Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NWSA vs NYT vs GCI vs THS vs LEE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NWSA
News Corporation

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$14.50B
5Y Perf.+107.7%
NYT
The New York Times Company

Publishing

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.48B
5Y Perf.+96.9%
GCI
Gannett Co., Inc.

Publishing

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$877M
5Y Perf.+293.1%
THS
TreeHouse Foods, Inc.

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.46B
5Y Perf.-53.3%
LEE
Lee Enterprises, Incorporated

Publishing

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$51M
5Y Perf.-26.4%

NWSA vs NYT vs GCI vs THS vs LEE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NWSA logoNWSA
NYT logoNYT
GCI logoGCI
THS logoTHS
LEE logoLEE
IndustryEntertainmentPublishingPublishingPackaged FoodsPublishing
Market Cap$14.50B$12.48B$877M$1.46B$51M
Revenue (TTM)$8.85B$2.75B$2.34B$3.34B$548M
Net Income (TTM)$1.08B$338M$96M$-242M$-26M
Gross Margin85.5%51.6%36.4%17.7%57.3%
Operating Margin12.1%15.2%2.0%-4.6%2.7%
Forward P/E24.2x28.4x51.0x12.8x
Total Debt$2.94B$48M$1.29B$1.57B$482M
Cash & Equiv.$2.40B$199M$106M$290M$10M

NWSA vs NYT vs GCI vs THS vs LEELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NWSA
NYT
GCI
THS
LEE
StockMay 20May 26Return
News Corporation (NWSA)100207.7+107.7%
The New York Times … (NYT)100196.9+96.9%
Gannett Co., Inc. (GCI)100393.1+293.1%
TreeHouse Foods, In… (THS)10046.7-53.3%
Lee Enterprises, In… (LEE)10073.6-26.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NWSA vs NYT vs GCI vs THS vs LEE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NYT leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. News Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns. GCI and THS also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
NWSA
News Corporation
The Income Pick

NWSA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 1.3%
  • Beta 0.60, yield 1.3%, current ratio 1.84x
  • 1.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NYT's 0.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
NYT
The New York Times Company
The Growth Play

NYT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 6.6%, EPS growth 26.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.6%
  • 5.6% 10Y total return vs NWSA's 125.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 2.5%, current ratio 1.53x
  • 6.6% revenue growth vs LEE's -8.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
GCI
Gannett Co., Inc.
The Momentum Pick

GCI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +84.5% vs NWSA's -7.5%
Best for: momentum
THS
TreeHouse Foods, Inc.
The Value Play

THS is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Better valuation composite
Best for: value
LEE
Lee Enterprises, Incorporated
The Lower-Volatility Pick

Among these 5 stocks, LEE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: communication services exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNYT logoNYT6.6% revenue growth vs LEE's -8.0%
ValueTHS logoTHSBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsNYT logoNYT12.3% margin vs THS's -7.2%
Stability / SafetyNYT logoNYTBeta 0.28 vs THS's 1.18, lower leverage
DividendsNWSA logoNWSA1.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NYT's 0.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)GCI logoGCI+84.5% vs NWSA's -7.5%
Efficiency (ROA)NYT logoNYT11.7% ROA vs THS's -6.4%, ROIC 16.0% vs 2.7%

NWSA vs NYT vs GCI vs THS vs LEE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NWSANews Corporation
FY 2025
Dow Jones Segment
27.6%$2.3B
News And Information Services Segment
25.7%$2.2B
Book Publishing Segment
25.4%$2.1B
Digital Real Estate Services Segment
21.3%$1.8B
NYTThe New York Times Company
FY 2024
Subscription
68.4%$1.8B
Advertising
19.4%$506M
Other Products and Services
11.2%$291M
Building Real Estate
1.0%$27M
GCIGannett Co., Inc.
FY 2024
Digital
34.6%$1.1B
Print Circulation
20.4%$650M
Print Advertising
16.5%$526M
Digital Marketing Services
14.9%$476M
Digital Advertising
10.8%$346M
Digital Other
2.9%$92M
THSTreeHouse Foods, Inc.
FY 2024
Snacking
100.0%$1.3B
LEELee Enterprises, Incorporated
FY 2025
Subscription and Circulation
46.0%$258M
Advertising and Marketing Services
45.0%$253M
Product and Service, Other
9.1%$51M

