Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NVMI vs COHU vs ONTO vs MKSI vs ENTG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Semiconductors
NVMI vs COHU vs ONTO vs MKSI vs ENTG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $14.77B | $2.23B | $13.63B | $20.25B | $22.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $881M | $481M | $1.03B | $4.07B | $3.24B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $259M | $-56M | $106M | $327M | $265M |
| Gross Margin | 57.4% | 25.7% | 48.8% | 45.2% | 43.2% |
| Operating Margin | 28.8% | -10.6% | 10.0% | 14.8% | 29.1% |
| Forward P/E | 48.8x | 89.2x | 38.7x | 30.4x | 41.4x |
| Total Debt | $236M | $359M | $17M | $4.69B | $3.89B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $158M | $227M | $346M | $675M | $360M |
NVMI vs COHU vs ONTO vs MKSI vs ENTG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nova Ltd. (NVMI) | 100 | 1057.7 | +957.7% |
| Cohu, Inc. (COHU) | 100 | 315.3 | +215.3% |
| Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) | 100 | 881.7 | +781.7% |
| MKS Inc. (MKSI) | 100 | 284.8 | +184.8% |
| Entegris, Inc. (ENTG) | 100 | 246.6 | +146.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NVMI vs COHU vs ONTO vs MKSI vs ENTG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NVMI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 29.8%, EPS growth 34.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.3%
- 43.2% 10Y total return vs ONTO's 14.3%
- 29.8% revenue growth vs ENTG's -1.4%
- 29.4% margin vs COHU's -11.5%
COHU ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.13, Low D/E 45.8%, current ratio 6.88x
- Beta 2.13, current ratio 6.88x
- Beta 2.13 vs ENTG's 2.66, lower leverage
ONTO is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.12 vs NVMI's 1.35
MKSI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.64, yield 0.3%
- Lower P/E (30.4x vs 41.4x)
- 0.3% yield, vs ENTG's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
- +306.1% vs ENTG's +88.9%
Among these 5 stocks, ENTG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.8% revenue growth vs ENTG's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (30.4x vs 41.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.4% margin vs COHU's -11.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.13 vs ENTG's 2.66, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield, vs ENTG's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +306.1% vs ENTG's +88.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.0% ROA vs COHU's -4.9%, ROIC 14.9% vs -5.7% |
NVMI vs COHU vs ONTO vs MKSI vs ENTG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NVMI vs COHU vs ONTO vs MKSI vs ENTG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NVMI leads in 3 of 6 categories
COHU leads 2 • ONTO leads 0 • MKSI leads 0 • ENTG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVMI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MKSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 8.5x COHU's $481M. NVMI is the more profitable business, keeping 29.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COHU's -11.5%. On growth, COHU holds the edge at +29.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $881M | $481M | $1.0B | $4.1B | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $276M | -$11M | $158M | $945M | $1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $259M | -$56M | $106M | $327M | $265M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $218M | $32M | $239M | $401M | $721M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.4% | +25.7% | +48.8% | +45.2% | +43.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +28.8% | -10.6% | +10.0% | +14.8% | +29.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +29.4% | -11.5% | +10.3% | +8.0% | +8.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.7% | +6.6% | +23.2% | +9.8% | +22.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.3% | +29.3% | +9.5% | +15.2% | +5.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.8% | +60.6% | -48.5% | +53.2% | +46.3% |
Valuation Metrics
COHU leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 68.8x trailing earnings, MKSI trades at a 30% valuation discount to ONTO's 98.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NVMI offers better value at 2.43x vs ONTO's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14.8B | $2.2B | $13.6B | $20.2B | $22.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14.9B | $2.4B | $13.3B | $24.3B | $26.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 87.75x | -29.86x | 98.57x | 68.83x | 95.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 48.85x | 89.21x | 38.74x | 30.36x | 41.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.43x | — | 2.85x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 72.47x | — | 68.79x | 26.70x | 19.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 21.97x | 4.93x | 13.56x | 5.15x | 7.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 17.48x | 2.82x | 6.43x | 7.49x | 5.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 67.75x | 207.83x | 45.47x | 40.74x | 56.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVMI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVMI delivers a 19.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-7 for COHU. ONTO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKSI's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NVMI scores 8/9 vs ONTO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.7% | -6.8% | +5.2% | +12.2% | +6.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.0% | -4.9% | +4.7% | +3.7% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.9% | -5.7% | +5.7% | +6.5% | +9.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +20.7% | -5.9% | +6.5% | +7.2% | +11.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | 0.46x | 0.01x | 1.73x | 0.98x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $78M | $132M | -$329M | $4.0B | $3.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $158M | $227M | $346M | $675M | $360M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $236M | $359M | $17M | $4.7B | $3.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 116.20x | -168.82x | — | 2.84x | 2.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVMI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVMI five years ago would be worth $54,333 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,218 for COHU. Over the past 12 months, MKSI leads with a +306.1% total return vs ENTG's +88.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVMI at 75.7% vs COHU's 12.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +45.3% | +92.9% | +65.2% | +78.8% | +65.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +151.4% | +199.7% | +118.9% | +306.1% | +88.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +442.0% | +40.7% | +218.0% | +266.0% | +87.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +443.3% | +22.2% | +312.6% | +66.5% | +30.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4318.0% | +330.2% | +1431.7% | +750.6% | +1040.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +75.7% | +12.1% | +47.1% | +54.1% | +23.3% |
