Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
NRIM vs HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
NRIM vs HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $558M | $949M | $7.27B | $2.81B | $908.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $243M | $336M | $3.21B | $1.39B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $65M | $68M | $550M | $243M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 81.4% | 72.4% | 67.7% | 52.8% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 35.5% | 23.2% | 23.4% | 22.4% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 9.7x | 13.6x | 10.0x | 11.2x | 14.6x |
| Total Debt | $94M | $42M | $4.01B | $1.82B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $36M | $53M | $511M | $657M | $343.34B |
NRIM vs HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Northrim BanCorp, I… (NRIM) | 100 | 400.8 | +300.8% |
| Heritage Financial … (HFWA) | 100 | 139.6 | +39.6% |
| Columbia Banking Sy… (COLB) | 100 | 107.8 | +7.8% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 135.9 | +35.9% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 345.8 | +245.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NRIM vs HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NRIM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 23.8%, EPS growth 72.9%
- PEG 0.55 vs WAFD's 3.63
- NIM 4.1% vs JPM's 2.2%
- 23.8% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6%
HFWA is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 4.6%, current ratio 1.18x
- Beta 0.83, yield 3.4%, current ratio 1.18x
COLB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends and momentum.
- 3.7% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs WAFD's 2.9%
- +43.7% vs NRIM's +18.3%
WAFD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 2.9%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs HFWA's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 0.63 vs COLB's 1.14
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs HFWA's 0.5%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 481.2% 10Y total return vs NRIM's 355.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.8% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 14.6x), PEG 0.55 vs 0.83 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs HFWA's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs COLB's 1.14 | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs WAFD's 2.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.7% vs NRIM's +18.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs HFWA's 0.5% |
NRIM vs HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NRIM vs HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NRIM leads in 3 of 6 categories
WAFD leads 1 • HFWA leads 0 • COLB leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NRIM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 1155.9x NRIM's $243M. NRIM is the more profitable business, keeping 26.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COLB's 17.1%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $243M | $336M | $3.2B | $1.4B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $89M | $80M | $895M | $277M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $65M | $68M | $550M | $243M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $134M | $86M | $724M | $215M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +81.4% | +72.4% | +67.7% | +52.8% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +35.5% | +23.2% | +23.4% | +22.4% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.6% | +20.1% | +17.1% | +17.5% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +55.2% | +25.5% | +22.5% | +15.5% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.8% | +85.7% | +5.9% | +46.3% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NRIM leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.8x trailing earnings, NRIM trades at a 46% valuation discount to JPM's 16.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NRIM offers better value at 0.50x vs WAFD's 4.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $558M | $949M | $7.3B | $2.8B | $908.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $615M | $939M | $10.8B | $4.0B | $1.51T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.78x | 14.24x | 13.28x | 13.87x | 16.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.73x | 13.58x | 9.99x | 11.17x | 14.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.50x | 1.63x | — | 4.51x | 0.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.93x | 11.79x | 12.03x | 13.26x | 18.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.30x | 2.83x | 2.26x | 1.99x | 3.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.74x | 1.04x | 1.16x | 0.96x | 2.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.17x | 11.08x | 10.30x | 13.49x | 9.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — NRIM and HFWA each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NRIM delivers a 21.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $8 for HFWA. HFWA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HFWA scores 9/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +21.3% | +7.5% | +8.4% | +8.0% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +1.0% | +0.9% | +0.9% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.7% | +5.2% | +5.4% | +3.9% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.7% | +4.1% | +2.0% | +5.7% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.29x | 0.05x | 0.51x | 0.60x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $58M | -$10M | $3.5B | $1.2B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $36M | $53M | $511M | $657M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $94M | $42M | $4.0B | $1.8B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.01x | 0.87x | 0.82x | 0.48x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NRIM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NRIM five years ago would be worth $26,772 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,694 for COLB. Over the past 12 months, COLB leads with a +43.7% total return vs NRIM's +18.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NRIM at 38.7% vs WAFD's 11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.0% | +19.8% | +11.0% | +15.2% | +0.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.3% | +28.1% | +43.7% | +34.5% | +20.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +166.6% | +81.3% | +56.6% | +39.6% | +138.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +167.7% | +31.8% | -3.1% | +35.0% | +135.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +355.8% | +105.8% | +53.8% | +85.9% | +481.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +38.7% | +21.9% | +16.1% | +11.8% | +33.7% |
Risk & Volatility
WAFD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WAFD is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COLB's 1.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 97.5% from its 52-week high vs NRIM's 81.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.88x | 0.83x | 1.14x | 0.63x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.82 | $29.13 | $32.70 | $37.42 | $338.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.60 | $21.32 | $21.91 | $26.31 | $269.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.8% | +95.8% | +93.4% | +97.5% | +96.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.9 | 48.4 | 51.8 | 55.0 | 72.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 116K | 247K | 2.6M | 543K | 7.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NRIM and COLB and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NRIM as "Buy", HFWA as "Buy", COLB as "Buy", WAFD as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.2% upside for HFWA (target: $31) vs -4.1% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, COLB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.70% vs JPM's 1.83%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $31.33 | $32.90 | $35.00 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 14 | 19 | 11 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +3.4% | +3.7% | +2.9% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 16 | 5 | 5 | 16 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.65 | $0.95 | $1.13 | $1.05 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% | +1.5% | +3.6% | +3.8% |
NRIM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WAFD leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
NRIM vs HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NRIM or HFWA or COLB or WAFD or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Northrim BanCorp, Inc.
(NRIM) is the stronger pick with 23. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). Northrim BanCorp, Inc. (NRIM) offers the better valuation at 8. 8x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Northrim BanCorp, Inc. (NRIM) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NRIM or HFWA or COLB or WAFD or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Northrim BanCorp, Inc.
(NRIM) is the cheapest at 8. 8x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 16. 2x. On forward P/E, Northrim BanCorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Northrim BanCorp, Inc. wins at 0. 55x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 63x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NRIM or HFWA or COLB or WAFD or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, Northrim BanCorp, Inc.
(NRIM) delivered a total return of +167. 7%, compared to -3. 1% for Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus COLB's +53. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NRIM or HFWA or COLB or WAFD or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus Columbia Banking System, Inc. 's 1. 14β — meaning COLB is approximately 80% more volatile than WAFD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NRIM or HFWA or COLB or WAFD or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northrim BanCorp, Inc.
(NRIM) is pulling ahead at 23. 8% versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Northrim BanCorp, Inc. grew EPS 72. 9% year-over-year, compared to -9. 8% for Columbia Banking System, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NRIM or HFWA or COLB or WAFD or JPM?
Northrim BanCorp, Inc.
(NRIM) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 6% net margin versus 16. 0% for WaFd, Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NRIM leads at 35. 5% versus 20. 5% for WAFD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NRIM leads at 81. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NRIM or HFWA or COLB or WAFD or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Northrim BanCorp, Inc. (NRIM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 55x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 63x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Northrim BanCorp, Inc. (NRIM) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 14. 6x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 4. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HFWA: 12. 2% to $31. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — NRIM or HFWA or COLB or WAFD or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) offers the highest yield at 3. 7%, versus 1. 8% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).
09Is NRIM or HFWA or COLB or WAFD or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 1. 8% yield, +481. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +481. 2%, COLB: +53. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NRIM and HFWA and COLB and WAFD and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NRIM is a small-cap high-growth stock; HFWA is a small-cap deep-value stock; COLB is a small-cap deep-value stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.