Oil & Gas Energy
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NUAI vs AIOT vs TRAK vs GEOS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
Software - Application
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
NUAI vs AIOT vs TRAK vs GEOS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Energy | Communication Equipment | Software - Application | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $302M | $444M | $166M | $102M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $885K | $436M | $5.90B | $101M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-30M | $-32M | $1.99B | $-29M |
| Gross Margin | -28.7% | 55.2% | 86.3% | 14.3% |
| Operating Margin | -14.1% | 1.7% | 38.2% | -30.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 24.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $165K | $287M | $510K | $974K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $49M | $29M | $26M |
NUAI vs AIOT vs TRAK vs GEOS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT) | 100 | 71.3 | -28.7% |
| ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) | 100 | 59.5 | -40.5% |
| Geospace Technologi… (GEOS) | 100 | 88.3 | -11.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NUAI vs AIOT vs TRAK vs GEOS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NUAI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 12.5% 10Y total return vs TRAK's 2.0%
- +12.5% vs TRAK's -59.8%
AIOT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.65, yield 23.1%
- Rev growth 66.3%, EPS growth 60.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 42.2%
- 66.3% revenue growth vs GEOS's -18.3%
- 23.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs TRAK's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
TRAK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.09, Low D/E 1.0%, current ratio 6.09x
- Beta 1.09, yield 1.0%, current ratio 6.09x
- 33.7% margin vs NUAI's -33.4%
- Beta 1.09 vs NUAI's 3.09
GEOS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 66.3% revenue growth vs GEOS's -18.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 33.7% margin vs NUAI's -33.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs NUAI's 3.09 | |
| Dividends | 23.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs TRAK's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.5% vs TRAK's -59.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.8% ROA vs NUAI's -193.0% |
NUAI vs AIOT vs TRAK vs GEOS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NUAI vs AIOT vs TRAK vs GEOS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRAK leads in 2 of 6 categories
GEOS leads 1 • NUAI leads 1 • AIOT leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRAK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRAK is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.9B annually — 6664.5x NUAI's $885,400. TRAK is the more profitable business, keeping 33.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NUAI's -33.4%. On growth, TRAK holds the edge at +993.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $885,400 | $436M | $5.9B | $101M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | $69M | $2.4B | -$26M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$30M | -$32M | $2.0B | -$29M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$13M | $3M | $5.9B | -$32M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -28.7% | +55.2% | +86.3% | +14.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -14.1% | +1.7% | +38.2% | -30.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -33.4% | -7.4% | +33.7% | -28.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -15.1% | +0.6% | +99.1% | -31.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +47.4% | +993.8% | +9.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -25.5% | +1.8% | -11.7% |
Valuation Metrics
GEOS leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, TRAK's 18.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AIOT's 43.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $302M | $444M | $166M | $102M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $301M | $682M | $138M | $77M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.08x | -7.58x | 26.00x | -10.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 24.93x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.76x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 42.96x | 18.40x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 341.54x | 1.22x | 7.33x | 0.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.87x | 3.52x | 0.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 19.71x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TRAK leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRAK delivers a 15.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-16 for NUAI. GEOS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AIOT's 0.64x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRAK scores 7/9 vs GEOS's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.9% | -6.6% | +15.7% | -24.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -193.0% | -3.4% | +13.8% | -19.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -4.3% | +21.4% | -7.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.0% | -5.1% | +12.9% | -8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.64x | 0.01x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $238M | -$28M | -$25M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $49M | $29M | $26M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $165,000 | $287M | $509,973 | $974,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.60x | 0.47x | 0.62x | -187.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NUAI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NUAI five years ago would be worth $135,385 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,834 for AIOT. Over the past 12 months, NUAI leads with a +1253.8% total return vs TRAK's -59.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NUAI at 138.3% vs AIOT's -11.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +53.5% | -37.9% | -23.0% | -55.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1253.8% | -45.6% | -59.8% | +29.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1253.8% | -31.7% | +48.5% | -5.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1253.8% | -31.7% | +75.5% | -0.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1253.8% | -31.7% | +2.0% | -54.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +138.3% | -11.9% | +14.1% | -1.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NUAI and TRAK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TRAK is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NUAI's 3.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NUAI currently trades 55.9% from its 52-week high vs GEOS's 26.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.09x | 2.65x | 1.09x | 1.93x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.45 | $6.07 | $23.72 | $29.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.32 | $2.77 | $6.94 | $5.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +55.9% | +53.7% | +38.4% | +26.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.9 | 50.5 | 50.5 | 36.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.2M | 1.5M | 150K | 221K |
Analyst Outlook
AIOT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AIOT as "Buy", TRAK as "Buy", GEOS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 163.7% upside for TRAK (target: $24) vs 145.4% for AIOT (target: $8). For income investors, AIOT offers the higher dividend yield at 23.11% vs TRAK's 0.95%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.00 | $24.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | 1 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +23.1% | +1.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.75 | $0.09 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% | +1.9% | +0.6% |
TRAK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GEOS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
NUAI vs AIOT vs TRAK vs GEOS: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NUAI or AIOT or TRAK or GEOS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, New Era Energy & Digital, Inc.
(NUAI) is the stronger pick with 66. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 3% for Geospace Technologies Corporation (GEOS). ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) offers the better valuation at 26. 0x trailing P/E (24. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NUAI or AIOT or TRAK or GEOS?
Over the past 5 years, New Era Energy & Digital, Inc.
(NUAI) delivered a total return of +1254%, compared to -31. 7% for PowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NUAI returned +1254% versus GEOS's -54. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NUAI or AIOT or TRAK or GEOS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 09β versus New Era Energy & Digital, Inc. 's 3. 09β — meaning NUAI is approximately 184% more volatile than TRAK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Geospace Technologies Corporation (GEOS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 64% for PowerFleet, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NUAI or AIOT or TRAK or GEOS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), New Era Energy & Digital, Inc.
(NUAI) is pulling ahead at 66. 2% versus -18. 3% for Geospace Technologies Corporation (GEOS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PowerFleet, Inc. grew EPS 60. 6% year-over-year, compared to -52. 0% for Geospace Technologies Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIOT leads at 42. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NUAI or AIOT or TRAK or GEOS?
ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 9% net margin versus -33. 4% for New Era Energy & Digital, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRAK leads at 27. 5% versus -1405. 1% for NUAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRAK leads at 83. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is NUAI or AIOT or TRAK or GEOS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRAK: 163.
7% to $24. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — NUAI or AIOT or TRAK or GEOS?
In this comparison, AIOT (23.
1% yield), TRAK (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. NUAI, GEOS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is NUAI or AIOT or TRAK or GEOS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09), 1. 0% yield). Geospace Technologies Corporation (GEOS) carries a higher beta of 1. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRAK: +2. 0%, GEOS: -54. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NUAI and AIOT and TRAK and GEOS?
These companies operate in different sectors (NUAI (Energy) and AIOT (Technology) and TRAK (Technology) and GEOS (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NUAI is a small-cap high-growth stock; AIOT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TRAK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GEOS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. AIOT, TRAK pay a dividend while NUAI, GEOS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.