Chemicals - Specialty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NTIC vs ASIX vs TROX vs HWKN vs AVNT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals
Chemicals
Chemicals - Specialty
Chemicals - Specialty
NTIC vs ASIX vs TROX vs HWKN vs AVNT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals | Chemicals | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $76M | $796M | $1.34B | $3.46B | $3.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $86M | $1.52B | $2.92B | $1.06B | $3.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-306K | $49M | $-359M | $82M | $158M |
| Gross Margin | 37.0% | 10.8% | 5.8% | 22.9% | 31.7% |
| Operating Margin | -4.3% | 4.2% | -4.8% | 11.5% | 9.3% |
| Forward P/E | 4438.9x | 15.7x | — | 42.3x | 12.0x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $381M | $3.59B | $160M | $1.92B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $20M | $211M | $5M | $511M |
NTIC vs ASIX vs TROX vs HWKN vs AVNT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Northern Technologi… (NTIC) | 100 | 107.8 | +7.8% |
| AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) | 100 | 202.8 | +102.8% |
| Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) | 100 | 126.7 | +26.7% |
| Hawkins, Inc. (HWKN) | 100 | 778.6 | +678.6% |
| Avient Corporation (AVNT) | 100 | 147.3 | +47.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NTIC vs ASIX vs TROX vs HWKN vs AVNT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NTIC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 17.1%, current ratio 1.86x
- Beta 0.38 vs TROX's 2.37, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, ASIX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TROX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 2.37, yield 3.6%, current ratio 2.46x
- 3.6% yield, vs AVNT's 2.9%
- +76.9% vs AVNT's +4.1%
HWKN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 6.0%, EPS growth 12.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.0%
- 7.7% 10Y total return vs ASIX's 60.6%
- PEG 1.70 vs ASIX's 8.38
- 6.0% revenue growth vs TROX's -5.7%
AVNT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 1.19, yield 2.9%
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.0% revenue growth vs TROX's -5.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.8% margin vs TROX's -12.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs TROX's 2.37, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, vs AVNT's 2.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +76.9% vs AVNT's +4.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.4% ROA vs TROX's -7.7%, ROIC 15.9% vs -0.3% |
NTIC vs ASIX vs TROX vs HWKN vs AVNT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NTIC vs ASIX vs TROX vs HWKN vs AVNT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HWKN leads in 3 of 6 categories
NTIC leads 0 • ASIX leads 0 • TROX leads 0 • AVNT leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HWKN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVNT is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.3B annually — 38.1x NTIC's $86M. HWKN is the more profitable business, keeping 7.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TROX's -12.3%. On growth, ASIX holds the edge at +9.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $86M | $1.5B | $2.9B | $1.1B | $3.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $143M | $166M | $172M | $445M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$305,653 | $49M | -$359M | $82M | $158M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $6M | -$139M | $88M | $205M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.0% | +10.8% | +5.8% | +22.9% | +31.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | +4.2% | -4.8% | +11.5% | +9.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.4% | +3.2% | -12.3% | +7.8% | +4.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | +0.4% | -4.8% | +8.2% | +6.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.2% | +9.4% | +3.0% | +7.9% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -47.8% | -8.8% | +7.1% | -4.2% | +3.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ASIX and TROX and AVNT each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.3x trailing earnings, ASIX trades at a 100% valuation discount to NTIC's 4438.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HWKN offers better value at 1.67x vs ASIX's 7.10x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $76M | $796M | $1.3B | $3.5B | $3.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $82M | $1.2B | $4.7B | $3.6B | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 4438.89x | 13.34x | -2.83x | 41.44x | 41.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.74x | — | 42.31x | 11.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 7.10x | — | 1.67x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.86x | 16.80x | 22.74x | 12.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.90x | 0.52x | 0.46x | 3.55x | 1.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.00x | 0.80x | 0.92x | 7.60x | 1.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 124.10x | — | 49.48x | 17.16x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HWKN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HWKN delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-30 for TROX. NTIC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TROX's 2.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ASIX scores 6/9 vs TROX's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.4% | +6.0% | -30.4% | +15.9% | +6.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.3% | +2.9% | -7.7% | +8.4% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.6% | +4.4% | -0.3% | +15.9% | +3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.7% | +5.3% | -0.4% | +19.3% | +4.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.47x | 2.48x | 0.35x | 0.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | $361M | $3.4B | $155M | $1.