NWSA vs NYT vs GCI vs THS vs LEE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNYTLAGGINGLEE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NYT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

NWSA is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.9B annually — 16.2x LEE's $548M. NYT is the more profitable business, keeping 12.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to THS's -7.2%. On growth, NWSA holds the edge at +15.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNWSA logoNWSANews CorporationNYT logoNYTThe New York Time…GCI logoGCIGannett Co., Inc.THS logoTHSTreeHouse Foods, …LEE logoLEELee Enterprises, …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$8.9B$2.7B$2.3B$3.3B$548M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1.6B$509M$214M$11M$31M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1.1B$338M$96M-$242M-$26M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$652M$537M$28M$101M$6M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+85.5%+51.6%+36.4%+17.7%+57.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+12.1%+15.2%+2.0%-4.6%+2.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+12.2%+12.3%+4.1%-7.2%-4.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+7.4%+19.5%+1.2%+3.0%+1.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+15.7%+9.5%-8.4%+0.1%-10.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-44.7%+28.2%-92.9%-74.1%+67.1%
NYT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

THS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 12.3x trailing earnings, NWSA trades at a 74% valuation discount to THS's 47.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NWSA's 10.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NYT's 27.8x.

MetricNWSA logoNWSANews CorporationNYT logoNYTThe New York Time…GCI logoGCIGannett Co., Inc.THS logoTHSTreeHouse Foods, …LEE logoLEELee Enterprises, …
Market CapShares × price$14.5B$12.5B$877M$1.5B$51M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$15.0B$12.3B$2.1B$2.7B$523M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.29x43.65x-33.11x47.90x-1.33x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.24.23x28.35x51.03x12.84x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.72x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.63x27.83x18.14x10.95x13.50x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.72x4.83x0.35x0.44x0.09x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.54x6.65x5.56x0.83x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF19.94x32.73x17.27x11.59x
THS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NYT leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

GCI delivers a 49.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $50 in annual profit, vs $-19 for THS. NYT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GCI's 8.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NWSA scores 7/9 vs LEE's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricNWSA logoNWSANews CorporationNYT logoNYTThe New York Time…GCI logoGCIGannett Co., Inc.THS logoTHSTreeHouse Foods, …LEE logoLEELee Enterprises, …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.4%+17.1%+49.7%-19.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+7.0%+11.7%+5.0%-6.4%-6.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.8%+16.0%-2.3%+2.7%+3.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.2%+16.2%-2.7%+3.1%+3.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–977451
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.31x0.02x8.43x1.01x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$537M-$152M$1.2B$1.3B$472M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2.4B$199M$106M$290M$10M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2.9B$48M$1.3B$1.6B$482M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense39.56x370.76x0.91x-1.98x0.16x
NYT leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

GCI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NYT five years ago would be worth $18,471 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,261 for LEE. Over the past 12 months, GCI leads with a +84.5% total return vs NWSA's -7.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GCI at 43.7% vs THS's -23.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNWSA logoNWSANews CorporationNYT logoNYTThe New York Time…GCI logoGCIGannett Co., Inc.THS logoTHSTreeHouse Foods, …LEE logoLEELee Enterprises, …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-2.5%+11.2%+14.4%+4.0%+78.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-7.5%+49.3%+84.5%+4.2%-5.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+52.1%+97.8%+196.5%-55.0%-24.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1.2%+84.7%+33.9%-49.4%-77.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+125.5%+557.1%-29.6%-73.0%-59.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+15.0%+25.5%+43.7%-23.4%-9.0%
GCI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NYT and THS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NYT is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than THS's 1.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. THS currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs NWSA's 80.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNWSA logoNWSANews CorporationNYT logoNYTThe New York Time…GCI logoGCIGannett Co., Inc.THS logoTHSTreeHouse Foods, …LEE logoLEELee Enterprises, …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.60x0.28x0.79x1.18x0.54x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$31.61$87.10$6.17$24.85$9.97
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$22.20$51.03$3.08$15.85$3.34
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+80.5%+88.7%+96.7%+98.3%+81.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.041.771.157.047.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded4.0M2.1M1.5M28.9M70K
Evenly matched — NYT and THS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — NWSA and NYT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: NWSA as "Buy", NYT as "Hold", GCI as "Hold", THS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 27.4% upside for NWSA (target: $32) vs -13.3% for NYT (target: $67). For income investors, NWSA offers the higher dividend yield at 1.28% vs NYT's 0.65%.

