Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NSYS vs MEI vs PLXS vs VICR vs SMTC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Semiconductors
NSYS vs MEI vs PLXS vs VICR vs SMTC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $35M | $328M | $6.98B | $11.79B | $11.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $117M | $978M | $4.31B | $453M | $1.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $-64M | $188M | $119M | $29M |
| Gross Margin | 13.5% | 15.3% | 10.1% | 57.3% | 52.0% |
| Operating Margin | -1.0% | -2.6% | 5.2% | 18.1% | 12.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 32.6x | 92.5x | 71.9x |
| Total Debt | $18M | $343M | $175M | $13M | $552M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $916K | $104M | $307M | $403M | $152M |
NSYS vs MEI vs PLXS vs VICR vs SMTC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nortech Systems Inc… (NSYS) | 100 | 382.7 | +282.7% |
| Methode Electronics… (MEI) | 100 | 30.7 | -69.3% |
| Plexus Corp. (PLXS) | 100 | 415.1 | +315.1% |
| Vicor Corporation (VICR) | 100 | 420.6 | +320.6% |
| Semtech Corporation (SMTC) | 100 | 229.1 | +129.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NSYS vs MEI vs PLXS vs VICR vs SMTC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NSYS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.50
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 53.0%, current ratio 2.58x
- Beta 0.50, current ratio 2.58x
- Beta 0.50 vs VICR's 2.79
MEI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 6.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
PLXS is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (32.6x vs 71.9x)
VICR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 13.5%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.7%
- 27.0% 10Y total return vs PLXS's 5.2%
- PEG 2.07 vs PLXS's 3.34
- 13.5% revenue growth vs NSYS's -8.0%
Among these 5 stocks, SMTC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.5% revenue growth vs NSYS's -8.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (32.6x vs 71.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.2% margin vs MEI's -6.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs VICR's 2.79 | |
| Dividends | 6.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.4% vs NSYS's +29.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.6% ROA vs MEI's -5.6%, ROIC 8.9% vs -1.9% |
NSYS vs MEI vs PLXS vs VICR vs SMTC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NSYS vs MEI vs PLXS vs VICR vs SMTC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VICR leads in 3 of 6 categories
MEI leads 1 • NSYS leads 0 • PLXS leads 0 • SMTC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VICR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLXS is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 36.9x NSYS's $117M. VICR is the more profitable business, keeping 26.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MEI's -6.6%. On growth, PLXS holds the edge at +18.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $117M | $978M | $4.3B | $453M | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $166,000 | -$10M | $261M | $103M | $173M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | -$64M | $188M | $119M | $29M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $43M | $76M | $119M | $143M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.5% | +15.3% | +10.1% | +57.3% | +52.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.0% | -2.6% | +5.2% | +18.1% | +12.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | -6.6% | +4.4% | +26.2% | +2.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +4.4% | +1.8% | +26.3% | +13.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.9% | -2.6% | +18.7% | +11.5% | +12.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +81.5% | +2.4% | +29.1% | +3.4% | +67.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MEI and PLXS each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 41.6x trailing earnings, PLXS trades at a 58% valuation discount to VICR's 100.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), VICR offers better value at 2.23x vs PLXS's 4.27x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $35M | $328M | $7.0B | $11.8B | $11.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $52M | $567M | $6.9B | $11.4B | $11.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -26.64x | -5.26x | 41.65x | 100.13x | -53.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 32.57x | 92.55x | 71.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 4.27x | 2.23x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 33.70x | 16.39x | 24.46x | 197.81x | 104.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.27x | 0.31x | 1.73x | 28.91x | 12.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.02x | 0.47x | 4.95x | 16.50x | 16.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 45.36x | 98.86x | 256.13x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VICR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VICR delivers a 18.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-9 for MEI. VICR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SMTC's 1.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLXS scores 9/9 vs NSYS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.9% | -9.4% | +12.8% | +18.7% | +5.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.5% | -5.6% | +5.9% | +16.6% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.3% | -1.9% | +11.8% | +8.9% | +4.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.4% | -2.1% | +12.9% | +5.7% | +5.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | 0.50x | 0.12x | 0.02x | 1.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $17M | $240M | -$131M | -$390M | $400M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $916,000 | $104M | $307M | $403M | $152M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $18M | $343M | $175M | $13M | $552M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.23x | -0.63x | 19.62x | — | 2.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VICR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VICR five years ago would be worth $30,126 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,474 for MEI. Over the past 12 months, VICR leads with a +535.7% total return vs NSYS's +29.