Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
NRIM vs HFWA vs JPM vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
NRIM vs HFWA vs JPM vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $558M | $949M | $908.57B | $341.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $243M | $336M | $280.33B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $65M | $68M | $57.05B | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 81.4% | 72.4% | 60.0% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 35.5% | 23.2% | 25.9% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 9.7x | 13.6x | 14.6x | 24.3x |
| Total Debt | $94M | $42M | $942.38B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $36M | $53M | $343.34B | $10.27B |
NRIM vs HFWA vs JPM vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Northrim BanCorp, I… (NRIM) | 100 | 400.8 | +300.8% |
| Heritage Financial … (HFWA) | 100 | 139.6 | +39.6% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 345.8 | +245.8% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 177.7 | +77.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NRIM vs HFWA vs JPM vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NRIM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 23.8%, EPS growth 72.9%
- PEG 0.55 vs KO's 2.17
- NIM 4.1% vs JPM's 2.2%
- 23.8% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
HFWA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 3.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 4.6%, current ratio 1.18x
- Beta 0.83, yield 3.4%, current ratio 1.18x
- Beta 0.83 vs NRIM's 0.88, lower leverage
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 481.2% 10Y total return vs NRIM's 355.8%
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- 27.8% margin vs HFWA's 20.1%
- 13.1% ROA vs HFWA's 1.0%, ROIC 15.8% vs 5.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.8% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 24.3x), PEG 0.55 vs 2.17 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs HFWA's 20.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs NRIM's 0.88, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.4% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.1% vs KO's +17.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs HFWA's 1.0%, ROIC 15.8% vs 5.2% |
NRIM vs HFWA vs JPM vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NRIM vs HFWA vs JPM vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NRIM leads in 3 of 6 categories
HFWA leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • KO leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NRIM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 1155.9x NRIM's $243M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HFWA's 20.1%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $243M | $336M | $280.3B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $89M | $80M | $81.4B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $65M | $68M | $57.0B | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $134M | $86M | $100.9B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +81.4% | +72.4% | +60.0% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +35.5% | +23.2% | +25.9% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.6% | +20.1% | +20.4% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +55.2% | +25.5% | +36.0% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.8% | +85.7% | +16.0% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
NRIM leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.8x trailing earnings, NRIM trades at a 66% valuation discount to KO's 26.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NRIM offers better value at 0.50x vs KO's 2.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $558M | $949M | $908.6B | $341.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $615M | $939M | $1.51T | $376.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.78x | 14.24x | 16.22x | 26.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.73x | 13.58x | 14.60x | 24.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.50x | 1.63x | 0.92x | 2.34x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.93x | 11.79x | 18.52x | 25.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.30x | 2.83x | 3.25x | 7.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.74x | 1.04x | 2.51x | 9.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.17x | 11.08x | 9.01x | 64.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — HFWA and KO each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $8 for HFWA. HFWA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HFWA scores 9/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +21.3% | +7.5% | +15.9% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +1.0% | +1.3% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.7% | +5.2% | +4.5% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.7% | +4.1% | +8.9% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.29x | 0.05x | 2.60x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $58M | -$10M | $599.0B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $36M | $53M | $343.3B | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $94M | $42M | $942.4B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.01x | 0.87x | 0.74x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NRIM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NRIM five years ago would be worth $26,772 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,180 for HFWA. Over the past 12 months, HFWA leads with a +28.1% total return vs KO's +17.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NRIM at 38.7% vs KO's 11.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.0% | +19.8% | +0.8% | +16.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.3% | +28.1% | +20.9% | +17.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +166.6% | +81.3% | +138.8% | +39.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +167.7% | +31.8% | +135.5% | +65.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +355.8% | +105.8% | +481.2% | +115.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +38.7% | +21.9% | +33.7% | +11.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JPM and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NRIM's 0.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs NRIM's 81.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.88x | 0.83x | 0.87x | -0.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.82 | $29.13 | $338.09 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.60 | $21.32 | $269.72 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.8% | +95.8% | +96.2% | +94.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.9 | 48.4 | 72.1 | 49.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 116K | 247K | 7.4M | 13.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HFWA and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NRIM as "Buy", HFWA as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.2% upside for HFWA (target: $31) vs 4.5% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, HFWA offers the higher dividend yield at 3.40% vs JPM's 1.83%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $31.33 | $339.75 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 14 | 61 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +3.4% | +1.8% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 16 | 5 | 15 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.65 | $0.95 | $5.95 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% | +3.8% | +0.2% |
NRIM leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 3 categories are tied.
NRIM vs HFWA vs JPM vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NRIM or HFWA or JPM or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Northrim BanCorp, Inc.
(NRIM) is the stronger pick with 23. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Northrim BanCorp, Inc. (NRIM) offers the better valuation at 8. 8x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Northrim BanCorp, Inc. (NRIM) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NRIM or HFWA or JPM or KO?
On trailing P/E, Northrim BanCorp, Inc.
(NRIM) is the cheapest at 8. 8x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 26. 1x. On forward P/E, Northrim BanCorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Northrim BanCorp, Inc. wins at 0. 55x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NRIM or HFWA or JPM or KO?
Over the past 5 years, Northrim BanCorp, Inc.
(NRIM) delivered a total return of +167. 7%, compared to +31. 8% for Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus HFWA's +105. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NRIM or HFWA or JPM or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
23β versus Northrim BanCorp, Inc. 's 0. 88β — meaning NRIM is approximately -477% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NRIM or HFWA or JPM or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northrim BanCorp, Inc.
(NRIM) is pulling ahead at 23. 8% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Northrim BanCorp, Inc. grew EPS 72. 9% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NRIM or HFWA or JPM or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 20. 1% for Heritage Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NRIM leads at 35. 5% versus 23. 2% for HFWA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NRIM leads at 81. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NRIM or HFWA or JPM or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Northrim BanCorp, Inc. (NRIM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 55x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Northrim BanCorp, Inc. (NRIM) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 14. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HFWA: 12. 2% to $31. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — NRIM or HFWA or JPM or KO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) offers the highest yield at 3. 4%, versus 1. 8% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).
09Is NRIM or HFWA or JPM or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
23), 2. 6% yield, +115. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 0%, HFWA: +105. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NRIM and HFWA and JPM and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (NRIM (Financial Services) and HFWA (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NRIM is a small-cap high-growth stock; HFWA is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.