Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NVT vs ETN vs ATKR vs HUBB vs AYI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
NVT vs ETN vs ATKR vs HUBB vs AYI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Industrial - Machinery | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $26.96B | $155.02B | $2.50B | $26.21B | $9.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.33B | $28.52B | $2.87B | $6.00B | $4.54B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $492M | $3.99B | $-120M | $906M | $410M |
| Gross Margin | 37.0% | 36.9% | 19.9% | 35.5% | 48.1% |
| Operating Margin | 15.8% | 18.1% | 4.8% | 20.8% | 13.0% |
| Forward P/E | 39.7x | 30.0x | 14.0x | 25.0x | 15.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.56B | $11.17B | $932M | $2.61B | $1.00B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $238M | $622M | $507M | $483M | $423M |
NVT vs ETN vs ATKR vs HUBB vs AYI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| nVent Electric plc (NVT) | 100 | 909.6 | +809.6% |
| Eaton Corporation p… (ETN) | 100 | 470.2 | +370.2% |
| Atkore Inc. (ATKR) | 100 | 275.6 | +175.6% |
| Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) | 100 | 402.8 | +302.8% |
| Acuity Brands, Inc. (AYI) | 100 | 342.9 | +242.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NVT vs ETN vs ATKR vs HUBB vs AYI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NVT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 29.5%, EPS growth 118.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.3%
- 29.5% revenue growth vs ATKR's -11.0%
- +178.6% vs ATKR's +12.1%
ETN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 6.1% 10Y total return vs NVT's 5.8%
ATKR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (14.0x vs 25.0x)
- 1.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs ETN's 1.0%
HUBB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.38, yield 1.1%
- Beta 1.38, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.72x
- 15.1% margin vs ATKR's -4.2%
- Beta 1.38 vs ATKR's 1.69
AYI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.40, Low D/E 36.9%, current ratio 1.95x
- PEG 1.02 vs ETN's 1.22
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.5% revenue growth vs ATKR's -11.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.0x vs 25.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.1% margin vs ATKR's -4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.38 vs ATKR's 1.69 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs ETN's 1.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +178.6% vs ATKR's +12.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.6% ROA vs ATKR's -4.2%, ROIC 17.1% vs 9.0% |
NVT vs ETN vs ATKR vs HUBB vs AYI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NVT vs ETN vs ATKR vs HUBB vs AYI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HUBB leads in 2 of 6 categories
ATKR leads 1 • NVT leads 1 • ETN leads 0 • AYI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HUBB leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ETN is the larger business by revenue, generating $28.5B annually — 9.9x ATKR's $2.9B. HUBB is the more profitable business, keeping 15.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATKR's -4.2%. On growth, NVT holds the edge at +53.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.3B | $28.5B | $2.9B | $6.0B | $4.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $848M | $5.9B | $291M | $1.5B | $711M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $492M | $4.0B | -$120M | $906M | $410M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $387M | $4.7B | $133M | $909M | $535M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.0% | +36.9% | +19.9% | +35.5% | +48.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +18.1% | +4.8% | +20.8% | +13.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.4% | +14.0% | -4.2% | +15.1% | +9.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.9% | +16.5% | +4.6% | +15.2% | +11.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +53.5% | +16.8% | +4.2% | +11.1% | +20.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -59.7% | -9.4% | +70.1% | +8.3% | +13.7% |
Valuation Metrics
ATKR leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.6x trailing earnings, AYI trades at a 39% valuation discount to NVT's 38.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HUBB offers better value at 1.43x vs AYI's 1.59x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $27.0B | $155.0B | $2.5B | $26.2B | $9.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $28.3B | $165.6B | $2.9B | $28.3B | $9.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 38.68x | 38.17x | -164.38x | 29.81x | 23.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 39.70x | 30.00x | 14.02x | 25.01x | 15.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.55x | — | 1.43x | 1.59x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 34.30x | 27.69x | 7.35x | 20.81x | 13.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.93x | 5.65x | 0.88x | 4.48x | 2.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.36x | 7.99x | 1.80x | 6.85x | 3.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 72.49x | 34.67x | 8.44x | 29.97x | 17.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HUBB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HUBB delivers a 24.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-9 for ATKR. AYI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HUBB's 0.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HUBB scores 7/9 vs AYI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.4% | +20.8% | -8.7% | +24.4% | +14.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.2% | +9.0% | -4.2% | +11.6% | +8.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.9% | +13.6% | +9.0% | +17.1% | +16.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.5% | +16.8% | +9.8% | +20.1% | +16.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.42x | 0.57x | 0.67x | 0.68x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | $10.5B | $425M | $2.1B | $582M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $238M | $622M | $507M | $483M | $423M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.6B | $11.2B | $932M | $2.6B | $1.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.61x | 16.38x | 1.68x | 16.90x | 11.