Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NTWK vs INFU

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NTWK
NetSol Technologies, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$45M
5Y Perf.+20.7%
INFU
InfuSystem Holdings, Inc.

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareAMEX • US
Market Cap$206M
5Y Perf.-12.7%

NTWK vs INFU — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NTWK logoNTWK
INFU logoINFU
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationMedical - Instruments & Supplies
Market Cap$45M$206M
Revenue (TTM)$70M$143M
Net Income (TTM)$4M$10M
Gross Margin48.8%56.0%
Operating Margin6.0%8.3%
Forward P/E15.4x24.4x
Total Debt$9M$3M
Cash & Equiv.$17M$3M

NTWK vs INFULong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NTWK
INFU
StockMay 20May 26Return
NetSol Technologies… (NTWK)100120.7+20.7%
InfuSystem Holdings… (INFU)10087.3-12.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NTWK vs INFU

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NTWK and INFU are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
NTWK
NetSol Technologies, Inc.
The Income Pick

NTWK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.94
  • Rev growth 7.6%, EPS growth 316.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.94, Low D/E 21.6%, current ratio 2.35x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
INFU
InfuSystem Holdings, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

INFU is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 206.3% 10Y total return vs NTWK's -44.8%
  • 6.7% margin vs NTWK's 5.1%
  • +115.7% vs NTWK's +61.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNTWK logoNTWK7.6% revenue growth vs INFU's 6.4%
ValueNTWK logoNTWKLower P/E (15.4x vs 24.4x)
Quality / MarginsINFU logoINFU6.7% margin vs NTWK's 5.1%
Stability / SafetyNTWK logoNTWKBeta 0.94 vs INFU's 1.50
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)INFU logoINFU+115.7% vs NTWK's +61.8%
Efficiency (ROA)INFU logoINFU9.5% ROA vs NTWK's 5.7%, ROIC 12.5% vs 8.5%

NTWK vs INFU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NTWKNetSol Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Subscription and Support
49.8%$33M
Service
49.3%$33M
License
0.9%$598,633
INFUInfuSystem Holdings, Inc.
FY 2024
Patient Services
56.6%$80M
Device Solutions
43.4%$62M

NTWK vs INFU — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNTWKLAGGINGINFU

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

INFU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

INFU is the larger business by revenue, generating $143M annually — 2.1x NTWK's $70M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.7% (INFU) to 5.1% (NTWK). On growth, NTWK holds the edge at +21.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNTWK logoNTWKNetSol Technologi…INFU logoINFUInfuSystem Holdin…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$70M$143M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$5M$25M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$4M$10M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$1M$23M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+48.8%+56.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+6.0%+8.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+5.1%+6.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-1.5%+15.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+21.1%+7.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+120.0%+125.2%
INFU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NTWK leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.

At 15.4x trailing earnings, NTWK trades at a 53% valuation discount to INFU's 32.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NTWK's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than INFU's 8.2x.

MetricNTWK logoNTWKNetSol Technologi…INFU logoINFUInfuSystem Holdin…
Market CapShares × price$45M$206M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$37M$206M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS15.40x32.71x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.24.38x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.60x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.51x8.18x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.69x1.44x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.05x3.73x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.64x
NTWK leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

INFU leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

INFU delivers a 16.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $8 for NTWK. INFU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NTWK's 0.22x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INFU scores 8/9 vs NTWK's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricNTWK logoNTWKNetSol Technologi…INFU logoINFUInfuSystem Holdin…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+8.5%+16.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.7%+9.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+8.5%+12.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.4%+14.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–968
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.22x0.06x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$8M$241,000
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$17M$3M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$9M$3M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense13.34x8.42x
INFU leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NTWK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NTWK five years ago would be worth $9,080 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,913 for INFU. Over the past 12 months, INFU leads with a +115.7% total return vs NTWK's +61.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTWK at 16.1% vs INFU's 5.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNTWK logoNTWKNetSol Technologi…INFU logoINFUInfuSystem Holdin…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+32.8%+20.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+61.8%+115.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+56.5%+16.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-9.2%-50.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-44.8%+206.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+16.1%+5.2%
NTWK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NTWK and INFU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NTWK is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INFU's 1.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INFU currently trades 91.8% from its 52-week high vs NTWK's 67.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNTWK logoNTWKNetSol Technologi…INFU logoINFUInfuSystem Holdin…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.94x1.50x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.75$11.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.34$4.67
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+67.0%+91.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10051.860.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded27K110K
Evenly matched — NTWK and INFU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
MetricNTWK logoNTWKNetSol Technologi…INFU logoINFUInfuSystem Holdin…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$15.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts3
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.3%+5.3%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

INFU leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NTWK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallNetSol Technologies, Inc. (NTWK)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NTWK vs INFU: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NTWK or INFU a better buy right now?

For growth investors, NetSol Technologies, Inc.

(NTWK) is the stronger pick with 7. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 4% for InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. (INFU). NetSol Technologies, Inc. (NTWK) offers the better valuation at 15. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. (INFU) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NTWK or INFU?

On trailing P/E, NetSol Technologies, Inc.

(NTWK) is the cheapest at 15. 4x versus InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. at 32. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NTWK or INFU?

Over the past 5 years, NetSol Technologies, Inc.

(NTWK) delivered a total return of -9. 2%, compared to -50. 9% for InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. (INFU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INFU returned +206. 3% versus NTWK's -44. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NTWK or INFU?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NetSol Technologies, Inc.

(NTWK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 50β — meaning INFU is approximately 60% more volatile than NTWK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. (INFU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 22% for NetSol Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NTWK or INFU?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), NetSol Technologies, Inc.

(NTWK) is pulling ahead at 7. 6% versus 6. 4% for InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. (INFU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NetSol Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 316. 7% year-over-year, compared to 181. 8% for InfuSystem Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, INFU leads at 9. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NTWK or INFU?

InfuSystem Holdings, Inc.

(INFU) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 2% net margin versus 4. 4% for NetSol Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INFU leads at 8. 3% versus 5. 3% for NTWK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INFU leads at 56. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Which pays a better dividend — NTWK or INFU?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is NTWK or INFU better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, NetSol Technologies, Inc.

(NTWK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94)). InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. (INFU) carries a higher beta of 1. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTWK: -44. 8%, INFU: +206. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between NTWK and INFU?

These companies operate in different sectors (NTWK (Technology) and INFU (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: NTWK is a small-cap deep-value stock; INFU is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

NTWK

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

INFU

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform NTWK and INFU on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(NTWK: 21.1% · INFU: 7.0%)
Net Margin>
%
(NTWK: 5.1% · INFU: 6.7%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(NTWK: 15.4x · INFU: 32.7x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.