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SMTC at 86.4% vs MEI's -36.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +68.5% | +39.6% | +71.3% | +123.6% | +61.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.7% | +43.7% | +107.2% | +535.7% | +253.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.5% | -74.0% | +201.9% | +507.9% | +547.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.2% | -75.3% | +174.0% | +201.3% | +89.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +233.9% | -52.9% | +515.8% | +2704.1% | +460.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.9% | -36.2% | +44.5% | +82.5% | +86.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NSYS and SMTC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NSYS is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VICR's 2.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SMTC currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs NSYS's 81.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.47x | 2.09x | 1.64x | 2.87x | 2.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.39 | $10.78 | $275.83 | $293.95 | $127.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.50 | $4.88 | $115.35 | $40.27 | $33.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.4% | +85.8% | +94.5% | +88.9% | +95.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.2 | 73.9 | 74.2 | 68.2 | 69.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 20K | 494K | 344K | 864K | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
MEI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MEI as "Hold", PLXS as "Buy", VICR as "Buy", SMTC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -3.6% upside for PLXS (target: $251) vs -28.0% for SMTC (target: $87). MEI is the only dividend payer here at 6.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.50 | $251.25 | $245.00 | $87.44 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 | 18 | 7 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +6.2% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.57 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.5% | +0.9% | +0.3% | 0.0% |
VICR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MEI leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
NSYS vs MEI vs PLXS vs VICR vs SMTC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NSYS or MEI or PLXS or VICR or SMTC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the stronger pick with 13.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 0% for Nortech Systems Incorporated (NSYS). Plexus Corp. (PLXS) offers the better valuation at 41. 6x trailing P/E (32. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Plexus Corp. (PLXS) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NSYS or MEI or PLXS or VICR or SMTC?
On trailing P/E, Plexus Corp.
(PLXS) is the cheapest at 41. 6x versus Vicor Corporation at 100. 1x. On forward P/E, Plexus Corp. is actually cheaper at 32. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Vicor Corporation wins at 2. 07x versus Plexus Corp. 's 3. 34x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NSYS or MEI or PLXS or VICR or SMTC?
Over the past 5 years, Vicor Corporation (VICR) delivered a total return of +201.
3%, compared to -75. 3% for Methode Electronics, Inc. (MEI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VICR returned +26. 5% versus MEI's -51. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NSYS or MEI or PLXS or VICR or SMTC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nortech Systems Incorporated (NSYS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
47β versus Vicor Corporation's 2. 87β — meaning VICR is approximately 512% more volatile than NSYS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vicor Corporation (VICR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 102% for Semtech Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NSYS or MEI or PLXS or VICR or SMTC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Vicor Corporation (VICR) is pulling ahead at 13.
5% versus -8. 0% for Nortech Systems Incorporated (NSYS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vicor Corporation grew EPS 1764% year-over-year, compared to -119. 7% for Nortech Systems Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMTC leads at 7. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NSYS or MEI or PLXS or VICR or SMTC?
Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the more profitable company, earning 29.
1% net margin versus -17. 8% for Semtech Corporation — meaning it keeps 29. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VICR leads at 9. 0% versus -2. 3% for MEI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VICR leads at 52. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NSYS or MEI or PLXS or VICR or SMTC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 07x versus Plexus Corp. 's 3. 34x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Plexus Corp. (PLXS) trades at 32. 6x forward P/E versus 92. 5x for Vicor Corporation — 60. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLXS: -3. 6% to $251. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — NSYS or MEI or PLXS or VICR or SMTC?
In this comparison, MEI (6.
2% yield) pays a dividend. NSYS, PLXS, VICR, SMTC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NSYS or MEI or PLXS or VICR or SMTC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nortech Systems Incorporated (NSYS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
47), +242. 9% 10Y return). Vicor Corporation (VICR) carries a higher beta of 2. 87 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NSYS: +242. 9%, VICR: +26. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NSYS and MEI and PLXS and VICR and SMTC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NSYS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MEI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PLXS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VICR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SMTC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MEI pays a dividend while NSYS, PLXS, VICR, SMTC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.