Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NWSA vs LEE vs NYT vs GCI vs IAC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NWSA
News Corporation

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$15.27B
5Y Perf.+120.7%
LEE
Lee Enterprises, Incorporated

Publishing

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$49M
5Y Perf.-27.9%
NYT
The New York Times Company

Publishing

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.98B
5Y Perf.+104.4%
GCI
Gannett Co., Inc.

Publishing

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$877M
5Y Perf.+293.1%
IAC
IAC InterActive Corp.

Internet Content & Information

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.21B
5Y Perf.-10.7%

NWSA vs LEE vs NYT vs GCI vs IAC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NWSA logoNWSA
LEE logoLEE
NYT logoNYT
GCI logoGCI
IAC logoIAC
IndustryEntertainmentPublishingPublishingPublishingInternet Content & Information
Market Cap$15.27B$49M$12.98B$877M$3.21B
Revenue (TTM)$9.03B$548M$2.90B$2.34B$2.25B
Net Income (TTM)$1.69B$-26M$382M$96M$41M
Gross Margin34.9%57.3%51.4%36.4%64.6%
Operating Margin7.8%2.7%16.1%2.0%1.5%
Forward P/E25.8x29.4x51.0x109.7x
Total Debt$2.94B$482M$49M$1.29B$1.43B
Cash & Equiv.$2.40B$10M$255M$106M$960M

NWSA vs LEE vs NYT vs GCI vs IACLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NWSA
LEE
NYT
GCI
IAC
StockMay 20May 26Return
News Corporation (NWSA)100220.7+120.7%
Lee Enterprises, In… (LEE)10072.1-27.9%
The New York Times … (NYT)100204.4+104.4%
Gannett Co., Inc. (GCI)100393.1+293.1%
IAC InterActive Cor… (IAC)10089.3-10.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NWSA vs LEE vs NYT vs GCI vs IAC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NWSA and NYT are tied at the top with 3 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. The New York Times Company is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. GCI also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
NWSA
News Corporation
The Income Pick

NWSA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 1.2%
  • Beta 0.60, yield 1.2%, current ratio 1.84x
  • Lower P/E (25.8x vs 109.7x)
  • 18.7% margin vs LEE's -4.8%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
LEE
Lee Enterprises, Incorporated
The Lower-Volatility Pick

LEE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: communication services exposure
NYT
The New York Times Company
The Growth Play

NYT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 9.2%, EPS growth 18.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.0%
  • 5.8% 10Y total return vs IAC's 347.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 2.4%, current ratio 1.54x
  • 9.2% revenue growth vs IAC's -37.1%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
GCI
Gannett Co., Inc.
The Momentum Pick

GCI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +80.1% vs NWSA's -3.3%
Best for: momentum
IAC
IAC InterActive Corp.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, IAC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNYT logoNYT9.2% revenue growth vs IAC's -37.1%
ValueNWSA logoNWSALower P/E (25.8x vs 109.7x)
Quality / MarginsNWSA logoNWSA18.7% margin vs LEE's -4.8%
Stability / SafetyNYT logoNYTBeta 0.28 vs IAC's 1.10, lower leverage
DividendsNWSA logoNWSA1.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NYT's 0.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)GCI logoGCI+80.1% vs NWSA's -3.3%
Efficiency (ROA)NYT logoNYT13.2% ROA vs LEE's -4.3%, ROIC 18.7% vs 3.3%

NWSA vs LEE vs NYT vs GCI vs IAC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NWSANews Corporation
FY 2025
Dow Jones Segment
27.6%$2.3B
News And Information Services Segment
25.7%$2.2B
Book Publishing Segment
25.4%$2.1B
Digital Real Estate Services Segment
21.3%$1.8B
LEELee Enterprises, Incorporated
FY 2025
Subscription and Circulation
46.0%$258M
Advertising and Marketing Services
45.0%$253M
Product and Service, Other
9.1%$51M
NYTThe New York Times Company
FY 2025
Subscription
76.7%$2.0B
Advertising
22.3%$566M
Building Real Estate
1.1%$27M
GCIGannett Co., Inc.
FY 2024
Digital
34.6%$1.1B
Print Circulation
20.4%$650M
Print Advertising
16.5%$526M
Digital Marketing Services
14.9%$476M
Digital Advertising
10.8%$346M
Digital Other
2.9%$92M
IACIAC InterActive Corp.
FY 2025
People Inc.
73.6%$1.8B
Care.com
14.5%$347M
Search
8.9%$213M
Emerging & Other
3.0%$71M
Intersegment Eliminations
-0.0%$-145,000

