Household & Personal Products
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NWL vs ENR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
NWL vs ENR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Household & Personal Products | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $1.89B | $1.27B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.19B | $2.98B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-281M | $195M |
| Gross Margin | 34.0% | 40.9% |
| Operating Margin | 6.4% | 15.8% |
| Forward P/E | 7.9x | 5.6x |
| Total Debt | $5.65B | $3.53B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $203M | $236M |
NWL vs ENR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Newell Brands Inc. (NWL) | 100 | 33.8 | -66.2% |
| Energizer Holdings,… (ENR) | 100 | 42.3 | -57.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NWL vs ENR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NWL is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- -5.4% vs ENR's -9.9%
ENR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.24, yield 6.5%
- Rev growth 2.3%, EPS growth 5.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.1%
- -31.3% 10Y total return vs NWL's -75.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.3% revenue growth vs NWL's -5.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.6x vs 7.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.5% margin vs NWL's -3.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.24 vs NWL's 1.91 | |
| Dividends | 6.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs NWL's 6.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -5.4% vs ENR's -9.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.4% ROA vs NWL's -2.5%, ROIC 11.8% vs 4.3% |
NWL vs ENR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NWL vs ENR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ENR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NWL is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.2B annually — 2.4x ENR's $3.0B. ENR is the more profitable business, keeping 6.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NWL's -3.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.2B | $3.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $696M | $566M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$281M | $195M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $19M | $159M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.0% | +40.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +15.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.9% | +6.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.3% | +5.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.1% | -3.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.9% | -61.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NWL and ENR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ENR's 7.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NWL's 9.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.9B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.3B | $4.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.54x | 5.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.93x | 5.57x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.15x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.68x | 6.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.26x | 0.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.78x | 7.86x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 111.23x | 20.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ENR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ENR delivers a 116.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $117 in annual profit, vs $-11 for NWL. NWL carries lower financial leverage with a 2.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ENR's 20.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ENR scores 6/9 vs NWL's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.1% | +116.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.5% | +4.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.3% | +11.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +14.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.36x | 20.79x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.4B | $3.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $203M | $236M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.7B | $3.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.01x | 2.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ENR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ENR five years ago would be worth $4,857 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,453 for NWL. Over the past 12 months, NWL leads with a -5.4% total return vs ENR's -9.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ENR at -13.9% vs NWL's -19.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.5% | -5.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -5.4% | -9.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.8% | -36.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.5% | -51.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.8% | -31.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -19.5% | -13.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NWL and ENR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ENR is the less volatile stock with a 1.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NWL's 1.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NWL currently trades 67.0% from its 52-week high vs ENR's 61.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.91x | 1.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.64 | $30.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.07 | $16.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.0% | +61.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.6 | 49.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.9M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
ENR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NWL as "Hold" and ENR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 25.1% upside for ENR (target: $23) vs 23.6% for NWL (target: $6). For income investors, ENR offers the higher dividend yield at 6.52% vs NWL's 6.45%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.50 | $23.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.4% | +6.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.29 | $1.21 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +7.1% |
ENR leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
NWL vs ENR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NWL or ENR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Energizer Holdings, Inc.
(ENR) is the stronger pick with 2. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 0% for Newell Brands Inc. (NWL). Energizer Holdings, Inc. (ENR) offers the better valuation at 5. 6x trailing P/E (5. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Newell Brands Inc. (NWL) a "Hold" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NWL or ENR?
On forward P/E, Energizer Holdings, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 5. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NWL or ENR?
Over the past 5 years, Energizer Holdings, Inc.
(ENR) delivered a total return of -51. 4%, compared to -75. 5% for Newell Brands Inc. (NWL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENR returned -31. 3% versus NWL's -75. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NWL or ENR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Energizer Holdings, Inc.
(ENR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 24β versus Newell Brands Inc. 's 1. 91β — meaning NWL is approximately 54% more volatile than ENR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Newell Brands Inc. (NWL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 21% for Energizer Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NWL or ENR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Energizer Holdings, Inc.
(ENR) is pulling ahead at 2. 3% versus -5. 0% for Newell Brands Inc. (NWL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Energizer Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 538. 5% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for Newell Brands Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ENR leads at -1. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NWL or ENR?
Energizer Holdings, Inc.
(ENR) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 1% net margin versus -4. 0% for Newell Brands Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ENR leads at 17. 8% versus 6. 2% for NWL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ENR leads at 40. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NWL or ENR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Energizer Holdings, Inc.
(ENR) trades at 5. 6x forward P/E versus 7. 9x for Newell Brands Inc. — 2. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ENR: 25. 1% to $23. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — NWL or ENR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Energizer Holdings, Inc. (ENR) offers the highest yield at 6. 5%, versus 6. 4% for Newell Brands Inc. (NWL).
09Is NWL or ENR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Energizer Holdings, Inc.
(ENR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 24), 6. 5% yield). Newell Brands Inc. (NWL) carries a higher beta of 1. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ENR: -31. 3%, NWL: -75. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NWL and ENR?
These companies operate in different sectors (NWL (Consumer Defensive) and ENR (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NWL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ENR is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.