Entertainment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NWSA vs NYT vs GCI vs LEE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Publishing
Publishing
Publishing
NWSA vs NYT vs GCI vs LEE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Publishing | Publishing | Publishing |
| Market Cap | $14.50B | $12.48B | $877M | $51M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.85B | $2.75B | $2.34B | $548M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.08B | $338M | $96M | $-26M |
| Gross Margin | 85.5% | 51.6% | 36.4% | 57.3% |
| Operating Margin | 12.1% | 15.2% | 2.0% | 2.7% |
| Forward P/E | 24.2x | 28.4x | 51.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $2.94B | $48M | $1.29B | $482M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.40B | $199M | $106M | $10M |
NWSA vs NYT vs GCI vs LEE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| News Corporation (NWSA) | 100 | 207.7 | +107.7% |
| The New York Times … (NYT) | 100 | 196.9 | +96.9% |
| Gannett Co., Inc. (GCI) | 100 | 393.1 | +293.1% |
| Lee Enterprises, In… (LEE) | 100 | 73.6 | -26.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NWSA vs NYT vs GCI vs LEE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NWSA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 0.60, yield 1.3%, current ratio 1.84x
- Better valuation composite
- 1.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NYT's 0.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
NYT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.28, yield 0.6%
- Rev growth 6.6%, EPS growth 26.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.6%
- 5.6% 10Y total return vs NWSA's 125.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 2.5%, current ratio 1.53x
GCI is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +84.5% vs NWSA's -7.5%
LEE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.6% revenue growth vs LEE's -8.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.3% margin vs LEE's -4.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs GCI's 0.79, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NYT's 0.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +84.5% vs NWSA's -7.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.7% ROA vs LEE's -6.0%, ROIC 16.0% vs 3.3% |
NWSA vs NYT vs GCI vs LEE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NWSA vs NYT vs GCI vs LEE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NYT leads in 2 of 6 categories
NWSA leads 1 • GCI leads 1 • LEE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NYT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NWSA is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.9B annually — 16.2x LEE's $548M. NYT is the more profitable business, keeping 12.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LEE's -4.8%. On growth, NWSA holds the edge at +15.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.9B | $2.7B | $2.3B | $548M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.6B | $509M | $214M | $31M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $338M | $96M | -$26M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $652M | $537M | $28M | $6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +85.5% | +51.6% | +36.4% | +57.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | +15.2% | +2.0% | +2.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +12.3% | +4.1% | -4.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +19.5% | +1.2% | +1.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.7% | +9.5% | -8.4% | -10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.7% | +28.2% | -92.9% | +67.1% |
Valuation Metrics
NWSA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.3x trailing earnings, NWSA trades at a 72% valuation discount to NYT's 43.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NWSA's 10.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NYT's 27.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14.5B | $12.5B | $877M | $51M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15.0B | $12.3B | $2.1B | $523M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.29x | 43.65x | -33.11x | -1.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.23x | 28.35x | 51.03x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.72x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.63x | 27.83x | 18.14x | 13.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.72x | 4.83x | 0.35x | 0.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.54x | 6.65x | 5.56x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.94x | 32.73x | 17.27x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NYT leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GCI delivers a 49.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $50 in annual profit, vs $11 for NWSA. NYT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GCI's 8.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NWSA scores 7/9 vs LEE's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.4% | +17.1% | +49.7% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.0% | +11.7% | +5.0% | -6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | +16.0% | -2.3% | +3.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.2% | +16.2% | -2.7% | +3.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.31x | 0.02x | 8.43x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $537M | -$152M | $1.2B | $472M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.4B | $199M | $106M | $10M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.9B | $48M | $1.3B | $482M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 39.56x | 370.76x | 0.91x | 0.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GCI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NYT five years ago would be worth $18,471 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,261 for LEE. Over the past 12 months, GCI leads with a +84.5% total return vs NWSA's -7.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GCI at 43.7% vs LEE's -9.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.5% | +11.2% | +14.4% | +78.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.5% | +49.3% | +84.5% | -5.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.1% | +97.8% | +196.5% | -24.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.2% | +84.7% | +33.9% | -77.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +125.5% | +557.1% | -29.6% | -59.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.0% | +25.5% | +43.7% | -9.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NYT and GCI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NYT is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GCI's 0.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GCI currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs NWSA's 80.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 0.28x | 0.79x | 0.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.61 | $87.10 | $6.17 | $9.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.20 | $51.03 | $3.08 | $3.34 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.5% | +88.7% | +96.7% | +81.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.0 | 41.7 | 71.1 | 47.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.0M | 2.1M | 1.5M | 70K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NWSA and NYT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NWSA as "Buy", NYT as "Hold", GCI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 27.4% upside for NWSA (target: $32) vs -13.3% for NYT (target: $67). For income investors, NWSA offers the higher dividend yield at 1.28% vs NYT's 0.65%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $32.40 | $67.00 | $5.55 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 16 | 16 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.3% | +0.6% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 6 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.32 | $0.50 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +0.7% | +0.4% | 0.0% |
NYT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NWSA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
NWSA vs NYT vs GCI vs LEE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NWSA or NYT or GCI or LEE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The New York Times Company (NYT) is the stronger pick with 6.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 0% for Lee Enterprises, Incorporated (LEE). News Corporation (NWSA) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E (24. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate News Corporation (NWSA) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NWSA or NYT or GCI or LEE?
On trailing P/E, News Corporation (NWSA) is the cheapest at 12.
3x versus The New York Times Company at 43. 6x. On forward P/E, News Corporation is actually cheaper at 24. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NWSA or NYT or GCI or LEE?
Over the past 5 years, The New York Times Company (NYT) delivered a total return of +84.
7%, compared to -77. 4% for Lee Enterprises, Incorporated (LEE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NYT returned +557. 1% versus LEE's -59. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NWSA or NYT or GCI or LEE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The New York Times Company (NYT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
28β versus Gannett Co. , Inc. 's 0. 79β — meaning GCI is approximately 184% more volatile than NYT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The New York Times Company (NYT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 8% for Gannett Co. , Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NWSA or NYT or GCI or LEE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The New York Times Company (NYT) is pulling ahead at 6.
6% versus -8. 0% for Lee Enterprises, Incorporated (LEE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: News Corporation grew EPS 350. 0% year-over-year, compared to -41. 4% for Lee Enterprises, Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, NYT leads at 7. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NWSA or NYT or GCI or LEE?
News Corporation (NWSA) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
0% net margin versus -6. 7% for Lee Enterprises, Incorporated — meaning it keeps 14. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NYT leads at 13. 6% versus -1. 7% for GCI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NWSA leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NWSA or NYT or GCI or LEE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, News Corporation (NWSA) trades at 24.
2x forward P/E versus 51. 0x for Gannett Co. , Inc. — 26. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NWSA: 27. 4% to $32. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — NWSA or NYT or GCI or LEE?
In this comparison, NWSA (1.
3% yield), NYT (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. GCI, LEE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NWSA or NYT or GCI or LEE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The New York Times Company (NYT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
28), 0. 6% yield, +557. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NYT: +557. 1%, GCI: -29. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NWSA and NYT and GCI and LEE?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NWSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; NYT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GCI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LEE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. NWSA, NYT pay a dividend while GCI, LEE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.