Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NVTS vs WOLF vs AEHR vs MPWR vs ALGM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NVTS
Navitas Semiconductor Corporation

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • IE
Market Cap$3.64B
5Y Perf.+48.3%
WOLF
Wolfspeed, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.03B
5Y Perf.-55.4%
AEHR
Aehr Test Systems

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.79B
5Y Perf.+3885.2%
MPWR
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$77.41B
5Y Perf.+343.6%
ALGM
Allegro MicroSystems, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$8.88B
5Y Perf.+71.7%

NVTS vs WOLF vs AEHR vs MPWR vs ALGM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NVTS logoNVTS
WOLF logoWOLF
AEHR logoAEHR
MPWR logoMPWR
ALGM logoALGM
IndustrySemiconductorsSemiconductorsSemiconductorsSemiconductorsSemiconductors
Market Cap$3.64B$2.03B$2.79B$77.41B$8.88B
Revenue (TTM)$40M$713M$49M$2.79B$840M
Net Income (TTM)$-134M$-1.58B$-11M$616M$-13M
Gross Margin18.4%-31.0%30.2%55.2%45.0%
Operating Margin-231.2%-141.1%-27.8%26.1%-0.0%
Forward P/E73.1x90.2x
Total Debt$6M$6.55B$11M$24M$368M
Cash & Equiv.$237M$467M$25M$1.10B$121M

NVTS vs WOLF vs AEHR vs MPWR vs ALGMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NVTS
WOLF
AEHR
MPWR
ALGM
StockJan 21May 26Return
Navitas Semiconduct… (NVTS)100148.3+48.3%
Wolfspeed, Inc. (WOLF)10044.6-55.4%
Aehr Test Systems (AEHR)1003985.2+3885.2%
Monolithic Power Sy… (MPWR)100443.6+343.6%
Allegro MicroSystem… (ALGM)100171.7+71.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NVTS vs WOLF vs AEHR vs MPWR vs ALGM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MPWR leads in 6 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Wolfspeed, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
NVTS
Navitas Semiconductor Corporation
The Technology Pick

NVTS plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: technology exposure
WOLF
Wolfspeed, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

WOLF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.

  • +10.0% vs MPWR's +148.6%
Best for: momentum
AEHR
Aehr Test Systems
The Long-Run Compounder

AEHR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 70.3% 10Y total return vs MPWR's 24.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
MPWR
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
The Income Pick

MPWR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 2.28, yield 0.4%
  • Rev growth 26.4%, EPS growth -65.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 2.28, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 5.91x
  • Beta 2.28, yield 0.4%, current ratio 5.91x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
ALGM
Allegro MicroSystems, Inc.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, ALGM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMPWR logoMPWR26.4% revenue growth vs NVTS's -44.9%
ValueMPWR logoMPWRLower P/E (73.1x vs 90.2x)
Quality / MarginsMPWR logoMPWR22.1% margin vs NVTS's -330.7%
Stability / SafetyMPWR logoMPWRBeta 2.28 vs AEHR's 4.77, lower leverage
DividendsMPWR logoMPWR0.4% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)WOLF logoWOLF+10.0% vs MPWR's +148.6%
Efficiency (ROA)MPWR logoMPWR15.2% ROA vs WOLF's -31.7%, ROIC 22.2% vs -17.1%

NVTS vs WOLF vs AEHR vs MPWR vs ALGM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NVTSNavitas Semiconductor Corporation
FY 2024
Reportable Segment
100.0%$83M
WOLFWolfspeed, Inc.
FY 2025
Power Products
100.0%$414M
AEHRAehr Test Systems
FY 2024
Contactors
56.7%$38M
Systems
36.5%$24M
Services
6.8%$4M
MPWRMonolithic Power Systems, Inc.
FY 2023
DC To DC Products
94.4%$1.7B
Lighting Control Products
5.6%$102M
ALGMAllegro MicroSystems, Inc.
FY 2025
Magnetic Sensors And Other
65.5%$475M
Power Integrated Circuits
34.5%$250M

NVTS vs WOLF vs AEHR vs MPWR vs ALGM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMPWRLAGGINGALGM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MPWR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

MPWR is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.8B annually — 68.9x NVTS's $40M. MPWR is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVTS's -3.3%. On growth, ALGM holds the edge at +28.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNVTS logoNVTSNavitas Semicondu…WOLF logoWOLFWolfspeed, Inc.AEHR logoAEHRAehr Test SystemsMPWR logoMPWRMonolithic Power …ALGM logoALGMAllegro MicroSyst…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$40M$713M$49M$2.8B$840M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$77M-$808M-$10M$781M$66M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$134M-$1.6B-$11M$616M-$13M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$48M-$750M-$14M$664M$121M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+18.4%-31.0%+30.2%+55.2%+45.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-2.3%-141.1%-27.8%+26.1%-0.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-3.3%-2.2%-22.7%+22.1%-1.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-117.4%-105.3%-28.1%+23.8%+14.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-38.7%-19.0%-26.5%+20.8%+28.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-66.7%+94.4%-2.2%-88.4%+2.2%
MPWR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MPWR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, MPWR's 97.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALGM's 204.2x.