MetricNWSA logoNWSANews CorporationNYT logoNYTThe New York Time…GCI logoGCIGannett Co., Inc.THS logoTHSTreeHouse Foods, …LEE logoLEELee Enterprises, …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$32.40$67.00$5.55$23.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts28161626
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.3%+0.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1601
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.32$0.50
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.0%+0.7%+0.4%+10.2%0.0%
Evenly matched — NWSA and NYT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NYT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). THS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallThe New York Times Company (NYT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NWSA vs NYT vs GCI vs THS vs LEE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NWSA or NYT or GCI or THS or LEE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, The New York Times Company (NYT) is the stronger pick with 6.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 0% for Lee Enterprises, Incorporated (LEE). News Corporation (NWSA) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E (24. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate News Corporation (NWSA) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NWSA or NYT or GCI or THS or LEE?

On trailing P/E, News Corporation (NWSA) is the cheapest at 12.

3x versus TreeHouse Foods, Inc. at 47. 9x. On forward P/E, TreeHouse Foods, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NWSA or NYT or GCI or THS or LEE?

Over the past 5 years, The New York Times Company (NYT) delivered a total return of +84.

7%, compared to -77. 4% for Lee Enterprises, Incorporated (LEE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NYT returned +557. 1% versus THS's -73. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NWSA or NYT or GCI or THS or LEE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The New York Times Company (NYT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

28β versus TreeHouse Foods, Inc. 's 1. 18β — meaning THS is approximately 327% more volatile than NYT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The New York Times Company (NYT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 8% for Gannett Co. , Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NWSA or NYT or GCI or THS or LEE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The New York Times Company (NYT) is pulling ahead at 6.

6% versus -8. 0% for Lee Enterprises, Incorporated (LEE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: News Corporation grew EPS 350. 0% year-over-year, compared to -45. 7% for TreeHouse Foods, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NYT leads at 7. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NWSA or NYT or GCI or THS or LEE?

News Corporation (NWSA) is the more profitable company, earning 14.

0% net margin versus -6. 7% for Lee Enterprises, Incorporated — meaning it keeps 14. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NYT leads at 13. 6% versus -1. 7% for GCI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NWSA leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NWSA or NYT or GCI or THS or LEE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, TreeHouse Foods, Inc.

(THS) trades at 12. 8x forward P/E versus 51. 0x for Gannett Co. , Inc. — 38. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NWSA: 27. 4% to $32. 40.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NWSA or NYT or GCI or THS or LEE?

In this comparison, NWSA (1.

3% yield), NYT (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. GCI, THS, LEE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is NWSA or NYT or GCI or THS or LEE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The New York Times Company (NYT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

28), 0. 6% yield, +557. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NYT: +557. 1%, THS: -73. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NWSA and NYT and GCI and THS and LEE?

These companies operate in different sectors (NWSA (Communication Services) and NYT (Communication Services) and GCI (Communication Services) and THS (Consumer Defensive) and LEE (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: NWSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; NYT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GCI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; THS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LEE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. NWSA, NYT pay a dividend while GCI, THS, LEE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

NWSA

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NYT

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GCI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

THS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LEE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 34%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform NWSA and NYT and GCI and THS and LEE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(NWSA: 15.7% · NYT: 9.5%)
Net Margin>
%
(NWSA: 12.2% · NYT: 12.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(NWSA: 12.3x · NYT: 43.6x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.