Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NTNX vs PSTG vs NTAP vs HPE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Computer Hardware
Computer Hardware
Communication Equipment
NTNX vs PSTG vs NTAP vs HPE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Computer Hardware | Computer Hardware | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $12.43B | $21.99B | $22.37B | $39.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.69B | $3.66B | $6.71B | $35.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $267M | $188M | $1.21B | $-156M |
| Gross Margin | 87.1% | 70.4% | 70.5% | 30.7% |
| Operating Margin | 8.0% | 3.1% | 22.2% | 5.8% |
| Forward P/E | 25.1x | 29.2x | 14.2x | 12.3x |
| Total Debt | $1.48B | $216M | $3.49B | $22.36B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $770M | $855M | $2.74B | $5.77B |
NTNX vs PSTG vs NTAP vs HPE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) | 100 | 190.9 | +90.9% |
| Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG) | 100 | 335.4 | +235.4% |
| NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) | 100 | 253.7 | +153.7% |
| Hewlett Packard Ent… (HPE) | 100 | 296.1 | +196.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NTNX vs PSTG vs NTAP vs HPE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NTNX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 18.1%, EPS growth 227.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, current ratio 1.72x
- Beta 0.81, current ratio 1.72x
- 18.1% revenue growth vs NTAP's 4.9%
PSTG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 373.3% 10Y total return vs NTAP's 465.7%
NTAP is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- 18.1% margin vs HPE's -0.4%
- 12.2% ROA vs HPE's -0.2%, ROIC 54.4% vs 3.5%
HPE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.62, yield 2.0%
- Lower P/E (12.3x vs 14.2x)
- 2.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs NTAP's 1.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- +82.6% vs NTNX's -37.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.1% revenue growth vs NTAP's 4.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.3x vs 14.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.1% margin vs HPE's -0.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs PSTG's 2.32 | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs NTAP's 1.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +82.6% vs NTNX's -37.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.2% ROA vs HPE's -0.2%, ROIC 54.4% vs 3.5% |
NTNX vs PSTG vs NTAP vs HPE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NTNX vs PSTG vs NTAP vs HPE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HPE leads in 2 of 6 categories
PSTG leads 2 • NTNX leads 0 • NTAP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NTNX and PSTG and NTAP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HPE is the larger business by revenue, generating $35.8B annually — 13.3x NTNX's $2.7B. NTAP is the more profitable business, keeping 18.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HPE's -0.4%. On growth, PSTG holds the edge at +20.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.7B | $3.7B | $6.7B | $35.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $288M | $263M | $1.6B | $4.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $267M | $188M | $1.2B | -$156M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $777M | $256M | $1.3B | $4.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +87.1% | +70.4% | +70.5% | +30.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +3.1% | +22.2% | +5.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | +5.1% | +18.1% | -0.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +28.9% | +7.0% | +19.9% | +12.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.4% | +20.4% | +4.4% | +19.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +89.5% | +141.7% | +16.0% | -26.2% |
Valuation Metrics
HPE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.9x trailing earnings, NTAP trades at a 86% valuation discount to PSTG's 142.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HPE's 12.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PSTG's 81.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.4B | $22.0B | $22.4B | $39.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.1B | $21.3B | $23.1B | $56.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 70.66x | 142.49x | 19.93x | -665.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.15x | 29.20x | 14.16x | 12.33x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.99x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 53.61x | 81.28x | 14.63x | 12.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.90x | 6.00x | 3.40x | 1.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 16.03x | 22.71x | 1.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.57x | 35.71x | 16.72x | 62.95x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PSTG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NTAP delivers a 104.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $105 in annual profit, vs $-1 for HPE. PSTG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NTAP's 3.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTNX scores 6/9 vs HPE's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +13.0% | +104.7% | -0.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.2% | +4.0% | +12.2% | -0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.9% | +10.3% | +54.4% | +3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.5% | +4.5% | +22.4% | +3.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.15x | 3.36x | 0.90x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $713M | -$639M | $749M | $16.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $770M | $855M | $2.7B | $5.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $216M | $3.5B | $22.