Chemicals - Specialty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NTIC vs KLIC vs ASIX vs IOSP vs HWKN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Chemicals
Chemicals - Specialty
Chemicals - Specialty
NTIC vs KLIC vs ASIX vs IOSP vs HWKN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Semiconductors | Chemicals | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $76M | $5.14B | $796M | $1.91B | $3.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $86M | $768M | $1.52B | $1.78B | $1.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-306K | $3M | $49M | $117M | $82M |
| Gross Margin | 37.0% | 48.0% | 10.8% | 27.7% | 22.9% |
| Operating Margin | -4.3% | 6.9% | 4.2% | 8.7% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 4438.9x | 37.4x | 15.7x | 15.5x | 42.3x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $39M | $381M | $90M | $160M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $216M | $20M | $293M | $5M |
NTIC vs KLIC vs ASIX vs IOSP vs HWKN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Northern Technologi… (NTIC) | 100 | 107.8 | +7.8% |
| Kulicke and Soffa I… (KLIC) | 100 | 439.0 | +339.0% |
| AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) | 100 | 202.8 | +102.8% |
| Innospec Inc. (IOSP) | 100 | 99.4 | -0.6% |
| Hawkins, Inc. (HWKN) | 100 | 778.6 | +678.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NTIC vs KLIC vs ASIX vs IOSP vs HWKN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NTIC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability is your priority.
- Beta 0.38 vs KLIC's 1.87
KLIC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 8.1% 10Y total return vs HWKN's 7.7%
- +220.8% vs IOSP's -14.9%
ASIX is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 2.6% yield, vs IOSP's 2.2%
IOSP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 2.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.70, Low D/E 6.7%, current ratio 2.79x
- PEG 0.48 vs ASIX's 8.38
- Beta 0.70, yield 2.2%, current ratio 2.79x
HWKN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 6.0%, EPS growth 12.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.0%
- 6.0% revenue growth vs KLIC's -7.4%
- 7.8% margin vs NTIC's -0.4%
- 8.4% ROA vs NTIC's -0.3%, ROIC 15.9% vs -5.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.0% revenue growth vs KLIC's -7.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.5x vs 42.3x), PEG 0.48 vs 1.70 | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.8% margin vs NTIC's -0.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs KLIC's 1.87 | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, vs IOSP's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +220.8% vs IOSP's -14.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.4% ROA vs NTIC's -0.3%, ROIC 15.9% vs -5.6% |
NTIC vs KLIC vs ASIX vs IOSP vs HWKN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NTIC vs KLIC vs ASIX vs IOSP vs HWKN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HWKN leads in 2 of 6 categories
ASIX leads 1 • NTIC leads 0 • KLIC leads 0 • IOSP leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HWKN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IOSP is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 20.6x NTIC's $86M. HWKN is the more profitable business, keeping 7.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTIC's -0.4%. On growth, KLIC holds the edge at +49.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $86M | $768M | $1.5B | $1.8B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $61M | $143M | $198M | $172M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$305,653 | $3M | $49M | $117M | $82M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $11M | $6M | $88M | $88M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.0% | +48.0% | +10.8% | +27.7% | +22.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | +6.9% | +4.2% | +8.7% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.4% | +0.4% | +3.2% | +6.6% | +7.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | +1.4% | +0.4% | +4.9% | +8.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.2% | +49.8% | +9.4% | -2.4% | +7.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -47.8% | +141.5% | -8.8% | +167.7% | -4.2% |
Valuation Metrics
ASIX leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.3x trailing earnings, ASIX trades at a 100% valuation discount to KLIC's 9999.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IOSP offers better value at 0.51x vs ASIX's 7.10x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $76M | $5.1B | $796M | $1.9B | $3.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $82M | $5.0B | $1.2B | $1.7B | $3.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 4438.89x | 9999.00x | 13.34x | 16.41x | 41.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 37.41x | 15.74x | 15.45x | 42.31x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 7.10x | 0.51x | 1.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 336.22x | 7.86x | 8.29x | 22.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.90x | 7.85x | 0.52x | 1.07x | 3.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.00x | 6.36x | 0.80x | 1.44x | 7.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 53.30x | 124.10x | 21.68x | 49.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HWKN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HWKN delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-0 for NTIC. KLIC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ASIX's 0.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KLIC scores 7/9 vs NTIC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.4% | +0.4% | +6.0% | +9.0% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.3% | +0.3% | +2.9% | +6.5% | +8.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.6% | -0.3% | +4.4% | +11.2% | +15.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.7% | -0.3% | +5.3% | +11.0% | +19.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.05x | 0.47x | 0.07x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | -$177M | $361M | -$203M | $155M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $216M | $20M | $293M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $39M | $381M | $90M | $160M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.11x | 4872.17x | 7.92x | — | 10.27x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — KLIC and HWKN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HWKN five years ago would be worth $49,115 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,931 for NTIC. Over the past 12 months, KLIC leads with a +220.8% total return vs IOSP's -14.