Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NVMI vs COHU vs ONTO vs MKSI vs ENTG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NVMI
Nova Ltd.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$14.77B
5Y Perf.+957.7%
COHU
Cohu, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.23B
5Y Perf.+215.3%
ONTO
Onto Innovation Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$13.63B
5Y Perf.+781.7%
MKSI
MKS Inc.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$20.25B
5Y Perf.+184.8%
ENTG
Entegris, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$22.48B
5Y Perf.+146.6%

NVMI vs COHU vs ONTO vs MKSI vs ENTG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NVMI logoNVMI
COHU logoCOHU
ONTO logoONTO
MKSI logoMKSI
ENTG logoENTG
IndustrySemiconductorsSemiconductorsSemiconductorsHardware, Equipment & PartsSemiconductors
Market Cap$14.77B$2.23B$13.63B$20.25B$22.48B
Revenue (TTM)$881M$481M$1.03B$4.07B$3.24B
Net Income (TTM)$259M$-56M$106M$327M$265M
Gross Margin57.4%25.7%48.8%45.2%43.2%
Operating Margin28.8%-10.6%10.0%14.8%29.1%
Forward P/E48.8x89.2x38.7x30.4x41.4x
Total Debt$236M$359M$17M$4.69B$3.89B
Cash & Equiv.$158M$227M$346M$675M$360M

NVMI vs COHU vs ONTO vs MKSI vs ENTGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NVMI
COHU
ONTO
MKSI
ENTG
StockMay 20May 26Return
Nova Ltd. (NVMI)1001057.7+957.7%
Cohu, Inc. (COHU)100315.3+215.3%
Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO)100881.7+781.7%
MKS Inc. (MKSI)100284.8+184.8%
Entegris, Inc. (ENTG)100246.6+146.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NVMI vs COHU vs ONTO vs MKSI vs ENTG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NVMI and MKSI are tied at the top with 3 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. MKS Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. COHU also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
NVMI
Nova Ltd.
The Growth Play

NVMI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 29.8%, EPS growth 34.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.3%
  • 43.2% 10Y total return vs ONTO's 14.3%
  • 29.8% revenue growth vs ENTG's -1.4%
  • 29.4% margin vs COHU's -11.5%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
COHU
Cohu, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

COHU ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 2.13, Low D/E 45.8%, current ratio 6.88x
  • Beta 2.13, current ratio 6.88x
  • Beta 2.13 vs ENTG's 2.66, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
ONTO
Onto Innovation Inc.
The Value Pick

ONTO is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 1.12 vs NVMI's 1.35
Best for: valuation efficiency
MKSI
MKS Inc.
The Income Pick

MKSI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.64, yield 0.3%
  • Lower P/E (30.4x vs 41.4x)
  • 0.3% yield, vs ENTG's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
  • +306.1% vs ENTG's +88.9%
Best for: income & stability
ENTG
Entegris, Inc.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, ENTG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNVMI logoNVMI29.8% revenue growth vs ENTG's -1.4%
ValueMKSI logoMKSILower P/E (30.4x vs 41.4x)
Quality / MarginsNVMI logoNVMI29.4% margin vs COHU's -11.5%
Stability / SafetyCOHU logoCOHUBeta 2.13 vs ENTG's 2.66, lower leverage
DividendsMKSI logoMKSI0.3% yield, vs ENTG's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)MKSI logoMKSI+306.1% vs ENTG's +88.9%
Efficiency (ROA)NVMI logoNVMI11.0% ROA vs COHU's -4.9%, ROIC 14.9% vs -5.7%

NVMI vs COHU vs ONTO vs MKSI vs ENTG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NVMINova Ltd.
FY 2024
Product
100.0%$538M
COHUCohu, Inc.
FY 2014
Semiconductor Equipment
95.0%$317M
Microwave Communications Equipment
5.0%$17M
ONTOOnto Innovation Inc.
FY 2025
Systems And Software Revenue
84.3%$848M
Parts Revenue
8.4%$84M
Service Revenue
7.3%$73M
MKSIMKS Inc.
FY 2025
Product
87.4%$3.4B
Service
12.6%$495M
ENTGEntegris, Inc.
FY 2025
Advanced Purity Solutions
56.1%$1.8B
Materials Solutions MS
43.9%$1.4B