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.48x | 28.04x | 14.83x | -11.81x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PSTG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PSTG five years ago would be worth $35,967 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,488 for NTAP. Over the past 12 months, HPE leads with a +82.6% total return vs NTNX's -37.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PSTG at 43.3% vs NTAP's 23.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.2% | -3.0% | +7.1% | +23.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -37.7% | +40.6% | +23.7% | +82.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +87.2% | +194.4% | +86.2% | +120.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.5% | +259.7% | +54.9% | +95.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.1% | +373.3% | +465.7% | +269.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.3% | +43.3% | +23.0% | +30.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NTNX and HPE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTNX is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSTG's 2.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HPE currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs NTNX's 55.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.81x | 2.32x | 1.34x | 1.62x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $83.36 | $100.59 | $126.66 | $30.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $34.01 | $46.51 | $91.61 | $16.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +55.1% | +66.6% | +89.2% | +97.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.6 | 60.5 | 61.3 | 74.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.1M | 2.8M | 2.1M | 15.0M |
Analyst Outlook
HPE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NTNX as "Buy", PSTG as "Buy", NTAP as "Hold", HPE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 29.8% upside for NTNX (target: $60) vs -3.3% for HPE (target: $29). For income investors, HPE offers the higher dividend yield at 2.02% vs NTAP's 1.80%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $59.64 | $86.63 | $120.50 | $28.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 31 | 32 | 70 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.8% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.03 | $0.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.5% | +0.3% | +5.1% | +0.5% |
HPE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). PSTG leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
NTNX vs PSTG vs NTAP vs HPE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NTNX or PSTG or NTAP or HPE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nutanix, Inc.
(NTNX) is the stronger pick with 18. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 9% for NetApp, Inc. (NTAP). NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) offers the better valuation at 19. 9x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NTNX or PSTG or NTAP or HPE?
On trailing P/E, NetApp, Inc.
(NTAP) is the cheapest at 19. 9x versus Pure Storage, Inc. at 142. 5x. On forward P/E, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company is actually cheaper at 12. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NTNX or PSTG or NTAP or HPE?
Over the past 5 years, Pure Storage, Inc.
(PSTG) delivered a total return of +259. 7%, compared to +54. 9% for NetApp, Inc. (NTAP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTAP returned +465. 7% versus NTNX's +24. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NTNX or PSTG or NTAP or HPE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nutanix, Inc.
(NTNX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Pure Storage, Inc. 's 2. 32β — meaning PSTG is approximately 186% more volatile than NTNX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 3% for NetApp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NTNX or PSTG or NTAP or HPE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nutanix, Inc.
(NTNX) is pulling ahead at 18. 1% versus 4. 9% for NetApp, Inc. (NTAP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nutanix, Inc. grew EPS 227. 5% year-over-year, compared to -102. 3% for Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTNX leads at 17. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NTNX or PSTG or NTAP or HPE?
NetApp, Inc.
(NTAP) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 0% net margin versus 0. 2% for Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company — meaning it keeps 18. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NTAP leads at 20. 3% versus 3. 1% for PSTG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTNX leads at 86. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NTNX or PSTG or NTAP or HPE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (HPE) trades at 12.
3x forward P/E versus 29. 2x for Pure Storage, Inc. — 16. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NTNX: 29. 8% to $59. 64.
08Which pays a better dividend — NTNX or PSTG or NTAP or HPE?
In this comparison, HPE (2.
0% yield), NTAP (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. NTNX, PSTG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NTNX or PSTG or NTAP or HPE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NetApp, Inc.
(NTAP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 8% yield, +465. 7% 10Y return). Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG) carries a higher beta of 2. 32 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTAP: +465. 7%, PSTG: +373. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NTNX and PSTG and NTAP and HPE?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NTNX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PSTG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NTAP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HPE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. NTAP, HPE pay a dividend while NTNX, PSTG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.