Waste Management
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NVRI vs CECO vs PESI vs ERII
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Waste Management
Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
NVRI vs CECO vs PESI vs ERII — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Waste Management | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Waste Management | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls |
| Market Cap | $1.59B | $2.92B | $207M | $498M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.24B | $812M | $59M | $127M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-171M | $17M | $-18M | $33M |
| Gross Margin | 19.2% | 34.3% | 4.1% | 64.5% |
| Operating Margin | 1.0% | 7.6% | -26.3% | 24.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 48.8x | — | 22.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.81B | $25M | $4M | $9M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $104M | $33M | $12M | $48M |
NVRI vs CECO vs PESI vs ERII — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enviri Corporation (NVRI) | 100 | 172.1 | +72.1% |
| CECO Environmental … (CECO) | 100 | 1532.6 | +1432.6% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 199.8 | +99.8% |
| Energy Recovery, In… (ERII) | 100 | 122.7 | +22.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NVRI vs CECO vs PESI vs ERII
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NVRI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.18, yield 0.0%
- Beta 1.18 vs PESI's 1.85
- 0.0% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
CECO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 38.8%, EPS growth 280.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.4%
- 12.8% 10Y total return vs NVRI's 191.4%
- 38.8% revenue growth vs ERII's -7.1%
- +220.1% vs ERII's -37.3%
PESI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ERII carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.53, Low D/E 4.6%, current ratio 10.44x
- Beta 1.53, current ratio 10.44x
- Better valuation composite
- 25.9% margin vs PESI's -30.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 38.8% revenue growth vs ERII's -7.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.9% margin vs PESI's -30.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.18 vs PESI's 1.85 | |
| Dividends | 0.0% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +220.1% vs ERII's -37.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs PESI's -20.2%, ROIC 10.3% vs -21.7% |
NVRI vs CECO vs PESI vs ERII — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NVRI vs CECO vs PESI vs ERII — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ERII leads in 2 of 6 categories
CECO leads 1 • NVRI leads 1 • PESI leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ERII leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVRI is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.2B annually — 38.1x PESI's $59M. ERII is the more profitable business, keeping 25.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PESI's -30.1%. On growth, CECO holds the edge at +21.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.2B | $812M | $59M | $127M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $204M | $86M | -$14M | $41M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$171M | $17M | -$18M | $33M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$40M | $4M | -$14M | $27M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.2% | +34.3% | +4.1% | +64.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.0% | +7.6% | -26.3% | +24.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.6% | +2.1% | -30.1% | +25.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.8% | +0.5% | -23.4% | +21.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.4% | +21.5% | -20.1% | -97.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.9% | -91.8% | -110.5% | +100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NVRI and ERII each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.5x trailing earnings, ERII trades at a 62% valuation discount to CECO's 59.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NVRI's 12.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CECO's 38.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $2.9B | $207M | $498M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.3B | $2.9B | $200M | $460M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.23x | 59.40x | -14.89x | 22.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 48.83x | — | 22.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.39x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.15x | 38.01x | — | 16.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.71x | 3.77x | 3.36x | 3.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.24x | 9.22x | 4.11x | 2.48x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 28.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ERII leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ERII delivers a 17.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-44 for NVRI. ERII carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVRI's 6.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ERII scores 6/9 vs NVRI's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -43.7% | +5.4% | -34.5% | +17.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.2% | +1.9% | -20.2% | +15.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.3% | +10.0% | -21.7% | +10.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.2% | +9.4% | -16.7% | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 6.11x | 0.08x | 0.09x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.7B | -$8M | -$7M | -$39M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $104M | $33M | $12M | $48M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $25M | $4M | $9M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.10x | 2.74x | -42.14x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CECO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CECO five years ago would be worth $110,271 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,567 for ERII. Over the past 12 months, CECO leads with a +220.1% total return vs ERII's -37.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CECO at 88.7% vs ERII's -26.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.3% | +36.1% | -8.8% | -31.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +170.5% | +220.1% | +26.2% | -37.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.2% | +572.0% | +21.7% | -60.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.8% | +1002.7% | +45.6% | -54.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +191.4% | +1281.8% | +178.6% | -11.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.1% | +88.7% | +6.8% | -26.3% |
Risk & Volatility
NVRI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NVRI is the less volatile stock with a 1.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PESI's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVRI currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs ERII's 51.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.18x | 1.36x | 1.85x | 1.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.98 | $90.25 | $16.50 | $18.32 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.87 | $24.71 | $8.02 | $9.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.1% | +90.2% | +67.7% | +51.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.3 | 75.7 | 41.5 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 673K | 164K | 996K |
Analyst Outlook
PESI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NVRI as "Buy", CECO as "Buy", PESI as "Hold", ERII as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.1% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs 5.9% for CECO (target: $86).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.00 | $86.20 | $18.00 | $13.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 15 | 1 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.0% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.00 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +7.2% |
ERII leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CECO leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
NVRI vs CECO vs PESI vs ERII: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NVRI or CECO or PESI or ERII a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CECO Environmental Corp.
(CECO) is the stronger pick with 38. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 1% for Energy Recovery, Inc. (ERII). Energy Recovery, Inc. (ERII) offers the better valuation at 22. 5x trailing P/E (22. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Enviri Corporation (NVRI) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NVRI or CECO or PESI or ERII?
On trailing P/E, Energy Recovery, Inc.
(ERII) is the cheapest at 22. 5x versus CECO Environmental Corp. at 59. 4x. On forward P/E, Energy Recovery, Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NVRI or CECO or PESI or ERII?
Over the past 5 years, CECO Environmental Corp.
(CECO) delivered a total return of +1003%, compared to -54. 3% for Energy Recovery, Inc. (ERII). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CECO returned +1282% versus ERII's -11. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NVRI or CECO or PESI or ERII?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Enviri Corporation (NVRI) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
18β versus Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning PESI is approximately 56% more volatile than NVRI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Energy Recovery, Inc. (ERII) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 6% for Enviri Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NVRI or CECO or PESI or ERII?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CECO Environmental Corp.
(CECO) is pulling ahead at 38. 8% versus -7. 1% for Energy Recovery, Inc. (ERII). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CECO Environmental Corp. grew EPS 280. 6% year-over-year, compared to -30. 0% for Enviri Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CECO leads at 22. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NVRI or CECO or PESI or ERII?
Energy Recovery, Inc.
(ERII) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 0% net margin versus -22. 3% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ERII leads at 18. 2% versus -19. 0% for PESI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ERII leads at 65. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NVRI or CECO or PESI or ERII more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Energy Recovery, Inc.
(ERII) trades at 22. 9x forward P/E versus 48. 8x for CECO Environmental Corp. — 25. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PESI: 61. 1% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NVRI or CECO or PESI or ERII?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is NVRI or CECO or PESI or ERII better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CECO Environmental Corp.
(CECO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1282% 10Y return). Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CECO: +1282%, PESI: +178. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NVRI and CECO and PESI and ERII?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NVRI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CECO is a small-cap high-growth stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ERII is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.