Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NRUC vs ED vs AEE vs WEC vs EVRG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Electric
Regulated Electric
Regulated Electric
Regulated Electric
NRUC vs ED vs AEE vs WEC vs EVRG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric |
| Market Cap | — | $39.20B | $30.09B | $36.74B | $19.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $23M | $17.21B | $8.88B | $10.08B | $5.99B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $212M | $2.15B | $1.52B | $1.64B | $882M |
| Gross Margin | — | 67.5% | 51.7% | 55.7% | 41.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 17.3% | 24.0% | 24.0% | 25.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 17.4x | 20.3x | 20.2x | 19.5x |
| Total Debt | $32.26B | $28.75B | $19.83B | $22.31B | $15.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $135M | $1.63B | $13M | $28M | $25M |
NRUC vs ED vs AEE vs WEC vs EVRG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| National Rural Util… (NRUC) | 100 | 89.9 | -10.1% |
| Consolidated Edison… (ED) | 100 | 141.7 | +41.7% |
| Ameren Corporation (AEE) | 100 | 145.5 | +45.5% |
| WEC Energy Group, I… (WEC) | 100 | 122.9 | +22.9% |
| Evergy, Inc. (EVRG) | 100 | 134.1 | +34.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NRUC vs ED vs AEE vs WEC vs EVRG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NRUC is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 6.0% margin vs ED's 12.5%
ED has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.52 vs WEC's 4.06
- Lower P/E (17.4x vs 19.5x), PEG 1.52 vs 3.19
- 4.0% ROA vs NRUC's 0.6%
AEE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.4%, EPS growth 21.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.4%
- 170.4% 10Y total return vs EVRG's 100.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05, current ratio 0.66x
- 15.4% revenue growth vs NRUC's -96.6%
Among these 5 stocks, WEC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
EVRG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 3.2%
- Beta 0.06, yield 3.2%, current ratio 0.49x
- 3.2% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs WEC's 3.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +22.7% vs ED's -1.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.4% revenue growth vs NRUC's -96.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.4x vs 19.5x), PEG 1.52 vs 3.19 | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.0% margin vs ED's 12.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs NRUC's 0.73, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs WEC's 3.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +22.7% vs ED's -1.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.0% ROA vs NRUC's 0.6% |
NRUC vs ED vs AEE vs WEC vs EVRG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NRUC vs ED vs AEE vs WEC vs EVRG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ED leads in 2 of 6 categories
NRUC leads 1 • EVRG leads 1 • AEE leads 0 • WEC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NRUC leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ED is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.2B annually — 735.1x NRUC's $23M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.0% (NRUC) to 12.5% (ED). On growth, WEC holds the edge at +9.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $23M | $17.2B | $8.9B | $10.1B | $6.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$84M | $5.3B | $3.7B | $3.9B | $2.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $212M | $2.2B | $1.5B | $1.6B | $882M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $299M | $4.0B | -$1.3B | -$1.1B | -$1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +67.5% | +51.7% | +55.7% | +41.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +17.3% | +24.0% | +24.0% | +25.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +12.5% | +17.2% | +16.2% | +14.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.9% | +23.2% | -14.7% | -11.0% | -18.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +6.2% | +3.8% | +9.0% | +5.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +12.9% | +19.6% | +7.9% | +18.5% |
Valuation Metrics
ED leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.9x trailing earnings, ED trades at a 19% valuation discount to WEC's 23.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ED offers better value at 1.65x vs WEC's 4.70x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | — | $39.2B | $30.1B | $36.7B | $19.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | — | $66.3B | $49.9B | $59.0B | $34.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 18.86x | 20.33x | 23.35x | 22.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.44x | 20.25x | 20.15x | 19.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.65x | 2.30x | 4.70x | 3.70x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.63x | 13.51x | 15.32x | 12.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.32x | 3.42x | 3.75x | 3.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.58x | 2.19x | 2.63x | 1.88x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 1088.79x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ED leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WEC delivers a 11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $7 for NRUC. ED carries lower financial leverage with a 1.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NRUC's 10.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ED scores 6/9 vs EVRG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.0% | +9.0% | +11.6% | +11.6% | +8.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +4.0% | +3.2% | +3.3% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +4.4% | +4.7% | +5.1% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +4.4% | +4.7% | +5.4% | +4.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 10.39x | 1.19x | 1.47x | 1.59x | 1.50x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $32.1B | $27.1B | $19.8B | $22.3B | $15.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $135M | $1.6B | $13M | $28M | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $32.3B | $28.8B | $19.8B | $22.3B | $15.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 3.11x | 2.61x | 2.87x | 2.46x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EVRG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ED five years ago would be worth $15,716 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,389 for NRUC. Over the past 12 months, EVRG leads with a +22.7% total return vs ED's -1.