Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NX vs AWI vs TREX vs APOG vs BLDR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction
Construction
Construction
Construction
NX vs AWI vs TREX vs APOG vs BLDR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction | Construction | Construction | Construction | Construction |
| Market Cap | $916M | $7.05B | $4.12B | $787M | $8.79B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.85B | $1.65B | $1.18B | $1.40B | $14.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-240M | $306M | $191M | $54M | $292M |
| Gross Margin | 26.1% | 40.3% | 39.2% | 22.7% | 29.9% |
| Operating Margin | -10.0% | 27.5% | 22.1% | 6.7% | 4.2% |
| Forward P/E | 10.1x | 19.5x | 24.2x | 10.7x | 18.0x |
| Total Debt | $854M | $532M | $229M | $286M | $5.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $76M | $113M | $4M | $40M | $182M |
NX vs AWI vs TREX vs APOG vs BLDR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quanex Building Pro… (NX) | 100 | 163.3 | +63.3% |
| Armstrong World Ind… (AWI) | 100 | 214.6 | +114.6% |
| Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) | 100 | 66.9 | -33.1% |
| Apogee Enterprises,… (APOG) | 100 | 177.5 | +77.5% |
| Builders FirstSourc… (BLDR) | 100 | 371.9 | +271.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NX vs AWI vs TREX vs APOG vs BLDR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 43.8% revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4%
- +23.2% vs TREX's -30.8%
AWI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 12.1%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 59.0%, current ratio 1.46x
- 18.6% margin vs NX's -13.0%
- Beta 0.82 vs NX's 1.89, lower leverage
TREX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
APOG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 1.25, yield 2.8%
- PEG 0.32 vs TREX's 7.25
- Beta 1.25, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.65x
- Lower P/E (10.7x vs 18.0x), PEG 0.32 vs 2.28
BLDR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 6.1% 10Y total return vs AWI's 330.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.8% revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.7x vs 18.0x), PEG 0.32 vs 2.28 | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.6% margin vs NX's -13.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs NX's 1.89, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs AWI's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.2% vs TREX's -30.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.0% ROA vs NX's -11.7%, ROIC 24.9% vs -8.8% |
NX vs AWI vs TREX vs APOG vs BLDR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NX vs AWI vs TREX vs APOG vs BLDR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AWI leads in 3 of 6 categories
NX leads 1 • APOG leads 1 • TREX leads 0 • BLDR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLDR is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.8B annually — 12.6x TREX's $1.2B. AWI is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NX's -13.0%. On growth, AWI holds the edge at +7.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.8B | $1.6B | $1.2B | $1.4B | $14.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$81M | $603M | $309M | $57M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$240M | $306M | $191M | $54M | $292M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $95M | $247M | $263M | $95M | $862M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.1% | +40.3% | +39.2% | +22.7% | +29.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.0% | +27.5% | +22.1% | +6.7% | +4.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.0% | +18.6% | +16.3% | +3.9% | +2.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.1% | +15.0% | +22.3% | +6.8% | +5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.3% | +7.1% | +1.0% | +1.6% | -10.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +71.9% | -1.9% | +3.6% | +6.1% | -151.2% |
Valuation Metrics
NX leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, APOG trades at a 38% valuation discount to AWI's 23.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), APOG offers better value at 0.43x vs TREX's 6.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $916M | $7.0B | $4.1B | $787M | $8.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.7B | $7.5B | $4.3B | $1.0B | $14.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.70x | 23.32x | 22.00x | 14.52x | 20.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.09x | 19.47x | 24.24x | 10.66x | 18.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 6.58x | 0.43x | 2.59x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 17.23x | 13.53x | 21.95x | 10.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.50x | 4.35x | 3.51x | 0.56x | 0.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.28x | 7.99x | 4.05x | 1.53x | 2.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.96x | 28.63x | 30.60x | 8.27x | 10.30x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AWI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AWI delivers a 34.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $-30 for NX. TREX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BLDR's 1.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AWI scores 9/9 vs NX's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -30.2% | +34.8% | +18.8% | +10.8% | +6.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.7% | +16.0% | +12.3% | +4.8% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.8% | +24.9% | +16.4% | +8.1% | +6.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -10.4% | +26.5% | +23.2% | +9.7% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.18x | 0.59x | 0.22x | 0.56x | 1.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $778M | $419M | $225M | $247M | $5.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $76M | $113M | $4M | $40M | $182M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $854M | $532M | $229M | $286M | $5.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.30x | 13.31x | — | 5.97x | 2.