Entertainment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NWSA vs LEE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Publishing
NWSA vs LEE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Publishing |
| Market Cap | $15.27B | $49M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.03B | $548M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.69B | $-26M |
| Gross Margin | 34.9% | 57.3% |
| Operating Margin | 7.8% | 2.7% |
| Forward P/E | 25.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $2.94B | $482M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.40B | $10M |
NWSA vs LEE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| News Corporation (NWSA) | 100 | 220.7 | +120.7% |
| Lee Enterprises, In… (LEE) | 100 | 72.1 | -27.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NWSA vs LEE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NWSA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 1.2%
- Rev growth 2.4%, EPS growth 350.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.6%
- 136.5% 10Y total return vs LEE's -60.4%
LEE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, current ratio 0.79x
- Beta 0.54, current ratio 0.79x
- Beta 0.54 vs NWSA's 0.60
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.4% revenue growth vs LEE's -8.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.7% margin vs LEE's -4.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs NWSA's 0.60 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -1.4% vs NWSA's -3.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.9% ROA vs LEE's -4.3%, ROIC 6.8% vs 3.3% |
NWSA vs LEE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NWSA vs LEE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NWSA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NWSA is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.0B annually — 16.5x LEE's $548M. NWSA is the more profitable business, keeping 18.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LEE's -4.8%. On growth, NWSA holds the edge at +8.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9.0B | $548M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $469M | $31M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.7B | -$26M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $572M | $6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.9% | +57.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.8% | +2.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.7% | -4.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.3% | +1.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.9% | -10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.1% | +67.1% |
Valuation Metrics
LEE leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, NWSA's 11.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LEE's 13.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $15.3B | $49M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15.8B | $520M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.06x | -1.30x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.75x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.17x | 13.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.81x | 0.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.64x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.00x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NWSA leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NWSA scores 7/9 vs LEE's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.1% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.9% | -4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | +3.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.2% | +3.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.31x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $537M | $472M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.4B | $10M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.9B | $482M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 127.43x | 0.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NWSA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NWSA five years ago would be worth $10,219 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,567 for LEE. Over the past 12 months, LEE leads with a -1.4% total return vs NWSA's -3.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NWSA at 17.3% vs LEE's -9.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.6% | +74.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.3% | -1.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.3% | -26.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.2% | -74.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +136.5% | -60.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.3% | -9.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NWSA and LEE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LEE is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NWSA's 0.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NWSA currently trades 85.5% from its 52-week high vs LEE's 80.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 0.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.61 | $9.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.20 | $3.34 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.5% | +80.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.3 | 45.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.1M | 70K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
NWSA is the only dividend payer here at 1.20% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $32.40 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.32 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | 0.0% |
NWSA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LEE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
NWSA vs LEE: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NWSA or LEE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, News Corporation (NWSA) is the stronger pick with 2.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 0% for Lee Enterprises, Incorporated (LEE). News Corporation (NWSA) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E (25. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate News Corporation (NWSA) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NWSA or LEE?
Over the past 5 years, News Corporation (NWSA) delivered a total return of +2.
2%, compared to -74. 3% for Lee Enterprises, Incorporated (LEE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NWSA returned +136. 5% versus LEE's -60. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NWSA or LEE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lee Enterprises, Incorporated (LEE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
54β versus News Corporation's 0. 60β — meaning NWSA is approximately 10% more volatile than LEE relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — NWSA or LEE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), News Corporation (NWSA) is pulling ahead at 2.
4% versus -8. 0% for Lee Enterprises, Incorporated (LEE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: News Corporation grew EPS 350. 0% year-over-year, compared to -41. 4% for Lee Enterprises, Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, NWSA leads at -6. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NWSA or LEE?
News Corporation (NWSA) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
0% net margin versus -6. 7% for Lee Enterprises, Incorporated — meaning it keeps 14. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NWSA leads at 11. 3% versus 3. 5% for LEE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NWSA leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — NWSA or LEE?
In this comparison, NWSA (1.
2% yield) pays a dividend. LEE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is NWSA or LEE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, News Corporation (NWSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
60), 1. 2% yield, +136. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NWSA: +136. 5%, LEE: -60. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between NWSA and LEE?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NWSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; LEE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. NWSA pays a dividend while LEE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.