Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NRXP vs ALTO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
NRXP vs ALTO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $84M | $430M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $242K | $918M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-38M | $13M |
| Gross Margin | 59.5% | 3.8% |
| Operating Margin | -63.0% | 0.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.4x |
| Total Debt | $631K | $98M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $26M |
NRXP vs ALTO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NRx Pharmaceuticals… (NRXP) | 100 | 2.8 | -97.2% |
| Alto Ingredients, I… (ALTO) | 100 | 680.7 | +580.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NRXP vs ALTO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NRXP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 101.1% revenue growth vs ALTO's -4.9%
ALTO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.30, yield 0.3%
- Rev growth -4.9%, EPS growth 119.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -11.8%
- 19.8% 10Y total return vs NRXP's -96.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 101.1% revenue growth vs ALTO's -4.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.5% margin vs NRXP's -157.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.30 vs NRXP's 1.91 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.6% vs NRXP's +58.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.4% ROA vs NRXP's -489.9% |
NRXP vs ALTO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NRXP vs ALTO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALTO leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALTO is the larger business by revenue, generating $918M annually — 3793.1x NRXP's $242,000. ALTO is the more profitable business, keeping 1.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NRXP's -157.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $242,000 | $918M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$31M | $33M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$38M | $13M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12M | $9M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.5% | +3.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -63.0% | +0.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -157.3% | +1.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -49.0% | +0.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -1.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -80.0% | +149.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NRXP and ALTO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $84M | $430M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $77M | $502M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.28x | 34.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.24x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 68.92x | 0.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 49.69x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — NRXP and ALTO each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +6.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.9% | +3.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +1.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +2.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.40x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | $72M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $26M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $631,000 | $98M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -24.18x | -0.93x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALTO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALTO five years ago would be worth $9,472 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $99 for NRXP. Over the past 12 months, ALTO leads with a +555.6% total return vs NRXP's +58.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALTO at 59.9% vs NRXP's -21.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.4% | +109.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +58.9% | +555.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.8% | +308.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.0% | -5.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.8% | +19.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.1% | +59.9% |
Risk & Volatility
ALTO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALTO is the less volatile stock with a 0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NRXP's 1.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALTO currently trades 92.8% from its 52-week high vs NRXP's 79.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.91x | 0.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.84 | $5.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.62 | $0.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.4% | +92.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.4 | 74.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 914K | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
ALTO is the only dividend payer here at 0.30% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ALTO leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Total Returns. 2 categories are tied.
NRXP vs ALTO: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NRXP or ALTO a better buy right now?
Alto Ingredients, Inc.
(ALTO) offers the better valuation at 34. 8x trailing P/E (15. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alto Ingredients, Inc. (ALTO) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NRXP or ALTO?
Over the past 5 years, Alto Ingredients, Inc.
(ALTO) delivered a total return of -5. 3%, compared to -99. 0% for NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NRXP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALTO returned +6. 8% versus NRXP's -96. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NRXP or ALTO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alto Ingredients, Inc.
(ALTO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 30β versus NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 1. 91β — meaning NRXP is approximately 529% more volatile than ALTO relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — NRXP or ALTO?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alto Ingredients, Inc.
grew EPS 119. 5% year-over-year, compared to 43. 9% for NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NRXP or ALTO?
Alto Ingredients, Inc.
(ALTO) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 5% net margin versus -23. 4% for NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALTO leads at 0. 8% versus -1324. 4% for NRXP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NRXP leads at 59. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — NRXP or ALTO?
In this comparison, ALTO (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. NRXP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is NRXP or ALTO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alto Ingredients, Inc.
(ALTO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 30)). NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NRXP) carries a higher beta of 1. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALTO: +6. 8%, NRXP: -96. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between NRXP and ALTO?
These companies operate in different sectors (NRXP (Healthcare) and ALTO (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.