Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NTWK vs INFU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
NTWK vs INFU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $45M | $206M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $70M | $143M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $10M |
| Gross Margin | 48.8% | 56.0% |
| Operating Margin | 6.0% | 8.3% |
| Forward P/E | 15.4x | 24.4x |
| Total Debt | $9M | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17M | $3M |
NTWK vs INFU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NetSol Technologies… (NTWK) | 100 | 120.7 | +20.7% |
| InfuSystem Holdings… (INFU) | 100 | 87.3 | -12.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NTWK vs INFU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NTWK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.94
- Rev growth 7.6%, EPS growth 316.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.94, Low D/E 21.6%, current ratio 2.35x
INFU is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 206.3% 10Y total return vs NTWK's -44.8%
- 6.7% margin vs NTWK's 5.1%
- +115.7% vs NTWK's +61.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.6% revenue growth vs INFU's 6.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.4x vs 24.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.7% margin vs NTWK's 5.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs INFU's 1.50 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +115.7% vs NTWK's +61.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.5% ROA vs NTWK's 5.7%, ROIC 12.5% vs 8.5% |
NTWK vs INFU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NTWK vs INFU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INFU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INFU is the larger business by revenue, generating $143M annually — 2.1x NTWK's $70M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.7% (INFU) to 5.1% (NTWK). On growth, NTWK holds the edge at +21.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $70M | $143M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $25M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $10M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | $23M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.8% | +56.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +8.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.1% | +6.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.5% | +15.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.1% | +7.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +120.0% | +125.2% |
Valuation Metrics
NTWK leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.4x trailing earnings, NTWK trades at a 53% valuation discount to INFU's 32.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NTWK's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than INFU's 8.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $45M | $206M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $37M | $206M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.40x | 32.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 24.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.60x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.51x | 8.18x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.69x | 1.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.05x | 3.73x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
INFU leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INFU delivers a 16.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $8 for NTWK. INFU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NTWK's 0.22x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INFU scores 8/9 vs NTWK's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.5% | +16.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.7% | +9.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.5% | +12.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.4% | +14.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | $241,000 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17M | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $3M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 13.34x | 8.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTWK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NTWK five years ago would be worth $9,080 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,913 for INFU. Over the past 12 months, INFU leads with a +115.7% total return vs NTWK's +61.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTWK at 16.1% vs INFU's 5.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +32.8% | +20.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +61.8% | +115.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.5% | +16.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.2% | -50.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.8% | +206.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.1% | +5.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NTWK and INFU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTWK is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INFU's 1.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INFU currently trades 91.8% from its 52-week high vs NTWK's 67.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.94x | 1.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.75 | $11.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.34 | $4.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.0% | +91.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.8 | 60.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 27K | 110K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.3% | +5.3% |
INFU leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NTWK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
NTWK vs INFU: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NTWK or INFU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NetSol Technologies, Inc.
(NTWK) is the stronger pick with 7. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 4% for InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. (INFU). NetSol Technologies, Inc. (NTWK) offers the better valuation at 15. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. (INFU) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NTWK or INFU?
On trailing P/E, NetSol Technologies, Inc.
(NTWK) is the cheapest at 15. 4x versus InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. at 32. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NTWK or INFU?
Over the past 5 years, NetSol Technologies, Inc.
(NTWK) delivered a total return of -9. 2%, compared to -50. 9% for InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. (INFU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INFU returned +206. 3% versus NTWK's -44. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NTWK or INFU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NetSol Technologies, Inc.
(NTWK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 50β — meaning INFU is approximately 60% more volatile than NTWK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. (INFU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 22% for NetSol Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NTWK or INFU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NetSol Technologies, Inc.
(NTWK) is pulling ahead at 7. 6% versus 6. 4% for InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. (INFU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NetSol Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 316. 7% year-over-year, compared to 181. 8% for InfuSystem Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, INFU leads at 9. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NTWK or INFU?
InfuSystem Holdings, Inc.
(INFU) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 2% net margin versus 4. 4% for NetSol Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INFU leads at 8. 3% versus 5. 3% for NTWK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INFU leads at 56. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — NTWK or INFU?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is NTWK or INFU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NetSol Technologies, Inc.
(NTWK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94)). InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. (INFU) carries a higher beta of 1. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTWK: -44. 8%, INFU: +206. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NTWK and INFU?
These companies operate in different sectors (NTWK (Technology) and INFU (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NTWK is a small-cap deep-value stock; INFU is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.