NTIP vs MARA

For growth investors, Network-1 Technologies, Inc.

(NTIP) is the stronger pick with 50. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 38. 2% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Analysts rate Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Network-1 Technologies, Inc.

(NTIP) delivered a total return of -39. 3%, compared to -59. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTIP returned +1. 2% versus MARA's -51. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Network-1 Technologies, Inc.

(NTIP) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 01β versus Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 11β — meaning MARA is approximately -21663% more volatile than NTIP relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Network-1 Technologies, Inc.

(NTIP) is pulling ahead at 50. 0% versus 38. 2% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Network-1 Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 15. 4% year-over-year, compared to -314. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

(MARA) is the more profitable company, earning -144. 6% net margin versus -1613. 3% for Network-1 Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps -144. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MARA leads at -90. 6% versus -22. 0% for NTIP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTIP leads at 72. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, NTIP (6.

7% yield) pays a dividend. MARA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Network-1 Technologies, Inc.

(NTIP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 01), 6. 7% yield). Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) carries a higher beta of 3. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTIP: +1. 2%, MARA: -51. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (NTIP (Industrials) and MARA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

NTIP pays a dividend while MARA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.