Risk & Volatility
COHU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
COHU is the less volatile stock with a 2.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ENTG's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. COHU currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs ONTO's 86.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.37x | 2.13x | 2.66x | 2.64x | 2.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $548.91 | $50.68 | $315.86 | $326.83 | $159.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $176.52 | $15.34 | $85.88 | $71.49 | $66.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.9% | +93.7% | +86.8% | +92.0% | +92.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.5 | 75.5 | 61.0 | 65.3 | 63.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 331K | 953K | 832K | 1.2M | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MKSI and ENTG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NVMI as "Buy", COHU as "Buy", ONTO as "Buy", MKSI as "Buy", ENTG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.5% upside for ONTO (target: $308) vs -9.3% for MKSI (target: $273). For income investors, MKSI offers the higher dividend yield at 0.29% vs ENTG's 0.27%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $489.50 | $49.75 | $308.33 | $272.86 | $152.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 14 | 11 | 29 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.3% | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.87 | $0.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.3% | +0.6% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
NVMI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). COHU leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
NVMI vs COHU vs ONTO vs MKSI vs ENTG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NVMI or COHU or ONTO or MKSI or ENTG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nova Ltd.
(NVMI) is the stronger pick with 29. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for Entegris, Inc. (ENTG). MKS Inc. (MKSI) offers the better valuation at 68. 8x trailing P/E (30. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nova Ltd. (NVMI) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NVMI or COHU or ONTO or MKSI or ENTG?
On trailing P/E, MKS Inc.
(MKSI) is the cheapest at 68. 8x versus Onto Innovation Inc. at 98. 6x. On forward P/E, MKS Inc. is actually cheaper at 30. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Onto Innovation Inc. wins at 1. 12x versus Nova Ltd. 's 1. 35x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NVMI or COHU or ONTO or MKSI or ENTG?
Over the past 5 years, Nova Ltd.
(NVMI) delivered a total return of +443. 3%, compared to +22. 2% for Cohu, Inc. (COHU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVMI returned +43. 2% versus COHU's +330. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NVMI or COHU or ONTO or MKSI or ENTG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cohu, Inc.
(COHU) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 13β versus Entegris, Inc. 's 2. 66β — meaning ENTG is approximately 25% more volatile than COHU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 173% for MKS Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NVMI or COHU or ONTO or MKSI or ENTG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nova Ltd.
(NVMI) is pulling ahead at 29. 8% versus -1. 4% for Entegris, Inc. (ENTG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MKS Inc. grew EPS 55. 5% year-over-year, compared to -31. 5% for Onto Innovation Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVMI leads at 17. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NVMI or COHU or ONTO or MKSI or ENTG?
Nova Ltd.
(NVMI) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 3% net margin versus -16. 4% for Cohu, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ENTG leads at 28. 9% versus -13. 3% for COHU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVMI leads at 57. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NVMI or COHU or ONTO or MKSI or ENTG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 12x versus Nova Ltd. 's 1. 35x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, MKS Inc. (MKSI) trades at 30. 4x forward P/E versus 89. 2x for Cohu, Inc. — 58. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ONTO: 12. 5% to $308. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — NVMI or COHU or ONTO or MKSI or ENTG?
In this comparison, MKSI (0.
3% yield), ENTG (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. NVMI, COHU, ONTO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NVMI or COHU or ONTO or MKSI or ENTG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Onto Innovation Inc.
(ONTO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1432% 10Y return). Nova Ltd. (NVMI) carries a higher beta of 2. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ONTO: +1432%, NVMI: +43. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NVMI and COHU and ONTO and MKSI and ENTG?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NVMI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; COHU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ONTO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MKSI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ENTG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.