Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NVTS vs ALGM vs MPWR vs WOLF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
NVTS vs ALGM vs MPWR vs WOLF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $3.64B | $8.88B | $77.41B | $2.03B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $40M | $840M | $2.79B | $713M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-134M | $-13M | $616M | $-1.58B |
| Gross Margin | 18.4% | 45.0% | 55.2% | -31.0% |
| Operating Margin | -231.2% | -0.0% | 26.1% | -141.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 90.2x | 73.1x | — |
| Total Debt | $6M | $368M | $24M | $6.55B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $237M | $121M | $1.10B | $467M |
NVTS vs ALGM vs MPWR vs WOLF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Navitas Semiconduct… (NVTS) | 100 | 148.3 | +48.3% |
| Allegro MicroSystem… (ALGM) | 100 | 171.7 | +71.7% |
| Monolithic Power Sy… (MPWR) | 100 | 443.6 | +343.6% |
| Wolfspeed, Inc. (WOLF) | 100 | 44.6 | -55.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NVTS vs ALGM vs MPWR vs WOLF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NVTS plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
ALGM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MPWR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 2.28, yield 0.4%
- Rev growth 26.4%, EPS growth -65.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.9%
- 24.9% 10Y total return vs ALGM's 170.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.28, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 5.91x
WOLF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +10.0% vs MPWR's +148.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.4% revenue growth vs NVTS's -44.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.1% margin vs NVTS's -330.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.28 vs NVTS's 4.43, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +10.0% vs MPWR's +148.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs WOLF's -31.7%, ROIC 22.2% vs -17.1% |
NVTS vs ALGM vs MPWR vs WOLF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NVTS vs ALGM vs MPWR vs WOLF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MPWR leads in 6 of 6 categories
NVTS leads 0 • ALGM leads 0 • WOLF leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MPWR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MPWR is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.8B annually — 68.9x NVTS's $40M. MPWR is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVTS's -3.3%. On growth, ALGM holds the edge at +28.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $40M | $840M | $2.8B | $713M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$77M | $66M | $781M | -$808M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$134M | -$13M | $616M | -$1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$48M | $121M | $664M | -$750M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +45.0% | +55.2% | -31.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | -0.0% | +26.1% | -141.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.3% | -1.6% | +22.1% | -2.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -117.4% | +14.4% | +23.8% | -105.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -38.7% | +28.9% | +20.8% | -19.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -66.7% | +2.2% | -88.4% | +94.4% |
Valuation Metrics
MPWR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MPWR's 97.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALGM's 204.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.6B | $8.9B | $77.4B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.4B | $9.1B | $76.3B | $8.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -27.70x | -122.90x | 123.60x | -1.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 90.21x | 73.12x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 4.19x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 204.21x | 97.90x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 79.37x | 12.25x | 27.74x | 2.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.32x | 9.66x | 21.56x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 404.45x | 116.20x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MPWR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MPWR delivers a 17.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-52 for WOLF. MPWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALGM's 0.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MPWR scores 6/9 vs WOLF's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -33.0% | -1.4% | +17.9% | -52.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -28.8% | -0.9% | +15.2% | -31.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -27.2% | -1.3% | +22.2% | -17.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -21.4% | -1.5% | +20.4% | -37.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.40x | 0.01x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$230M | $247M | -$1.1B | $6.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $237M | $121M | $1.1B | $467M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $368M | $24M | $6.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -114.40x | -0.24x | — | -7.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MPWR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MPWR five years ago would be worth $46,617 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,710 for WOLF. Over the past 12 months, WOLF leads with a +996.4% total return vs MPWR's +148.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MPWR at 56.1% vs WOLF's 2.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +88.4% | +78.1% | +68.5% | +138.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +705.6% | +156.4% | +148.6% | +996.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +144.0% | +27.4% | +280.3% | +9.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.0% | +93.3% | +366.2% | -52.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.1% | +170.8% | +2494.7% | +94.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.6% | +8.4% | +56.1% | +2.9% |
Risk & Volatility
MPWR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MPWR is the less volatile stock with a 2.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVTS's 4.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MPWR currently trades 94.8% from its 52-week high vs NVTS's 79.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 4.43x | 2.43x | 2.28x | 3.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.79 | $51.40 | $1662.00 | $49.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.83 | $18.17 | $613.00 | $0.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.8% | +93.2% | +94.8% | +92.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.2 | 78.8 | 71.0 | 76.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 26.7M | 1.9M | 577K | 3.0M |
Analyst Outlook
MPWR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NVTS as "Hold", ALGM as "Buy", MPWR as "Buy", WOLF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 2.5% upside for MPWR (target: $1615) vs -66.3% for NVTS (target: $5). MPWR is the only dividend payer here at 0.37% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.32 | $44.83 | $1615.00 | $20.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 13 | 25 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 8 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $5.90 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +9.6% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
MPWR leads in 6 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
NVTS vs ALGM vs MPWR vs WOLF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NVTS or ALGM or MPWR or WOLF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is the stronger pick with 26. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -44. 9% for Navitas Semiconductor Corporation (NVTS). Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) offers the better valuation at 123. 6x trailing P/E (73. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. (ALGM) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NVTS or ALGM or MPWR or WOLF?
On forward P/E, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 73. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NVTS or ALGM or MPWR or WOLF?
Over the past 5 years, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) delivered a total return of +366. 2%, compared to -52. 9% for Wolfspeed, Inc. (WOLF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MPWR returned +24. 9% versus NVTS's +45. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NVTS or ALGM or MPWR or WOLF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 28β versus Navitas Semiconductor Corporation's 4. 43β — meaning NVTS is approximately 94% more volatile than MPWR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 40% for Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NVTS or ALGM or MPWR or WOLF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is pulling ahead at 26. 4% versus -44. 9% for Navitas Semiconductor Corporation (NVTS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Navitas Semiconductor Corporation grew EPS -23. 9% year-over-year, compared to -150. 0% for Allegro MicroSystems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MPWR leads at 15. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NVTS or ALGM or MPWR or WOLF?
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 1% net margin versus -254. 7% for Navitas Semiconductor Corporation — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MPWR leads at 26. 1% versus -190. 0% for NVTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MPWR leads at 55. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NVTS or ALGM or MPWR or WOLF more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) trades at 73. 1x forward P/E versus 90. 2x for Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. — 17. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MPWR: 2. 5% to $1615. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NVTS or ALGM or MPWR or WOLF?
In this comparison, MPWR (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. NVTS, ALGM, WOLF do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NVTS or ALGM or MPWR or WOLF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Allegro MicroSystems, Inc.
(ALGM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+170. 8% 10Y return). Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALGM: +170. 8%, MPWR: +24. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NVTS and ALGM and MPWR and WOLF?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NVTS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALGM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MPWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; WOLF is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.