Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NTNX vs SCSC vs PSTG vs AVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Technology Distributors
Computer Hardware
Technology Distributors
NTNX vs SCSC vs PSTG vs AVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Technology Distributors | Computer Hardware | Technology Distributors |
| Market Cap | $12.43B | $952M | $21.99B | $6.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.69B | $3.09B | $3.66B | $24.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $267M | $73M | $188M | $214M |
| Gross Margin | 87.1% | 13.5% | 70.4% | 10.5% |
| Operating Margin | 8.0% | 3.1% | 3.1% | 2.7% |
| Forward P/E | 25.1x | 11.0x | 29.2x | 16.2x |
| Total Debt | $1.48B | $147M | $216M | $2.88B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $770M | $126M | $855M | $192M |
NTNX vs SCSC vs PSTG vs AVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) | 100 | 190.9 | +90.9% |
| ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC) | 100 | 176.1 | +76.1% |
| Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG) | 100 | 335.4 | +235.4% |
| Avnet, Inc. (AVT) | 100 | 296.8 | +196.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NTNX vs SCSC vs PSTG vs AVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NTNX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.81
- Rev growth 18.1%, EPS growth 227.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.1%
- 18.1% revenue growth vs SCSC's -6.7%
- 9.9% margin vs AVT's 0.9%
SCSC is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (11.0x vs 16.2x)
PSTG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 373.3% 10Y total return vs AVT's 132.4%
AVT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.27, Low D/E 57.4%, current ratio 2.43x
- Beta 1.27, yield 1.6%, current ratio 2.43x
- 1.6% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
- +65.6% vs NTNX's -37.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.1% revenue growth vs SCSC's -6.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.0x vs 16.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.9% margin vs AVT's 0.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs PSTG's 2.32 | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +65.6% vs NTNX's -37.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.2% ROA vs AVT's 1.7%, ROIC 6.9% vs 6.0% |
NTNX vs SCSC vs PSTG vs AVT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NTNX vs SCSC vs PSTG vs AVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PSTG leads in 2 of 6 categories
NTNX leads 1 • SCSC leads 1 • AVT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTNX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVT is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.0B annually — 9.3x NTNX's $2.7B. NTNX is the more profitable business, keeping 9.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AVT's 0.9%. On growth, AVT holds the edge at +33.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.7B | $3.1B | $3.7B | $25.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $288M | $114M | $263M | $781M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $267M | $73M | $188M | $214M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $777M | $124M | $256M | $33M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +87.1% | +13.5% | +70.4% | +10.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +3.1% | +3.1% | +2.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | +2.4% | +5.1% | +0.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +28.9% | +4.0% | +7.0% | +0.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.4% | +8.8% | +20.4% | +33.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +89.5% | +5.4% | +141.7% | +12.9% |
Valuation Metrics
SCSC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, SCSC trades at a 90% valuation discount to PSTG's 142.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SCSC's 8.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PSTG's 81.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.4B | $952M | $22.0B | $6.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.1B | $973M | $21.3B | $9.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 70.66x | 14.47x | 142.49x | 29.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.15x | 10.98x | 29.20x | 16.22x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 53.61x | 8.43x | 81.28x | 12.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.90x | 0.31x | 6.00x | 0.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.14x | 16.03x | 1.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.57x | 9.15x | 35.71x | 11.47x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PSTG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PSTG delivers a 13.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $4 for AVT. PSTG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AVT's 0.57x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SCSC scores 7/9 vs AVT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +8.1% | +13.0% | +4.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.2% | +4.2% | +4.0% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.9% | +7.0% | +10.3% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.5% | +7.7% | +4.5% | +7.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.16x | 0.15x | 0.57x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $713M | $21M | -$639M | $2.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $770M | $126M | $855M | $192M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $147M | $216M | $2.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.48x | 11.00x | 28.04x | 2.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PSTG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PSTG five years ago would be worth $35,967 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,433 for SCSC. Over the past 12 months, AVT leads with a +65.6% total return vs NTNX's -37.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PSTG at 43.3% vs SCSC's 18.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.2% | +11.1% | -3.0% | +64.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -37.7% | +20.2% | +40.6% | +65.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +87.2% | +64.5% | +194.4% | +105.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.5% | +34.3% | +259.7% | +94.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.1% | +9.7% | +373.3% | +132.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.3% | +18.0% | +43.3% | +27.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NTNX and AVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTNX is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSTG's 2.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AVT currently trades 95.4% from its 52-week high vs NTNX's 55.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.81x | 1.48x | 2.32x | 1.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $83.36 | $46.25 | $100.59 | $84.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $34.01 | $33.76 | $46.51 | $44.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +55.1% | +93.8% | +66.6% | +95.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.6 | 60.3 | 60.5 | 76.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.1M | 204K | 2.8M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NTNX as "Buy", SCSC as "Hold", PSTG as "Buy", AVT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 29.8% upside for NTNX (target: $60) vs -1.9% for AVT (target: $79). AVT is the only dividend payer here at 1.60% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $59.64 | $43.00 | $86.63 | $79.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 31 | 5 | 32 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.5% | +11.2% | +0.3% | +4.6% |
PSTG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). NTNX leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
NTNX vs SCSC vs PSTG vs AVT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NTNX or SCSC or PSTG or AVT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nutanix, Inc.
(NTNX) is the stronger pick with 18. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 7% for ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC). ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (11. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NTNX or SCSC or PSTG or AVT?
On trailing P/E, ScanSource, Inc.
(SCSC) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus Pure Storage, Inc. at 142. 5x. On forward P/E, ScanSource, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NTNX or SCSC or PSTG or AVT?
Over the past 5 years, Pure Storage, Inc.
(PSTG) delivered a total return of +259. 7%, compared to +34. 3% for ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PSTG returned +373. 3% versus SCSC's +9. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NTNX or SCSC or PSTG or AVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nutanix, Inc.
(NTNX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Pure Storage, Inc. 's 2. 32β — meaning PSTG is approximately 186% more volatile than NTNX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 57% for Avnet, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NTNX or SCSC or PSTG or AVT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nutanix, Inc.
(NTNX) is pulling ahead at 18. 1% versus -6. 7% for ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nutanix, Inc. grew EPS 227. 5% year-over-year, compared to -49. 4% for Avnet, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTNX leads at 17. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NTNX or SCSC or PSTG or AVT?
Nutanix, Inc.
(NTNX) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 4% net margin versus 1. 1% for Avnet, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NTNX leads at 6. 8% versus 2. 8% for SCSC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTNX leads at 86. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NTNX or SCSC or PSTG or AVT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ScanSource, Inc.
(SCSC) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 29. 2x for Pure Storage, Inc. — 18. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NTNX: 29. 8% to $59. 64.
08Which pays a better dividend — NTNX or SCSC or PSTG or AVT?
In this comparison, AVT (1.
6% yield) pays a dividend. NTNX, SCSC, PSTG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NTNX or SCSC or PSTG or AVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Avnet, Inc.
(AVT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 27), 1. 6% yield, +132. 4% 10Y return). Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG) carries a higher beta of 2. 32 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AVT: +132. 4%, PSTG: +373. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NTNX and SCSC and PSTG and AVT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NTNX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SCSC is a small-cap deep-value stock; PSTG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. AVT pays a dividend while NTNX, SCSC, PSTG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.