NSP
Insperity, Inc.
Staffing & Employment Services
Market Cap$1.25B
5Y Perf.-36.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
NSP vs TRI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corporation
Specialty Business Services
Market Cap$40.72B
5Y Perf.+31.5%
NSP vs TRI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | NSP | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Specialty Business Services |
| Market Cap | $1.25B | $40.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.81B | $7.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $1.53B |
| Gross Margin | 13.2% | 53.7% |
| Operating Margin | -0.1% | 28.8% |
| Forward P/E | 15.3x | 21.2x |
| Total Debt | $435M | $2.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $642M | $511M |
NSP vs TRI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
NSP
TRI
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Insperity, Inc. (NSP) | 100 | 63.1 | -36.9% |
| Thomson Reuters Cor… (TRI) | 100 | 131.5 | +31.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NSP vs TRI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TRI leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Insperity, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
NSP
Insperity, Inc.
The Defensive Pick
NSP is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.06, yield 7.2%, current ratio 1.06x
- Lower P/E (15.3x vs 21.2x)
- 7.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs TRI's 2.5%
Best for: defensive
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corporation
The Income Pick
TRI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 2.5%
- Rev growth 4.8%, EPS growth -30.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.7%
- 155.3% 10Y total return vs NSP's 59.4%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TRI | 4.8% revenue growth vs NSP's 3.5% |
| Value | NSP | Lower P/E (15.3x vs 21.2x) |
| Quality / Margins | TRI | 19.9% margin vs NSP's -0.1% |
| Stability / Safety | TRI | Beta 0.38 vs NSP's 1.06, lower leverage |
| Dividends | NSP | 7.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs TRI's 2.5% |
| Momentum (1Y) | NSP | -46.2% vs TRI's -50.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TRI | 8.5% ROA vs NSP's -0.3% |
NSP vs TRI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
NSP vs TRI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTRILAGGINGNSP
NSPInsperity, Inc.
1leads
TRIThomson Reuters Corpo…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs NSPMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
TRI6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
NSP3/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
TRI6/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TRI4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRI and NSP operate at a comparable scale, with $7.7B and $6.8B in trailing revenue. TRI is the more profitable business, keeping 19.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NSP's -0.1%. On growth, TRI holds the edge at +8.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | NSPInsperity, Inc. | TRIThomson Reuters C… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.8B | $7.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $35M | $3.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $1.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$309M | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +53.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.1% | +28.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.1% | +19.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.5% | +22.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.4% | +8.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.0% | +7.6% |
TRI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
NSP leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, TRI's 14.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NSP's 29.7x.
| Metric | NSPInsperity, Inc. | TRIThomson Reuters C… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $40.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $42.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -181.61x | 27.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.27x | 21.21x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.66x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.74x | 14.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.18x | 5.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 27.00x | 3.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 19.84x |
NSP leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRI leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRI delivers a 12.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-8 for NSP. TRI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NSP's 9.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRI scores 6/9 vs NSP's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | NSPInsperity, Inc. | TRIThomson Reuters C… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.7% | +12.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.3% | +8.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +11.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.6% | +13.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 9.46x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$207M | $1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $642M | $511M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $435M | $2.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.29x | 18.32x |
TRI leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRI five years ago would be worth $10,573 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,138 for NSP. Over the past 12 months, NSP leads with a -46.2% total return vs TRI's -50.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRI at -6.5% vs NSP's -29.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | NSPInsperity, Inc. | TRIThomson Reuters C… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.8% | -26.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -46.2% | -50.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.6% | -18.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.6% | +5.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.4% | +155.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -29.9% | -6.5% |
TRI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NSP and TRI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TRI is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NSP's 1.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NSP currently trades 45.3% from its 52-week high vs TRI's 42.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | NSPInsperity, Inc. | TRIThomson Reuters C… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.06x | 0.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $72.23 | $221.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.57 | $79.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.3% | +42.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.6 | 48.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 972K | 2.3M |
Evenly matched — NSP and TRI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NSP and TRI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NSP as "Hold" and TRI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.5% upside for TRI (target: $147) vs 48.7% for NSP (target: $49). For income investors, NSP offers the higher dividend yield at 7.25% vs TRI's 2.51%.
| Metric | NSPInsperity, Inc. | TRIThomson Reuters C… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $48.60 | $147.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.2% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.37 | $2.34 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | +2.5% |
Evenly matched — NSP and TRI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
TRI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NSP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallThomson Reuters Corporation (TRI)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
NSP vs TRI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NSP or TRI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) is the stronger pick with 4.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 5% for Insperity, Inc. (NSP). Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) offers the better valuation at 27. 5x trailing P/E (21. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NSP or TRI?
On forward P/E, Insperity, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 15. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NSP or TRI?
Over the past 5 years, Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) delivered a total return of +5.
7%, compared to -48. 6% for Insperity, Inc. (NSP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRI returned +155. 3% versus NSP's +59. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NSP or TRI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
38β versus Insperity, Inc. 's 1. 06β — meaning NSP is approximately 180% more volatile than TRI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 9% for Insperity, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NSP or TRI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) is pulling ahead at 4.
8% versus 3. 5% for Insperity, Inc. (NSP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Thomson Reuters Corporation grew EPS -30. 5% year-over-year, compared to -107. 5% for Insperity, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TRI leads at 4. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NSP or TRI?
Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
1% net margin versus -0. 1% for Insperity, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRI leads at 26. 3% versus -0. 1% for NSP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRI leads at 36. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NSP or TRI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Insperity, Inc.
(NSP) trades at 15. 3x forward P/E versus 21. 2x for Thomson Reuters Corporation — 5. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRI: 57. 5% to $147. 10.
08Which pays a better dividend — NSP or TRI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Insperity, Inc. (NSP) offers the highest yield at 7. 2%, versus 2. 5% for Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI).
09Is NSP or TRI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
38), 2. 5% yield, +155. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRI: +155. 3%, NSP: +59. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NSP and TRI?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NSP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TRI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(NSP: 3.4% · TRI: 8.3%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.