NVMI vs COHU vs ONTO vs MKSI vs ENTG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNVMILAGGINGENTG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NVMI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

MKSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 8.5x COHU's $481M. NVMI is the more profitable business, keeping 29.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COHU's -11.5%. On growth, COHU holds the edge at +29.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNVMI logoNVMINova Ltd.COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.ONTO logoONTOOnto Innovation I…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.ENTG logoENTGEntegris, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$881M$481M$1.0B$4.1B$3.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$276M-$11M$158M$945M$1.3B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$259M-$56M$106M$327M$265M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$218M$32M$239M$401M$721M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+57.4%+25.7%+48.8%+45.2%+43.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+28.8%-10.6%+10.0%+14.8%+29.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+29.4%-11.5%+10.3%+8.0%+8.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+24.7%+6.6%+23.2%+9.8%+22.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+14.3%+29.3%+9.5%+15.2%+5.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+22.8%+60.6%-48.5%+53.2%+46.3%
NVMI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

COHU leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 68.8x trailing earnings, MKSI trades at a 30% valuation discount to ONTO's 98.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NVMI offers better value at 2.43x vs ONTO's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricNVMI logoNVMINova Ltd.COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.ONTO logoONTOOnto Innovation I…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.ENTG logoENTGEntegris, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$14.8B$2.2B$13.6B$20.2B$22.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$14.9B$2.4B$13.3B$24.3B$26.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS87.75x-29.86x98.57x68.83x95.26x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.48.85x89.21x38.74x30.36x41.38x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.43x2.85x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple72.47x68.79x26.70x19.81x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue21.97x4.93x13.56x5.15x7.03x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share17.48x2.82x6.43x7.49x5.68x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF67.75x207.83x45.47x40.74x56.74x
COHU leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NVMI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

NVMI delivers a 19.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-7 for COHU. ONTO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKSI's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NVMI scores 8/9 vs ONTO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricNVMI logoNVMINova Ltd.COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.ONTO logoONTOOnto Innovation I…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.ENTG logoENTGEntegris, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+19.7%-6.8%+5.2%+12.2%+6.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+11.0%-4.9%+4.7%+3.7%+3.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+14.9%-5.7%+5.7%+6.5%+9.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+20.7%-5.9%+6.5%+7.2%+11.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–984465
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.25x0.46x0.01x1.73x0.98x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$78M$132M-$329M$4.0B$3.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$158M$227M$346M$675M$360M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$236M$359M$17M$4.7B$3.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense116.20x-168.82x2.84x2.47x
NVMI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NVMI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NVMI five years ago would be worth $54,333 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,218 for COHU. Over the past 12 months, MKSI leads with a +306.1% total return vs ENTG's +88.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVMI at 75.7% vs COHU's 12.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNVMI logoNVMINova Ltd.COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.ONTO logoONTOOnto Innovation I…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.ENTG logoENTGEntegris, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+45.3%+92.9%+65.2%+78.8%+65.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+151.4%+199.7%+118.9%+306.1%+88.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+442.0%+40.7%+218.0%+266.0%+87.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+443.3%+22.2%+312.6%+66.5%+30.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+4318.0%+330.2%+1431.7%+750.6%+1040.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+75.7%+12.1%+47.1%+54.1%+23.3%
NVMI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