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $20M | $211M | $5M | $511M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $381M | $3.6B | $160M | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.11x | 7.92x | -1.16x | 10.27x | 3.61x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HWKN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HWKN five years ago would be worth $49,115 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,493 for TROX. Over the past 12 months, TROX leads with a +76.9% total return vs AVNT's +4.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HWKN at 61.2% vs ASIX's -9.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.5% | +40.3% | +98.1% | +15.1% | +16.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.9% | +8.2% | +76.9% | +40.6% | +4.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.9% | -25.6% | -23.6% | +318.9% | +2.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.7% | -15.9% | -55.1% | +391.1% | -22.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.6% | +60.6% | +116.1% | +765.9% | +27.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.1% | -9.4% | -8.6% | +61.2% | +0.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NTIC and ASIX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTIC is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TROX's 2.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ASIX currently trades 89.8% from its 52-week high vs TROX's 79.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.38x | 0.81x | 2.37x | 0.98x | 1.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.03 | $26.73 | $10.59 | $186.15 | $44.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.10 | $14.10 | $2.86 | $115.35 | $27.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.7% | +89.8% | +79.4% | +89.7% | +81.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.8 | 60.6 | 58.5 | 62.9 | 55.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 453K | 3.1M | 169K | 620K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TROX and AVNT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ASIX as "Buy", TROX as "Buy", HWKN as "Buy", AVNT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 32.6% upside for AVNT (target: $48) vs -13.8% for TROX (target: $7). For income investors, TROX offers the higher dividend yield at 3.60% vs HWKN's 0.42%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $22.00 | $7.25 | — | $48.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 | 17 | 1 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +2.6% | +3.6% | +0.4% | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.16 | $0.63 | $0.30 | $0.70 | $1.08 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% | +0.7% | +0.1% |
HWKN leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
NTIC vs ASIX vs TROX vs HWKN vs AVNT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NTIC or ASIX or TROX or HWKN or AVNT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hawkins, Inc.
(HWKN) is the stronger pick with 6. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 7% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) offers the better valuation at 13. 3x trailing P/E (15. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NTIC or ASIX or TROX or HWKN or AVNT?
On trailing P/E, AdvanSix Inc.
(ASIX) is the cheapest at 13. 3x versus Northern Technologies International Corporation at 4438. 9x. On forward P/E, Avient Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Hawkins, Inc. wins at 1. 70x versus AdvanSix Inc. 's 8. 38x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NTIC or ASIX or TROX or HWKN or AVNT?
Over the past 5 years, Hawkins, Inc.
(HWKN) delivered a total return of +391. 1%, compared to -55. 1% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HWKN returned +765. 9% versus AVNT's +27. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NTIC or ASIX or TROX or HWKN or AVNT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
38β versus Tronox Holdings plc's 2. 37β — meaning TROX is approximately 529% more volatile than NTIC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 2% for Tronox Holdings plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NTIC or ASIX or TROX or HWKN or AVNT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hawkins, Inc.
(HWKN) is pulling ahead at 6. 0% versus -5. 7% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hawkins, Inc. grew EPS 12. 3% year-over-year, compared to -890. 0% for Tronox Holdings plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, HWKN leads at 8. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NTIC or ASIX or TROX or HWKN or AVNT?
Hawkins, Inc.
(HWKN) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 7% net margin versus -16. 2% for Tronox Holdings plc — meaning it keeps 8. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HWKN leads at 12. 2% versus -7. 1% for NTIC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTIC leads at 37. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NTIC or ASIX or TROX or HWKN or AVNT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Hawkins, Inc. (HWKN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 70x versus AdvanSix Inc. 's 8. 38x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Avient Corporation (AVNT) trades at 12. 0x forward P/E versus 42. 3x for Hawkins, Inc. — 30. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVNT: 32. 6% to $48. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — NTIC or ASIX or TROX or HWKN or AVNT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 0. 4% for Hawkins, Inc. (HWKN).
09Is NTIC or ASIX or TROX or HWKN or AVNT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
38), 2. 0% yield). Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) carries a higher beta of 2. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTIC: +39. 6%, TROX: +116. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NTIC and ASIX and TROX and HWKN and AVNT?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NTIC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ASIX is a small-cap deep-value stock; TROX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HWKN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AVNT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. NTIC, ASIX, TROX, AVNT pay a dividend while HWKN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.