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EVRG at 13.4% vs NRUC's 4.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.9% | +7.3% | +8.6% | +6.8% | +14.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.3% | -1.1% | +12.2% | +6.2% | +22.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.4% | +17.6% | +31.2% | +29.4% | +46.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.9% | +57.2% | +43.0% | +31.8% | +49.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.8% | +84.5% | +170.4% | +133.1% | +100.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.3% | +5.6% | +9.5% | +9.0% | +13.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ED and EVRG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ED is the less volatile stock with a -0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NRUC's 0.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EVRG currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs ED's 91.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.73x | -0.41x | 0.05x | -0.03x | 0.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.75 | $116.17 | $115.58 | $119.62 | $85.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.63 | $94.96 | $93.27 | $100.61 | $63.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.2% | +91.6% | +94.1% | +94.3% | +97.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.0 | 37.6 | 43.7 | 44.5 | 45.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16K | 1.8M | 1.5M | 1.8M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WEC and EVRG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ED as "Hold", AEE as "Hold", WEC as "Hold", EVRG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 11.4% upside for AEE (target: $121) vs 2.2% for ED (target: $109). For income investors, EVRG offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs AEE's 2.59%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $108.78 | $121.11 | $122.78 | $89.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 27 | 22 | 34 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.1% | +2.6% | +3.1% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 10 | 16 | 23 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.25 | $2.82 | $3.50 | $2.62 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | — | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
ED leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). NRUC leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
NRUC vs ED vs AEE vs WEC vs EVRG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NRUC or ED or AEE or WEC or EVRG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ameren Corporation (AEE) is the stronger pick with 15.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -96. 6% for National Rural Utilities Cooper (NRUC). Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) offers the better valuation at 18. 9x trailing P/E (17. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) a "Hold" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NRUC or ED or AEE or WEC or EVRG?
On trailing P/E, Consolidated Edison, Inc.
(ED) is the cheapest at 18. 9x versus WEC Energy Group, Inc. at 23. 3x. On forward P/E, Consolidated Edison, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Consolidated Edison, Inc. wins at 1. 52x versus WEC Energy Group, Inc. 's 4. 06x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NRUC or ED or AEE or WEC or EVRG?
Over the past 5 years, Consolidated Edison, Inc.
(ED) delivered a total return of +57. 2%, compared to +13. 9% for National Rural Utilities Cooper (NRUC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEE returned +170. 4% versus NRUC's +32. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NRUC or ED or AEE or WEC or EVRG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Consolidated Edison, Inc.
(ED) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 41β versus National Rural Utilities Cooper's 0. 73β — meaning NRUC is approximately -276% more volatile than ED relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 119% versus 10% for National Rural Utilities Cooper — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NRUC or ED or AEE or WEC or EVRG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ameren Corporation (AEE) is pulling ahead at 15.
4% versus -96. 6% for National Rural Utilities Cooper (NRUC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ameren Corporation grew EPS 21. 0% year-over-year, compared to -3. 4% for Evergy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AEE leads at 3. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NRUC or ED or AEE or WEC or EVRG?
National Rural Utilities Cooper (NRUC) is the more profitable company, earning 596.
6% net margin versus 12. 0% for Consolidated Edison, Inc. — meaning it keeps 596. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EVRG leads at 25. 2% versus 0. 0% for NRUC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ED leads at 62. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NRUC or ED or AEE or WEC or EVRG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 52x versus WEC Energy Group, Inc. 's 4. 06x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) trades at 17. 4x forward P/E versus 20. 3x for Ameren Corporation — 2. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AEE: 11. 4% to $121. 11.
08Which pays a better dividend — NRUC or ED or AEE or WEC or EVRG?
In this comparison, EVRG (3.
2% yield), WEC (3. 1% yield), ED (3. 1% yield), AEE (2. 6% yield) pay a dividend. NRUC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NRUC or ED or AEE or WEC or EVRG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Consolidated Edison, Inc.
(ED) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 41), 3. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ED: +84. 5%, NRUC: +32. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NRUC and ED and AEE and WEC and EVRG?
These companies operate in different sectors (NRUC (Financial Services) and ED (Utilities) and AEE (Utilities) and WEC (Utilities) and EVRG (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NRUC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ED is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; AEE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; WEC is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; EVRG is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. ED, AEE, WEC, EVRG pay a dividend while NRUC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.