Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NXDR vs MGNI vs PUBM vs DV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Advertising Agencies
Software - Application
Software - Application
NXDR vs MGNI vs PUBM vs DV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Advertising Agencies | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $744M | $2.01B | $485M | $1.76B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $265M | $723M | $282M | $764M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-44M | $159M | $-17M | $55M |
| Gross Margin | 83.9% | 63.4% | 63.2% | 82.2% |
| Operating Margin | -22.7% | 14.8% | -7.3% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.4x | — | 20.5x |
| Total Debt | $56M | $279M | $44M | $100M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $63M | $553M | $146M | $259M |
NXDR vs MGNI vs PUBM vs DV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nextdoor Holdings, … (NXDR) | 100 | 18.5 | -81.5% |
| Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) | 100 | 35.0 | -65.0% |
| PubMatic, Inc. (PUBM) | 100 | 19.9 | -80.1% |
| DoubleVerify Holdin… (DV) | 100 | 30.8 | -69.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NXDR vs MGNI vs PUBM vs DV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NXDR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +27.2% vs DV's -19.9%
MGNI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -4.7% 10Y total return vs PUBM's -65.2%
- Lower P/E (13.4x vs 20.5x)
- 22.0% margin vs NXDR's -16.5%
- 5.3% ROA vs NXDR's -9.1%, ROIC 9.5% vs -12.4%
PUBM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
DV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- beta 1.03
- Rev growth 13.9%, EPS growth -6.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 8.8%, current ratio 4.27x
- Beta 1.03, current ratio 4.27x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.9% revenue growth vs PUBM's -2.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.4x vs 20.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.0% margin vs NXDR's -16.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.03 vs MGNI's 1.63, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +27.2% vs DV's -19.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.3% ROA vs NXDR's -9.1%, ROIC 9.5% vs -12.4% |
NXDR vs MGNI vs PUBM vs DV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NXDR vs MGNI vs PUBM vs DV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MGNI leads in 2 of 6 categories
PUBM leads 1 • NXDR leads 0 • DV leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NXDR and MGNI and DV each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DV is the larger business by revenue, generating $764M annually — 2.9x NXDR's $265M. MGNI is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NXDR's -16.5%. On growth, NXDR holds the edge at +13.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $265M | $723M | $282M | $764M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$61M | $145M | $11M | $148M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$44M | $159M | -$17M | $55M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | $44M | $43M | $135M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +83.9% | +63.4% | +63.2% | +82.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -22.7% | +14.8% | -7.3% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -16.5% | +22.0% | -6.2% | +7.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +6.1% | +15.1% | +17.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.8% | +5.5% | -2.0% | +9.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +47.5% | +142.9% | -35.0% | +3.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PUBM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, MGNI trades at a 59% valuation discount to DV's 36.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MGNI's 11.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PUBM's 14.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $744M | $2.0B | $485M | $1.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $737M | $1.7B | $384M | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.71x | 14.74x | -33.03x | 36.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.45x | — | 20.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.99x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.43x | 14.47x | 11.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.89x | 2.81x | 1.72x | 2.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.72x | 2.33x | 1.83x | 1.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 126.36x | 12.11x | 7.28x | 10.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MGNI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MGNI delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-10 for NXDR. DV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGNI's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MGNI scores 6/9 vs DV's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.3% | +18.6% | -7.0% | +5.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.1% | +5.3% | -2.6% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -12.4% | +9.5% | -6.8% | +6.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.3% | +7.3% | -5.5% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.30x | 0.17x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | -$275M | -$102M | -$159M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $63M | $553M | $146M | $259M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $56M | $279M | $44M | $100M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 4.03x | — | 43.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MGNI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MGNI five years ago would be worth $3,906 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,893 for NXDR. Over the past 12 months, NXDR leads with a +27.2% total return vs DV's -19.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MGNI at 16.7% vs DV's -26.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.7% | -12.8% | +19.2% | -0.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.2% | +12.6% | +2.0% | -19.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.3% | +58.7% | -18.5% | -60.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.1% | -60.9% | -77.1% | -70.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.8% | -4.7% | -65.2% | -68.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.2% | +16.7% | -6.6% | -26.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PUBM and DV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DV is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MGNI's 1.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PUBM currently trades 73.8% from its 52-week high vs NXDR's 51.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 1.63x | 1.51x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.72 | $26.65 | $13.88 | $16.82 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.32 | $10.82 | $6.21 | $7.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.6% | +52.5% | +73.8% | +64.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.1 | 55.4 | 66.5 | 61.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.6M | 2.1M | 746K | 2.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NXDR as "Hold", MGNI as "Buy", PUBM as "Buy", DV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 69.3% upside for NXDR (target: $3) vs 28.6% for MGNI (target: $18).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.25 | $18.00 | $14.00 | $15.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 31 | 16 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.5% | +2.3% | +9.6% | +8.1% |
MGNI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). PUBM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
NXDR vs MGNI vs PUBM vs DV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NXDR or MGNI or PUBM or DV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc.
(DV) is the stronger pick with 13. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 9% for PubMatic, Inc. (PUBM). Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (13. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NXDR or MGNI or PUBM or DV?
On trailing P/E, Magnite, Inc.
(MGNI) is the cheapest at 14. 7x versus DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. at 36. 2x. On forward P/E, Magnite, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NXDR or MGNI or PUBM or DV?
Over the past 5 years, Magnite, Inc.
(MGNI) delivered a total return of -60. 9%, compared to -81. 1% for Nextdoor Holdings, Inc. (NXDR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MGNI returned -4. 7% versus NXDR's -80. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NXDR or MGNI or PUBM or DV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc.
(DV) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus Magnite, Inc. 's 1. 63β — meaning MGNI is approximately 59% more volatile than DV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. (DV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 30% for Magnite, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NXDR or MGNI or PUBM or DV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc.
(DV) is pulling ahead at 13. 9% versus -2. 9% for PubMatic, Inc. (PUBM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Magnite, Inc. grew EPS 493. 8% year-over-year, compared to -234. 8% for PubMatic, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DV leads at 18. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NXDR or MGNI or PUBM or DV?
Magnite, Inc.
(MGNI) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 3% net margin versus -21. 0% for Nextdoor Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MGNI leads at 13. 7% versus -27. 9% for NXDR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXDR leads at 84. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NXDR or MGNI or PUBM or DV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Magnite, Inc.
(MGNI) trades at 13. 4x forward P/E versus 20. 5x for DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. — 7. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NXDR: 69. 3% to $3. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — NXDR or MGNI or PUBM or DV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is NXDR or MGNI or PUBM or DV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc.
(DV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 03)). Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DV: -68. 9%, MGNI: -4. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NXDR and MGNI and PUBM and DV?
These companies operate in different sectors (NXDR (Communication Services) and MGNI (Communication Services) and PUBM (Technology) and DV (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NXDR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MGNI is a small-cap deep-value stock; PUBM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DV is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 6%
- Gross Margin > 50%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.