COHU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

COHU is the less volatile stock with a 2.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ENTG's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. COHU currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs ONTO's 86.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNVMI logoNVMINova Ltd.COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.ONTO logoONTOOnto Innovation I…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.ENTG logoENTGEntegris, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.37x2.13x2.66x2.64x2.66x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$548.91$50.68$315.86$326.83$159.15
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$176.52$15.34$85.88$71.49$66.32
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+91.9%+93.7%+86.8%+92.0%+92.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10062.575.561.065.363.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded331K953K832K1.2M2.4M
COHU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — MKSI and ENTG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: NVMI as "Buy", COHU as "Buy", ONTO as "Buy", MKSI as "Buy", ENTG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.5% upside for ONTO (target: $308) vs -9.3% for MKSI (target: $273). For income investors, MKSI offers the higher dividend yield at 0.29% vs ENTG's 0.27%.

MetricNVMI logoNVMINova Ltd.COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.ONTO logoONTOOnto Innovation I…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.ENTG logoENTGEntegris, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$489.50$49.75$308.33$272.86$152.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1214112926
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.3%+0.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises002
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.87$0.40
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.2%+0.3%+0.6%+0.2%0.0%
Evenly matched — MKSI and ENTG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NVMI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). COHU leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.

Best OverallNova Ltd. (NVMI)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NVMI vs COHU vs ONTO vs MKSI vs ENTG: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NVMI or COHU or ONTO or MKSI or ENTG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Nova Ltd.

(NVMI) is the stronger pick with 29. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for Entegris, Inc. (ENTG). MKS Inc. (MKSI) offers the better valuation at 68. 8x trailing P/E (30. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nova Ltd. (NVMI) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NVMI or COHU or ONTO or MKSI or ENTG?

On trailing P/E, MKS Inc.

(MKSI) is the cheapest at 68. 8x versus Onto Innovation Inc. at 98. 6x. On forward P/E, MKS Inc. is actually cheaper at 30. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Onto Innovation Inc. wins at 1. 12x versus Nova Ltd. 's 1. 35x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NVMI or COHU or ONTO or MKSI or ENTG?

Over the past 5 years, Nova Ltd.

(NVMI) delivered a total return of +443. 3%, compared to +22. 2% for Cohu, Inc. (COHU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVMI returned +43. 2% versus COHU's +330. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NVMI or COHU or ONTO or MKSI or ENTG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cohu, Inc.

(COHU) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 13β versus Entegris, Inc. 's 2. 66β — meaning ENTG is approximately 25% more volatile than COHU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 173% for MKS Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NVMI or COHU or ONTO or MKSI or ENTG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nova Ltd.

(NVMI) is pulling ahead at 29. 8% versus -1. 4% for Entegris, Inc. (ENTG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MKS Inc. grew EPS 55. 5% year-over-year, compared to -31. 5% for Onto Innovation Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVMI leads at 17. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NVMI or COHU or ONTO or MKSI or ENTG?

Nova Ltd.

(NVMI) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 3% net margin versus -16. 4% for Cohu, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ENTG leads at 28. 9% versus -13. 3% for COHU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVMI leads at 57. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NVMI or COHU or ONTO or MKSI or ENTG more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 12x versus Nova Ltd. 's 1. 35x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, MKS Inc. (MKSI) trades at 30. 4x forward P/E versus 89. 2x for Cohu, Inc. — 58. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ONTO: 12. 5% to $308. 33.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NVMI or COHU or ONTO or MKSI or ENTG?

In this comparison, MKSI (0.

3% yield), ENTG (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. NVMI, COHU, ONTO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is NVMI or COHU or ONTO or MKSI or ENTG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Onto Innovation Inc.

(ONTO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1432% 10Y return). Nova Ltd. (NVMI) carries a higher beta of 2. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ONTO: +1432%, NVMI: +43. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NVMI and COHU and ONTO and MKSI and ENTG?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: NVMI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; COHU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ONTO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MKSI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ENTG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

NVMI

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

COHU

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ONTO

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MKSI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ENTG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform NVMI and COHU and ONTO and MKSI and ENTG on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(NVMI: 14.3% · COHU: 29.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.