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVT five years ago would be worth $53,671 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,629 for ATKR. Over the past 12 months, NVT leads with a +178.6% total return vs ATKR's +12.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVT at 59.8% vs ATKR's -15.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +56.5% | +22.3% | +15.3% | +6.8% | -20.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +178.6% | +33.2% | +12.1% | +41.5% | +17.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +308.2% | +141.3% | -39.8% | +87.9% | +87.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +436.7% | +182.8% | -13.7% | +159.4% | +55.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +576.7% | +608.7% | +380.6% | +410.7% | +21.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +59.8% | +34.1% | -15.6% | +23.4% | +23.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NVT and HUBB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HUBB is the less volatile stock with a 1.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ATKR's 1.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVT currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs AYI's 77.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.68x | 1.42x | 1.69x | 1.38x | 1.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $174.50 | $435.43 | $80.06 | $565.50 | $380.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $59.73 | $296.93 | $53.49 | $349.40 | $250.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.5% | +91.7% | +92.4% | +87.2% | +77.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 82.3 | 59.8 | 64.1 | 41.2 | 58.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.3M | 2.5M | 384K | 546K | 444K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ETN and ATKR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NVT as "Buy", ETN as "Buy", ATKR as "Hold", HUBB as "Hold", AYI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 32.9% upside for AYI (target: $393) vs -19.6% for NVT (target: $134). For income investors, ATKR offers the higher dividend yield at 1.76% vs AYI's 0.22%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $134.00 | $379.78 | $74.00 | $535.14 | $392.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 39 | 11 | 17 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | +1.0% | +1.8% | +1.1% | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 24 | 2 | 12 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.79 | $4.17 | $1.30 | $5.35 | $0.65 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | +1.2% | +4.0% | +0.9% | +1.3% |
HUBB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ATKR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
NVT vs ETN vs ATKR vs HUBB vs AYI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NVT or ETN or ATKR or HUBB or AYI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, nVent Electric plc (NVT) is the stronger pick with 29.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 0% for Atkore Inc. (ATKR). Acuity Brands, Inc. (AYI) offers the better valuation at 23. 6x trailing P/E (15. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate nVent Electric plc (NVT) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NVT or ETN or ATKR or HUBB or AYI?
On trailing P/E, Acuity Brands, Inc.
(AYI) is the cheapest at 23. 6x versus nVent Electric plc at 38. 7x. On forward P/E, Atkore Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Acuity Brands, Inc. wins at 1. 02x versus Eaton Corporation plc's 1. 22x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NVT or ETN or ATKR or HUBB or AYI?
Over the past 5 years, nVent Electric plc (NVT) delivered a total return of +436.
7%, compared to -13. 7% for Atkore Inc. (ATKR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ETN returned +608. 7% versus AYI's +21. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NVT or ETN or ATKR or HUBB or AYI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
38β versus Atkore Inc. 's 1. 69β — meaning ATKR is approximately 23% more volatile than HUBB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Acuity Brands, Inc. (AYI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 68% for Hubbell Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NVT or ETN or ATKR or HUBB or AYI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), nVent Electric plc (NVT) is pulling ahead at 29.
5% versus -11. 0% for Atkore Inc. (ATKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: nVent Electric plc grew EPS 118. 8% year-over-year, compared to -103. 5% for Atkore Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVT leads at 19. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NVT or ETN or ATKR or HUBB or AYI?
nVent Electric plc (NVT) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
2% net margin versus -0. 5% for Atkore Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HUBB leads at 20. 8% versus 8. 3% for ATKR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AYI leads at 47. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NVT or ETN or ATKR or HUBB or AYI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Acuity Brands, Inc. (AYI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 02x versus Eaton Corporation plc's 1. 22x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Atkore Inc. (ATKR) trades at 14. 0x forward P/E versus 39. 7x for nVent Electric plc — 25. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AYI: 32. 9% to $392. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — NVT or ETN or ATKR or HUBB or AYI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Atkore Inc. (ATKR) offers the highest yield at 1. 8%, versus 0. 2% for Acuity Brands, Inc. (AYI).
09Is NVT or ETN or ATKR or HUBB or AYI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
0% yield, +608. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ETN: +608. 7%, AYI: +21. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NVT and ETN and ATKR and HUBB and AYI?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NVT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ETN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ATKR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HUBB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AYI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ETN, ATKR, HUBB pay a dividend while NVT, AYI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.