRIM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NRIM five years ago would be worth $26,772 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,694 for COLB. Over the past 12 months, COLB leads with a +43.7% total return vs NRIM's +18.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NRIM at 38.7% vs WAFD's 11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.0% | +19.8% | +11.0% | +15.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.3% | +28.1% | +43.7% | +34.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +166.6% | +81.3% | +56.6% | +39.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +167.7% | +31.8% | -3.1% | +35.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +355.8% | +105.8% | +53.8% | +85.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +38.7% | +21.9% | +16.1% | +11.8% |
Risk & Volatility
WAFD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WAFD is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COLB's 1.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 97.5% from its 52-week high vs NRIM's 81.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.88x | 0.83x | 1.14x | 0.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.82 | $29.13 | $32.70 | $37.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.60 | $21.32 | $21.91 | $26.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.8% | +95.8% | +93.4% | +97.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.9 | 48.4 | 51.8 | 55.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 116K | 247K | 2.6M | 543K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NRIM and COLB and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NRIM as "Buy", HFWA as "Buy", COLB as "Buy", WAFD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 12.2% upside for HFWA (target: $31) vs -4.1% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, COLB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.70% vs NRIM's 2.56%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $31.33 | $32.90 | $35.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 14 | 19 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +3.4% | +3.7% | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 16 | 5 | 5 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.65 | $0.95 | $1.13 | $1.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% | +1.5% | +3.6% |
NRIM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WAFD leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
NRIM vs HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NRIM or HFWA or COLB or WAFD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Northrim BanCorp, Inc.
(NRIM) is the stronger pick with 23. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). Northrim BanCorp, Inc. (NRIM) offers the better valuation at 8. 8x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Northrim BanCorp, Inc. (NRIM) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NRIM or HFWA or COLB or WAFD?
On trailing P/E, Northrim BanCorp, Inc.
(NRIM) is the cheapest at 8. 8x versus Heritage Financial Corporation at 14. 2x. On forward P/E, Northrim BanCorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Northrim BanCorp, Inc. wins at 0. 55x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 63x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NRIM or HFWA or COLB or WAFD?
Over the past 5 years, Northrim BanCorp, Inc.
(NRIM) delivered a total return of +167. 7%, compared to -3. 1% for Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NRIM returned +355. 8% versus COLB's +53. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NRIM or HFWA or COLB or WAFD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus Columbia Banking System, Inc. 's 1. 14β — meaning COLB is approximately 80% more volatile than WAFD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 60% for WaFd, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NRIM or HFWA or COLB or WAFD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northrim BanCorp, Inc.
(NRIM) is pulling ahead at 23. 8% versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Northrim BanCorp, Inc. grew EPS 72. 9% year-over-year, compared to -9. 8% for Columbia Banking System, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NRIM or HFWA or COLB or WAFD?
Northrim BanCorp, Inc.
(NRIM) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 6% net margin versus 16. 0% for WaFd, Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NRIM leads at 35. 5% versus 20. 5% for WAFD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NRIM leads at 81. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NRIM or HFWA or COLB or WAFD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Northrim BanCorp, Inc. (NRIM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 55x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 63x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Northrim BanCorp, Inc. (NRIM) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 13. 6x for Heritage Financial Corporation — 3. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HFWA: 12. 2% to $31. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — NRIM or HFWA or COLB or WAFD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) offers the highest yield at 3. 7%, versus 2. 6% for Northrim BanCorp, Inc. (NRIM).
09Is NRIM or HFWA or COLB or WAFD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), 2. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WAFD: +85. 9%, COLB: +53. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NRIM and HFWA and COLB and WAFD?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NRIM is a small-cap high-growth stock; HFWA is a small-cap deep-value stock; COLB is a small-cap deep-value stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.