Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NX vs AWI vs TREX vs APOG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NX
Quanex Building Products Corporation

Construction

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$916M
5Y Perf.+61.8%
AWI
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

Construction

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$7.05B
5Y Perf.+119.0%
TREX
Trex Company, Inc.

Construction

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.12B
5Y Perf.-34.8%
APOG
Apogee Enterprises, Inc.

Construction

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$787M
5Y Perf.+77.1%

NX vs AWI vs TREX vs APOG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NX logoNX
AWI logoAWI
TREX logoTREX
APOG logoAPOG
IndustryConstructionConstructionConstructionConstruction
Market Cap$916M$7.05B$4.12B$787M
Revenue (TTM)$1.85B$1.65B$1.18B$1.40B
Net Income (TTM)$-240M$306M$191M$54M
Gross Margin26.1%40.3%39.2%22.7%
Operating Margin-10.0%27.5%22.1%6.7%
Forward P/E10.0x19.9x24.0x10.6x
Total Debt$854M$532M$229M$286M
Cash & Equiv.$76M$113M$4M$40M

NX vs AWI vs TREX vs APOGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NX
AWI
TREX
APOG
StockMay 20May 26Return
Quanex Building Pro… (NX)100161.8+61.8%
Armstrong World Ind… (AWI)100219.0+119.0%
Trex Company, Inc. (TREX)10065.2-34.8%
Apogee Enterprises,… (APOG)100177.1+77.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NX vs AWI vs TREX vs APOG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AWI leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Quanex Building Products Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. APOG also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
NX
Quanex Building Products Corporation
The Growth Leader

NX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.

  • 43.8% revenue growth vs TREX's 2.0%
  • +23.2% vs TREX's -30.8%
Best for: growth and momentum
AWI
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
The Growth Play

AWI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 12.1%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.5%
  • 330.4% 10Y total return vs TREX's 239.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 59.0%, current ratio 1.46x
  • 18.6% margin vs NX's -13.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
TREX
Trex Company, Inc.
The Secondary Option

TREX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
APOG
Apogee Enterprises, Inc.
The Income Pick

APOG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.

  • Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 1.25, yield 2.8%
  • PEG 0.32 vs TREX's 7.16
  • Beta 1.25, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.65x
  • Lower P/E (10.6x vs 24.0x), PEG 0.32 vs 7.16
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNX logoNX43.8% revenue growth vs TREX's 2.0%
ValueAPOG logoAPOGLower P/E (10.6x vs 24.0x), PEG 0.32 vs 7.16
Quality / MarginsAWI logoAWI18.6% margin vs NX's -13.0%
Stability / SafetyAWI logoAWIBeta 0.82 vs NX's 1.89, lower leverage
DividendsAPOG logoAPOG2.8% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs AWI's 0.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)NX logoNX+23.2% vs TREX's -30.8%
Efficiency (ROA)AWI logoAWI16.0% ROA vs NX's -11.7%, ROIC 24.9% vs -8.8%

NX vs AWI vs TREX vs APOG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NXQuanex Building Products Corporation
FY 2024
NA Engineered Components
60.2%$650M
EU Engineered Components
21.4%$231M
NA Cabinet Components
18.4%$198M
AWIArmstrong World Industries, Inc.
FY 2025
Mineral Fiber
63.6%$1.0B
Architectural Specialties
36.4%$590M
TREXTrex Company, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

APOGApogee Enterprises, Inc.
FY 2026
Architectural Metals Segment
35.4%$504M
Architectural Services segment
30.8%$439M
Architectural
19.9%$284M
Performance Surfaces
13.9%$198M

NX vs AWI vs TREX vs APOG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAWILAGGINGTREX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

NX is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 1.6x TREX's $1.2B. AWI is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NX's -13.0%. On growth, AWI holds the edge at +7.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNX logoNXQuanex Building P…AWI logoAWIArmstrong World I…TREX logoTREXTrex Company, Inc.APOG logoAPOGApogee Enterprise…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.8B$1.6B$1.2B$1.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$81M$603M$309M$57M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$240M$306M$191M$54M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$95M$247M$263M$95M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+26.1%+40.3%+39.2%+22.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-10.0%+27.5%+22.1%+6.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-13.0%+18.6%+16.3%+3.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+5.1%+15.0%+22.3%+6.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.3%+7.1%+1.0%+1.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+71.9%-1.9%+3.6%+6.1%
AWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NX leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 14.5x trailing earnings, APOG trades at a 38% valuation discount to AWI's 23.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), APOG offers better value at 0.43x vs TREX's 6.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricNX logoNXQuanex Building P…AWI logoAWIArmstrong World I…TREX logoTREXTrex Company, Inc.APOG logoAPOGApogee Enterprise…
Market CapShares × price$916M$7.0B$4.1B$787M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.7B$7.5B$4.3B$1.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-3.70x23.32x22.00x14.52x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.99x19.87x23.95x10.64x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate6.58x0.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple17.23x13.53x21.95x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.50x4.35x3.51x0.56x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.28x7.99x4.05x1.53x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.96x28.63x30.60x8.27x
NX leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AWI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

