Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NRXP vs ALTO vs AXSM vs REX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
Biotechnology
Chemicals - Specialty
NRXP vs ALTO vs AXSM vs REX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Chemicals - Specialty | Biotechnology | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $85M | $351M | $11.33B | $1.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $242K | $918M | $708M | $651M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-38M | $13M | $-188M | $50M |
| Gross Margin | 59.5% | 3.8% | 92.6% | 12.7% |
| Operating Margin | -63.0% | 0.8% | -24.8% | 8.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.4x | — | 62.8x |
| Total Debt | $631K | $98M | $241M | $21M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $26M | $323M | $196M |
NRXP vs ALTO vs AXSM vs REX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NRx Pharmaceuticals… (NRXP) | 100 | 2.8 | -97.2% |
| Alto Ingredients, I… (ALTO) | 100 | 680.7 | +580.7% |
| Axsome Therapeutics… (AXSM) | 100 | 285.9 | +185.9% |
| REX American Resour… (REX) | 100 | 498.3 | +398.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NRXP vs ALTO vs AXSM vs REX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NRXP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 101.1% revenue growth vs REX's -22.9%
ALTO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.30, yield 0.4%
- Beta 0.30, yield 0.4%, current ratio 2.64x
- Lower P/E (15.4x vs 62.8x)
- Beta 0.30 vs NRXP's 1.91
AXSM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 38.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 133.7%
- 18.9% 10Y total return vs REX's 464.7%
REX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.36, Low D/E 3.3%, current ratio 8.64x
- 7.7% margin vs NRXP's -157.3%
- 6.7% ROA vs NRXP's -489.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 101.1% revenue growth vs REX's -22.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.4x vs 62.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.7% margin vs NRXP's -157.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.30 vs NRXP's 1.91 | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +427.8% vs NRXP's +55.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.7% ROA vs NRXP's -489.9% |
NRXP vs ALTO vs AXSM vs REX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NRXP vs ALTO vs AXSM vs REX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
REX leads in 2 of 6 categories
ALTO leads 1 • NRXP leads 0 • AXSM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALTO is the larger business by revenue, generating $918M annually — 3793.1x NRXP's $242,000. REX is the more profitable business, keeping 7.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NRXP's -157.3%. On growth, AXSM holds the edge at +57.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $242,000 | $918M | $708M | $651M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$31M | $33M | -$167M | $67M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$38M | $13M | -$188M | $50M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12M | $9M | -$71M | $18M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.5% | +3.8% | +92.6% | +12.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -63.0% | +0.8% | -24.8% | +8.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -157.3% | +1.5% | -26.6% | +7.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -49.0% | +0.9% | -10.0% | +2.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -1.9% | +57.4% | +0.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -80.0% | +149.1% | -3.3% | +2.9% |
Valuation Metrics
ALTO leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 28.4x trailing earnings, ALTO trades at a 4% valuation discount to REX's 29.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ALTO's 12.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than REX's 16.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $85M | $351M | $11.3B | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $78M | $423M | $11.2B | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.28x | 28.38x | -59.81x | 29.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.39x | — | 62.81x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.55x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.84x | — | 16.60x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 69.15x | 0.38x | 17.74x | 2.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.40x | 124.01x | 2.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 40.58x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
REX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
REX delivers a 7.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-3 for AXSM. REX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AXSM's 2.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NRXP scores 5/9 vs AXSM's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +6.0% | -2.6% | +7.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.9% | +3.4% | -27.8% | +6.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +1.9% | -19.1% | +11.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +2.3% | -52.1% | +10.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.40x | 2.73x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | $72M | -$82M | -$175M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $26M | $323M | $196M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $631,000 | $98M | $241M | $21M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -24.18x | -0.93x | -34.13x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ALTO and AXSM and REX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AXSM five years ago would be worth $38,641 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $92 for NRXP. Over the past 12 months, ALTO leads with a +427.8% total return vs NRXP's +55.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors REX at 50.8% vs NRXP's -21.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.8% | +70.7% | +23.2% | +50.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +55.3% | +427.8% | +98.5% | +147.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.6% | +233.8% | +183.2% | +243.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.1% | -21.2% | +286.4% | +250.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.8% | +6.8% | +1886.5% | +464.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.0% | +49.5% | +41.5% | +50.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALTO and AXSM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALTO is the less volatile stock with a 0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NRXP's 1.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AXSM currently trades 94.2% from its 52-week high vs ALTO's 75.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.91x | 0.30x | 0.69x | 0.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.84 | $5.99 | $233.75 | $53.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.62 | $0.80 | $96.09 | $19.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.7% | +75.8% | +94.2% | +91.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.7 | 61.1 | 78.8 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 913K | 2.1M | 667K | 204K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALTO as "Buy", AXSM as "Buy", REX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 23.3% upside for REX (target: $60) vs -22.9% for ALTO (target: $4). ALTO is the only dividend payer here at 0.37% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.50 | $225.86 | $60.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 25 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.02 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.9% |
REX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ALTO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
NRXP vs ALTO vs AXSM vs REX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NRXP or ALTO or AXSM or REX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.
(AXSM) is the stronger pick with 65. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 9% for REX American Resources Corporation (REX). Alto Ingredients, Inc. (ALTO) offers the better valuation at 28. 4x trailing P/E (15. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alto Ingredients, Inc. (ALTO) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NRXP or ALTO or AXSM or REX?
On trailing P/E, Alto Ingredients, Inc.
(ALTO) is the cheapest at 28. 4x versus REX American Resources Corporation at 29. 5x. On forward P/E, Alto Ingredients, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NRXP or ALTO or AXSM or REX?
Over the past 5 years, Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.
(AXSM) delivered a total return of +286. 4%, compared to -99. 1% for NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NRXP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AXSM returned +1886% versus NRXP's -96. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NRXP or ALTO or AXSM or REX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alto Ingredients, Inc.
(ALTO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 30β versus NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 1. 91β — meaning NRXP is approximately 529% more volatile than ALTO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, REX American Resources Corporation (REX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NRXP or ALTO or AXSM or REX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.
(AXSM) is pulling ahead at 65. 5% versus -22. 9% for REX American Resources Corporation (REX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alto Ingredients, Inc. grew EPS 119. 5% year-over-year, compared to -4. 9% for REX American Resources Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AXSM leads at 133. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NRXP or ALTO or AXSM or REX?
REX American Resources Corporation (REX) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
1% net margin versus -23. 4% for NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: REX leads at 10. 0% versus -1324. 4% for NRXP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AXSM leads at 92. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NRXP or ALTO or AXSM or REX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Alto Ingredients, Inc.
(ALTO) trades at 15. 4x forward P/E versus 62. 8x for REX American Resources Corporation — 47. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for REX: 23. 3% to $60. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NRXP or ALTO or AXSM or REX?
In this comparison, ALTO (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. NRXP, AXSM, REX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NRXP or ALTO or AXSM or REX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.
(AXSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 69), +1886% 10Y return). NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NRXP) carries a higher beta of 1. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AXSM: +1886%, NRXP: -96. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NRXP and ALTO and AXSM and REX?
These companies operate in different sectors (NRXP (Healthcare) and ALTO (Basic Materials) and AXSM (Healthcare) and REX (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NRXP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALTO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AXSM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; REX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.