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AWI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AWI five years ago would be worth $16,301 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,599 for TREX. Over the past 12 months, NX leads with a +23.2% total return vs TREX's -30.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AWI at 36.0% vs TREX's -11.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +31.1% | -16.0% | +9.3% | -1.3% | -24.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.2% | +11.5% | -30.8% | -2.8% | -25.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.0% | +151.8% | -30.4% | -0.1% | -30.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.0% | +63.0% | -64.0% | +12.9% | +51.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.7% | +330.4% | +239.9% | +10.5% | +614.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.0% | +36.0% | -11.4% | -0.0% | -11.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NX and AWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NX's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NX currently trades 87.3% from its 52-week high vs BLDR's 52.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.83x | 0.81x | 1.52x | 1.25x | 1.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.98 | $206.08 | $68.78 | $49.99 | $151.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.04 | $148.25 | $29.77 | $30.75 | $73.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.3% | +80.1% | +56.9% | +73.2% | +52.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.6 | 41.3 | 51.3 | 53.6 | 42.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 458K | 494K | 1.7M | 253K | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
APOG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NX as "Hold", AWI as "Buy", TREX as "Hold", APOG as "Hold", BLDR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 92.7% upside for APOG (target: $71) vs 19.6% for AWI (target: $198). For income investors, APOG offers the higher dividend yield at 2.83% vs AWI's 0.77%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $197.50 | $47.44 | $70.50 | $106.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 26 | 31 | 6 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.6% | +0.8% | — | +2.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 8 | 2 | 14 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.32 | $1.27 | — | $1.04 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.5% | +1.8% | +1.3% | +1.9% | +4.7% |
AWI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
NX vs AWI vs TREX vs APOG vs BLDR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NX or AWI or TREX or APOG or BLDR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) is the stronger pick with 43.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NX or AWI or TREX or APOG or BLDR?
On trailing P/E, Apogee Enterprises, Inc.
(APOG) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus Armstrong World Industries, Inc. at 23. 3x. On forward P/E, Quanex Building Products Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Apogee Enterprises, Inc. wins at 0. 32x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 25x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NX or AWI or TREX or APOG or BLDR?
Over the past 5 years, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) delivered a total return of +63. 0%, compared to -64. 0% for Trex Company, Inc. (TREX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BLDR returned +596. 0% versus APOG's +10. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NX or AWI or TREX or APOG or BLDR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Quanex Building Products Corporation's 1. 83β — meaning NX is approximately 126% more volatile than AWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 130% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NX or AWI or TREX or APOG or BLDR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) is pulling ahead at 43.
8% versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Armstrong World Industries, Inc. grew EPS 17. 6% year-over-year, compared to -703. 3% for Quanex Building Products Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NX leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NX or AWI or TREX or APOG or BLDR?
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 0% net margin versus -13. 6% for Quanex Building Products Corporation — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AWI leads at 26. 6% versus -10. 6% for NX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AWI leads at 40. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NX or AWI or TREX or APOG or BLDR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 32x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 25x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) trades at 10. 1x forward P/E versus 24. 2x for Trex Company, Inc. — 14. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for APOG: 92. 7% to $70. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — NX or AWI or TREX or APOG or BLDR?
In this comparison, APOG (2.
8% yield), NX (1. 6% yield), AWI (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. TREX, BLDR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NX or AWI or TREX or APOG or BLDR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 0. 8% yield, +322. 1% 10Y return). Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) carries a higher beta of 1. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AWI: +322. 1%, TREX: +248. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NX and AWI and TREX and APOG and BLDR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NX is a small-cap high-growth stock; AWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TREX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; APOG is a small-cap deep-value stock; BLDR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. NX, AWI, APOG pay a dividend while TREX, BLDR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.