Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NTLA vs RCKT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
NTLA vs RCKT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.61B | $418M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-413M | $-223M |
| Total Debt | $93M | $25M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $155M | $78M |
NTLA vs RCKT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intellia Therapeuti… (NTLA) | 100 | 79.1 | -20.9% |
| Rocket Pharmaceutic… (RCKT) | 100 | 20.5 | -79.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NTLA vs RCKT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NTLA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -100.0%, EPS growth 27.4%
- -37.3% 10Y total return vs RCKT's -90.7%
- +91.0% vs RCKT's -38.8%
RCKT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.31
- Lower volatility, beta 1.31, Low D/E 9.0%, current ratio 6.38x
- Beta 1.31, current ratio 6.38x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.5% revenue growth vs NTLA's -100.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.31 vs NTLA's 2.37, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +91.0% vs RCKT's -38.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -49.0% ROA vs RCKT's -67.5% |
NTLA vs RCKT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RCKT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTLA and RCKT operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$332M | -$232M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$413M | -$223M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$355M | -$190M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.2% | +38.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NTLA and RCKT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $418M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $365M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.64x | -1.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.24x | 1.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NTLA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NTLA delivers a -61.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-61 in annual profit, vs $-80 for RCKT. RCKT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NTLA's 0.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTLA scores 3/9 vs RCKT's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -61.5% | -80.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -49.0% | -67.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -63.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -58.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.14x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$62M | -$53M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $155M | $78M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $93M | $25M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTLA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NTLA five years ago would be worth $2,083 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $894 for RCKT. Over the past 12 months, NTLA leads with a +91.0% total return vs RCKT's -38.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTLA at -31.6% vs RCKT's -43.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +50.4% | +11.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +91.0% | -38.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.9% | -81.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.2% | -91.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.3% | -90.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -31.6% | -43.5% |
Risk & Volatility
RCKT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RCKT is the less volatile stock with a 1.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NTLA's 2.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.37x | 1.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.25 | $7.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.83 | $2.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.0% | +49.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.0 | 43.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.2M | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NTLA as "Buy" and RCKT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 50.8% upside for NTLA (target: $21) vs 29.5% for RCKT (target: $5).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.88 | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 39 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RCKT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). NTLA leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
NTLA vs RCKT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NTLA or RCKT a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.
(NTLA) a "Buy" — based on 39 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NTLA or RCKT?
Over the past 5 years, Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.
(NTLA) delivered a total return of -79. 2%, compared to -91. 1% for Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RCKT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTLA returned -37. 3% versus RCKT's -90. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NTLA or RCKT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(RCKT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 31β versus Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 37β — meaning NTLA is approximately 80% more volatile than RCKT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RCKT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 14% for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NTLA or RCKT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.
grew EPS 27. 4% year-over-year, compared to 26. 4% for Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NTLA or RCKT?
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.
(NTLA) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NTLA leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for RCKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTLA leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — NTLA or RCKT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is NTLA or RCKT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(RCKT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) carries a higher beta of 2. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RCKT: -90. 7%, NTLA: -37. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between NTLA and RCKT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.