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HWKN at 61.2% vs ASIX's -9.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.5% | +103.4% | +40.3% | +0.5% | +15.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.9% | +220.8% | +8.2% | -14.9% | +40.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.9% | +115.0% | -25.6% | -17.3% | +318.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.7% | +101.0% | -15.9% | -18.3% | +391.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.6% | +814.1% | +60.6% | +84.4% | +765.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.1% | +29.1% | -9.4% | -6.1% | +61.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NTIC and KLIC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTIC is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KLIC's 1.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KLIC currently trades 91.7% from its 52-week high vs NTIC's 79.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.38x | 1.87x | 0.81x | 0.70x | 0.98x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.03 | $107.01 | $26.73 | $95.55 | $186.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.10 | $29.91 | $14.10 | $65.58 | $115.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.7% | +91.7% | +89.8% | +80.2% | +89.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.8 | 77.0 | 60.6 | 59.1 | 62.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 617K | 453K | 221K | 169K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ASIX and IOSP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KLIC as "Buy", ASIX as "Buy", IOSP as "Hold", HWKN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 50.1% upside for IOSP (target: $115) vs -36.3% for KLIC (target: $63). For income investors, ASIX offers the higher dividend yield at 2.62% vs HWKN's 0.42%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $62.50 | $22.00 | $115.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | 6 | 9 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +1.0% | +2.6% | +2.2% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 | 0 | 12 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.16 | $1.02 | $0.63 | $1.70 | $0.70 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.9% | +0.2% | 0.0% | +0.7% |
HWKN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ASIX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
NTIC vs KLIC vs ASIX vs IOSP vs HWKN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NTIC or KLIC or ASIX or IOSP or HWKN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hawkins, Inc.
(HWKN) is the stronger pick with 6. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC). AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) offers the better valuation at 13. 3x trailing P/E (15. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NTIC or KLIC or ASIX or IOSP or HWKN?
On trailing P/E, AdvanSix Inc.
(ASIX) is the cheapest at 13. 3x versus Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. at 9999. 0x. On forward P/E, Innospec Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Innospec Inc. wins at 0. 48x versus AdvanSix Inc. 's 8. 38x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NTIC or KLIC or ASIX or IOSP or HWKN?
Over the past 5 years, Hawkins, Inc.
(HWKN) delivered a total return of +391. 1%, compared to -40. 7% for Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KLIC returned +814. 1% versus NTIC's +39. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NTIC or KLIC or ASIX or IOSP or HWKN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
38β versus Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. 's 1. 87β — meaning KLIC is approximately 397% more volatile than NTIC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 47% for AdvanSix Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NTIC or KLIC or ASIX or IOSP or HWKN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hawkins, Inc.
(HWKN) is pulling ahead at 6. 0% versus -7. 4% for Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Innospec Inc. grew EPS 228. 9% year-over-year, compared to -99. 7% for Northern Technologies International Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, HWKN leads at 8. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NTIC or KLIC or ASIX or IOSP or HWKN?
Hawkins, Inc.
(HWKN) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 7% net margin versus 0. 0% for Northern Technologies International Corporation — meaning it keeps 8. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HWKN leads at 12. 2% versus -7. 1% for NTIC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KLIC leads at 42. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NTIC or KLIC or ASIX or IOSP or HWKN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Innospec Inc. (IOSP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 48x versus AdvanSix Inc. 's 8. 38x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Innospec Inc. (IOSP) trades at 15. 5x forward P/E versus 42. 3x for Hawkins, Inc. — 26. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IOSP: 50. 1% to $115. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NTIC or KLIC or ASIX or IOSP or HWKN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 0. 4% for Hawkins, Inc. (HWKN).
09Is NTIC or KLIC or ASIX or IOSP or HWKN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
38), 2. 0% yield). Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC) carries a higher beta of 1. 87 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTIC: +39. 6%, KLIC: +814. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NTIC and KLIC and ASIX and IOSP and HWKN?
These companies operate in different sectors (NTIC (Basic Materials) and KLIC (Technology) and ASIX (Basic Materials) and IOSP (Basic Materials) and HWKN (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NTIC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KLIC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ASIX is a small-cap deep-value stock; IOSP is a small-cap deep-value stock; HWKN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. NTIC, KLIC, ASIX, IOSP pay a dividend while HWKN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.