NWSA vs LEE vs NYT vs GCI vs IAC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNYTLAGGINGIAC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NYT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

NWSA is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.0B annually — 16.5x LEE's $548M. NWSA is the more profitable business, keeping 18.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LEE's -4.8%. On growth, NYT holds the edge at +12.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNWSA logoNWSANews CorporationLEE logoLEELee Enterprises, …NYT logoNYTThe New York Time…GCI logoGCIGannett Co., Inc.IAC logoIACIAC InterActive C…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$9.0B$548M$2.9B$2.3B$2.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$469M$31M$554M$214M$129M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1.7B-$26M$382M$96M$41M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$572M$6M$542M$28M$60M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+34.9%+57.3%+51.4%+36.4%+64.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+7.8%+2.7%+16.1%+2.0%+1.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+18.7%-4.8%+13.2%+4.1%+1.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+6.3%+1.0%+18.7%+1.2%+2.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+8.9%-10.0%+12.0%-8.4%-25.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.1%+67.1%+80.0%-92.9%+64.8%
NYT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — NWSA and GCI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 13.1x trailing earnings, NWSA trades at a 66% valuation discount to NYT's 38.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NWSA's 11.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NYT's 23.9x.

MetricNWSA logoNWSANews CorporationLEE logoLEELee Enterprises, …NYT logoNYTThe New York Time…GCI logoGCIGannett Co., Inc.IAC logoIACIAC InterActive C…
Market CapShares × price$15.3B$49M$13.0B$877M$3.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$15.8B$520M$12.8B$2.1B$3.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS13.06x-1.30x38.37x-33.11x-32.42x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.25.75x29.43x51.03x109.69x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.35x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.17x13.44x23.85x18.14x14.30x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.81x0.09x4.60x0.35x1.34x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.64x6.48x5.56x0.70x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF21.00x23.59x17.27x71.54x
Evenly matched — NWSA and GCI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NYT leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

GCI delivers a 49.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $50 in annual profit, vs $1 for IAC. NYT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GCI's 8.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NYT scores 8/9 vs LEE's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricNWSA logoNWSANews CorporationLEE logoLEELee Enterprises, …NYT logoNYTThe New York Time…GCI logoGCIGannett Co., Inc.IAC logoIACIAC InterActive C…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+18.1%+19.2%+49.7%+0.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+10.9%-4.3%+13.2%+5.0%+0.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.8%+3.3%+18.7%-2.3%-1.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.2%+3.9%+19.8%-2.7%-1.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–971845
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.31x0.02x8.43x0.30x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$537M$472M-$207M$1.2B$466M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2.4B$10M$255M$106M$960M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2.9B$482M$49M$1.3B$1.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense127.43x0.16x397.81x0.91x4.84x
NYT leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