MetricNVTS logoNVTSNavitas Semicondu…WOLF logoWOLFWolfspeed, Inc.AEHR logoAEHRAehr Test SystemsMPWR logoMPWRMonolithic Power …ALGM logoALGMAllegro MicroSyst…
Market CapShares × price$3.6B$2.0B$2.8B$77.4B$8.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.4B$8.1B$2.8B$76.3B$9.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-27.70x-1.32x-702.00x123.60x-122.90x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.73.12x90.21x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.19x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple97.90x204.21x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue79.37x2.68x47.39x27.74x12.25x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share7.32x21.97x21.56x9.66x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF116.20x404.45x
MPWR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MPWR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

MPWR delivers a 17.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-52 for WOLF. MPWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALGM's 0.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MPWR scores 6/9 vs AEHR's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricNVTS logoNVTSNavitas Semicondu…WOLF logoWOLFWolfspeed, Inc.AEHR logoAEHRAehr Test SystemsMPWR logoMPWRMonolithic Power …ALGM logoALGMAllegro MicroSyst…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-33.0%-52.1%-8.5%+17.9%-1.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-28.8%-31.7%-7.5%+15.2%-0.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital-27.2%-17.1%-3.0%+22.2%-1.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-21.4%-37.5%-3.2%+20.4%-1.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–922163
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.09x0.01x0.40x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$230M$6.1B-$14M-$1.1B$247M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$237M$467M$25M$1.1B$121M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$6M$6.5B$11M$24M$368M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-114.40x-7.31x-0.24x
MPWR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AEHR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AEHR five years ago would be worth $398,515 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,710 for WOLF. Over the past 12 months, WOLF leads with a +996.4% total return vs MPWR's +148.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MPWR at 56.1% vs WOLF's 2.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNVTS logoNVTSNavitas Semicondu…WOLF logoWOLFWolfspeed, Inc.AEHR logoAEHRAehr Test SystemsMPWR logoMPWRMonolithic Power …ALGM logoALGMAllegro MicroSyst…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+88.4%+138.0%+311.8%+68.5%+78.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+705.6%+996.4%+991.6%+148.6%+156.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+144.0%+9.1%+242.3%+280.3%+27.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+59.0%-52.9%+3885.1%+366.2%+93.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+45.1%+94.7%+7029.7%+2494.7%+170.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+34.6%+2.9%+50.7%+56.1%+8.4%
AEHR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

MPWR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

MPWR is the less volatile stock with a 2.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AEHR's 4.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MPWR currently trades 94.8% from its 52-week high vs NVTS's 79.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNVTS logoNVTSNavitas Semicondu…WOLF logoWOLFWolfspeed, Inc.AEHR logoAEHRAehr Test SystemsMPWR logoMPWRMonolithic Power …ALGM logoALGMAllegro MicroSyst…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5004.43x3.11x4.77x2.28x2.43x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$19.79$49.00$102.48$1662.00$51.40
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.83$0.39$8.06$613.00$18.17
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+79.8%+92.0%+89.1%+94.8%+93.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10060.276.467.671.078.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded26.7M3.0M3.0M577K1.9M
MPWR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MPWR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: NVTS as "Hold", WOLF as "Hold", AEHR as "Hold", MPWR as "Buy", ALGM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 2.5% upside for MPWR (target: $1615) vs -66.3% for NVTS (target: $5). MPWR is the only dividend payer here at 0.37% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricNVTS logoNVTSNavitas Semicondu…WOLF logoWOLFWolfspeed, Inc.AEHR logoAEHRAehr Test SystemsMPWR logoMPWRMonolithic Power …ALGM logoALGMAllegro MicroSyst…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$5.32$20.00$62.00$1615.00$44.83
# AnalystsCovering analysts81932513
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises81
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.90
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.0%+0.0%+9.6%
MPWR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

MPWR leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AEHR leads in 1 (Total Returns).

Best OverallMonolithic Power Systems, I… (MPWR)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NVTS vs WOLF vs AEHR vs MPWR vs ALGM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NVTS or WOLF or AEHR or MPWR or ALGM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

(MPWR) is the stronger pick with 26. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -44. 9% for Navitas Semiconductor Corporation (NVTS). Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) offers the better valuation at 123. 6x trailing P/E (73. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NVTS or WOLF or AEHR or MPWR or ALGM?

On forward P/E, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 73. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NVTS or WOLF or AEHR or MPWR or ALGM?

Over the past 5 years, Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) delivered a total return of +38.

9%, compared to -52. 9% for Wolfspeed, Inc. (WOLF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEHR returned +70. 3% versus NVTS's +45. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NVTS or WOLF or AEHR or MPWR or ALGM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

(MPWR) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 28β versus Aehr Test Systems's 4. 77β — meaning AEHR is approximately 110% more volatile than MPWR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 40% for Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NVTS or WOLF or AEHR or MPWR or ALGM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

(MPWR) is pulling ahead at 26. 4% versus -44. 9% for Navitas Semiconductor Corporation (NVTS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aehr Test Systems grew EPS 0. 0% year-over-year, compared to -150. 0% for Allegro MicroSystems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MPWR leads at 15. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NVTS or WOLF or AEHR or MPWR or ALGM?

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

(MPWR) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 1% net margin versus -254. 7% for Navitas Semiconductor Corporation — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MPWR leads at 26. 1% versus -190. 0% for NVTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MPWR leads at 55. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NVTS or WOLF or AEHR or MPWR or ALGM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

(MPWR) trades at 73. 1x forward P/E versus 90. 2x for Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. — 17. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MPWR: 2. 5% to $1615. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NVTS or WOLF or AEHR or MPWR or ALGM?

In this comparison, MPWR (0.

4% yield) pays a dividend. NVTS, WOLF, AEHR, ALGM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is NVTS or WOLF or AEHR or MPWR or ALGM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Allegro MicroSystems, Inc.

(ALGM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+170. 8% 10Y return). Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALGM: +170. 8%, MPWR: +24. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NVTS and WOLF and AEHR and MPWR and ALGM?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: NVTS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WOLF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AEHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MPWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ALGM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

NVTS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WOLF

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AEHR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MPWR

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ALGM

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Gross Margin > 26%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform NVTS and WOLF and AEHR and MPWR and ALGM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(NVTS: -38.7% · WOLF: -19.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.