AWI delivers a 34.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $-30 for NX. TREX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NX's 1.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AWI scores 9/9 vs NX's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricNX logoNXQuanex Building P…AWI logoAWIArmstrong World I…TREX logoTREXTrex Company, Inc.APOG logoAPOGApogee Enterprise…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-30.2%+34.8%+18.8%+10.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-11.7%+16.0%+12.3%+4.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital-8.8%+24.9%+16.4%+8.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-10.4%+26.5%+23.2%+9.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94967
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.18x0.59x0.22x0.56x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$778M$419M$225M$247M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$76M$113M$4M$40M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$854M$532M$229M$286M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-3.30x13.31x5.97x
AWI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AWI five years ago would be worth $16,301 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,599 for TREX. Over the past 12 months, NX leads with a +23.2% total return vs TREX's -30.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AWI at 36.0% vs TREX's -11.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNX logoNXQuanex Building P…AWI logoAWIArmstrong World I…TREX logoTREXTrex Company, Inc.APOG logoAPOGApogee Enterprise…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+31.1%-16.0%+9.3%-1.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+23.2%+11.5%-30.8%-2.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+6.0%+151.8%-30.4%-0.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-22.0%+63.0%-64.0%+12.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+23.7%+330.4%+239.9%+10.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+2.0%+36.0%-11.4%-0.0%
AWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NX and AWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

AWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NX's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NX currently trades 87.3% from its 52-week high vs TREX's 56.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNX logoNXQuanex Building P…AWI logoAWIArmstrong World I…TREX logoTREXTrex Company, Inc.APOG logoAPOGApogee Enterprise…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.89x0.82x1.47x1.25x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$22.98$206.08$68.78$49.99
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$11.04$148.25$29.77$30.75
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+87.3%+80.1%+56.9%+73.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.641.351.353.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded458K494K1.7M253K
Evenly matched — NX and AWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

APOG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: NX as "Hold", AWI as "Buy", TREX as "Hold", APOG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 92.7% upside for APOG (target: $71) vs 13.6% for TREX (target: $45). For income investors, APOG offers the higher dividend yield at 2.83% vs AWI's 0.77%.

MetricNX logoNXQuanex Building P…AWI logoAWIArmstrong World I…TREX logoTREXTrex Company, Inc.APOG logoAPOGApogee Enterprise…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$197.50$44.50$70.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts1026316
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.6%+0.8%+2.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises08214
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.32$1.27$1.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.5%+1.8%+1.3%+1.9%
APOG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

AWI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallArmstrong World Industries,… (AWI)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NX vs AWI vs TREX vs APOG: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NX or AWI or TREX or APOG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) is the stronger pick with 43.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 0% for Trex Company, Inc. (TREX). Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (10. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NX or AWI or TREX or APOG?

On trailing P/E, Apogee Enterprises, Inc.

(APOG) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus Armstrong World Industries, Inc. at 23. 3x. On forward P/E, Quanex Building Products Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Apogee Enterprises, Inc. wins at 0. 32x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 16x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NX or AWI or TREX or APOG?

Over the past 5 years, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

(AWI) delivered a total return of +63. 0%, compared to -64. 0% for Trex Company, Inc. (TREX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AWI returned +330. 4% versus APOG's +10. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NX or AWI or TREX or APOG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

(AWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Quanex Building Products Corporation's 1. 89β — meaning NX is approximately 131% more volatile than AWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 118% for Quanex Building Products Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NX or AWI or TREX or APOG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) is pulling ahead at 43.

8% versus 2. 0% for Trex Company, Inc. (TREX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Armstrong World Industries, Inc. grew EPS 17. 6% year-over-year, compared to -703. 3% for Quanex Building Products Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NX leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NX or AWI or TREX or APOG?

Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

(AWI) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 0% net margin versus -13. 6% for Quanex Building Products Corporation — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AWI leads at 26. 6% versus -10. 6% for NX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AWI leads at 40. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NX or AWI or TREX or APOG more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 32x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 16x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 24. 0x for Trex Company, Inc. — 14. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for APOG: 92. 7% to $70. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NX or AWI or TREX or APOG?

In this comparison, APOG (2.

8% yield), NX (1. 6% yield), AWI (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. TREX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is NX or AWI or TREX or APOG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

(AWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 0. 8% yield, +330. 4% 10Y return). Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AWI: +330. 4%, NX: +23. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NX and AWI and TREX and APOG?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: NX is a small-cap high-growth stock; AWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TREX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; APOG is a small-cap deep-value stock. NX, AWI, APOG pay a dividend while TREX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

NX

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 15%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AWI

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TREX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

APOG

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 13%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform NX and AWI and TREX and APOG on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(NX: 2.3% · AWI: 7.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.