GCI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NYT five years ago would be worth $18,322 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,567 for LEE. Over the past 12 months, GCI leads with a +80.1% total return vs NWSA's -3.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GCI at 44.6% vs LEE's -9.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNWSA logoNWSANews CorporationLEE logoLEELee Enterprises, …NYT logoNYTThe New York Time…GCI logoGCIGannett Co., Inc.IAC logoIACIAC InterActive C…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+3.6%+74.3%+15.4%+14.4%+10.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-3.3%-1.4%+53.8%+80.1%+22.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+61.3%-26.5%+105.5%+202.5%-2.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+2.2%-74.3%+83.2%+33.6%-67.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+136.5%-60.4%+576.0%-28.9%+347.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+17.3%-9.7%+27.1%+44.6%-1.0%
GCI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NYT and GCI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NYT is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IAC's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GCI currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs LEE's 80.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNWSA logoNWSANews CorporationLEE logoLEELee Enterprises, …NYT logoNYTThe New York Time…GCI logoGCIGannett Co., Inc.IAC logoIACIAC InterActive C…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.60x0.54x0.28x0.79x1.10x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$31.61$9.97$87.10$6.17$45.78
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$22.20$3.34$51.03$3.15$29.56
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+85.5%+80.2%+92.1%+96.7%+94.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10058.345.460.171.148.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded4.1M70K2.1M1.5M1.1M
Evenly matched — NYT and GCI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — NWSA and NYT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: NWSA as "Buy", NYT as "Hold", GCI as "Hold", IAC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 19.8% upside for NWSA (target: $32) vs -16.4% for NYT (target: $67). For income investors, NWSA offers the higher dividend yield at 1.20% vs NYT's 0.83%.

MetricNWSA logoNWSANews CorporationLEE logoLEELee Enterprises, …NYT logoNYTThe New York Time…GCI logoGCIGannett Co., Inc.IAC logoIACIAC InterActive C…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$32.40$67.00$5.55$49.17
# AnalystsCovering analysts28161633
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.2%+0.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1170
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.32$0.67
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.0%0.0%+1.3%+0.4%+9.8%
Evenly matched — NWSA and NYT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NYT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GCI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.

Best OverallThe New York Times Company (NYT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NWSA vs LEE vs NYT vs GCI vs IAC: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NWSA or LEE or NYT or GCI or IAC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, The New York Times Company (NYT) is the stronger pick with 9.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). News Corporation (NWSA) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E (25. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate News Corporation (NWSA) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NWSA or LEE or NYT or GCI or IAC?

On trailing P/E, News Corporation (NWSA) is the cheapest at 13.

1x versus The New York Times Company at 38. 4x. On forward P/E, News Corporation is actually cheaper at 25. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NWSA or LEE or NYT or GCI or IAC?

Over the past 5 years, The New York Times Company (NYT) delivered a total return of +83.

2%, compared to -74. 3% for Lee Enterprises, Incorporated (LEE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NYT returned +576. 0% versus LEE's -60. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NWSA or LEE or NYT or GCI or IAC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The New York Times Company (NYT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

28β versus IAC InterActive Corp. 's 1. 10β — meaning IAC is approximately 296% more volatile than NYT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The New York Times Company (NYT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 8% for Gannett Co. , Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NWSA or LEE or NYT or GCI or IAC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The New York Times Company (NYT) is pulling ahead at 9.

2% versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: News Corporation grew EPS 350. 0% year-over-year, compared to -41. 4% for Lee Enterprises, Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, NYT leads at 7. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NWSA or LEE or NYT or GCI or IAC?

News Corporation (NWSA) is the more profitable company, earning 14.

0% net margin versus -6. 7% for Lee Enterprises, Incorporated — meaning it keeps 14. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NYT leads at 16. 0% versus -4. 1% for IAC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NWSA leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NWSA or LEE or NYT or GCI or IAC more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, News Corporation (NWSA) trades at 25.

8x forward P/E versus 109. 7x for IAC InterActive Corp. — 83. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NWSA: 19. 8% to $32. 40.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NWSA or LEE or NYT or GCI or IAC?

In this comparison, NWSA (1.

2% yield), NYT (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. LEE, GCI, IAC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is NWSA or LEE or NYT or GCI or IAC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The New York Times Company (NYT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

28), 0. 8% yield, +576. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NYT: +576. 0%, IAC: +347. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NWSA and LEE and NYT and GCI and IAC?

These companies operate in different sectors (NWSA (Communication Services) and LEE (Communication Services) and NYT (Communication Services) and GCI (Communication Services) and IAC (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: NWSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; LEE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NYT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GCI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. NWSA, NYT pay a dividend while LEE, GCI, IAC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

NWSA

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LEE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 34%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NYT

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GCI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IAC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform NWSA and LEE and NYT and GCI and IAC on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(NWSA: 8.9% · LEE: -10.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.