Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NXGL vs DERM vs SKIN vs PRGO vs MCK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Household & Personal Products
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Medical - Distribution
NXGL vs DERM vs SKIN vs PRGO vs MCK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Household & Personal Products | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Medical - Distribution |
| Market Cap | $5M | $104M | $75M | $1.62B | $90.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12M | $56M | $296M | $4.18B | $403.43B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $-9M | $-6M | $-1.82B | $4.76B |
| Gross Margin | 38.3% | 67.5% | 64.9% | 34.2% | 3.6% |
| Operating Margin | -25.5% | -12.2% | -3.6% | -4.1% | 1.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 69.9x | — | 5.5x | 16.7x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $26M | $379M | $3.97B | $8.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $20M | $233M | $532M | $3.98B |
NXGL vs DERM vs SKIN vs PRGO vs MCK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEXGEL, Inc. (NXGL) | 100 | 22.7 | -77.3% |
| Journey Medical Cor… (DERM) | 100 | 94.2 | -5.8% |
| The Beauty Health C… (SKIN) | 100 | 2.4 | -97.6% |
| Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) | 100 | 30.1 | -69.9% |
| McKesson Corporation (MCK) | 100 | 296.3 | +196.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NXGL vs DERM vs SKIN vs PRGO vs MCK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NXGL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 112.5%, EPS growth 10.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 77.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.85, Low D/E 46.5%, current ratio 2.07x
- 112.5% revenue growth vs DERM's -29.1%
- Beta 0.85 vs DERM's 1.78, lower leverage
DERM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, SKIN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PRGO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.21, yield 9.8%
- Beta 1.21, yield 9.8%, current ratio 2.76x
- Lower P/E (5.5x vs 16.7x)
- 9.8% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs MCK's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
MCK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 339.0% 10Y total return vs DERM's -46.6%
- 1.2% margin vs PRGO's -43.5%
- +7.2% vs NXGL's -77.3%
- 5.7% ROA vs NXGL's -26.9%, ROIC 74.5% vs -43.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 112.5% revenue growth vs DERM's -29.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.5x vs 16.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.2% margin vs PRGO's -43.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.85 vs DERM's 1.78, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.8% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs MCK's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.2% vs NXGL's -77.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.7% ROA vs NXGL's -26.9%, ROIC 74.5% vs -43.1% |
NXGL vs DERM vs SKIN vs PRGO vs MCK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NXGL vs DERM vs SKIN vs PRGO vs MCK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MCK leads in 4 of 6 categories
PRGO leads 1 • NXGL leads 0 • DERM leads 0 • SKIN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCK is the larger business by revenue, generating $403.4B annually — 34584.7x NXGL's $12M. MCK is the more profitable business, keeping 1.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRGO's -43.5%. On growth, MCK holds the edge at +6.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12M | $56M | $296M | $4.2B | $403.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | -$3M | $9M | $58M | $6.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | -$9M | -$6M | -$1.8B | $4.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$3M | $29M | $108M | $6.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.3% | +67.5% | +64.9% | +34.2% | +3.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -25.5% | -12.2% | -3.6% | -4.1% | +1.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -24.7% | -15.5% | -2.0% | -43.5% | +1.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -21.8% | -4.8% | +9.7% | +2.6% | +1.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.2% | +1.0% | -6.7% | -7.2% | +6.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.3% | +5.9% | +38.0% | -56.4% | +37.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PRGO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PRGO's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SKIN's 48.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5M | $104M | $75M | $1.6B | $90.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $109M | $221M | $5.1B | $94.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.19x | -7.04x | -3.63x | -1.14x | 19.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 69.93x | — | 5.53x | 16.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 48.65x | 7.43x | 15.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.56x | 1.85x | 0.25x | 0.38x | 0.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.64x | 5.16x | 1.29x | 0.55x | 11.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 2.02x | 11.17x | 14.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MCK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MCK delivers a 3.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-52 for NXGL. NXGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SKIN's 6.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SKIN scores 7/9 vs DERM's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -51.7% | -45.4% | -9.4% | -50.7% | +3.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -26.9% | -10.8% | -1.2% | -19.8% | +5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -43.1% | -56.8% | -6.8% | +3.7% | +74.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -44.7% | -34.2% | -4.5% | +4.3% | +43.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 1.28x | 6.20x | 1.35x | 1.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1M | $5M | $146M | $3.4B | $4.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $20M | $233M | $532M | $4.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $26M | $379M | $4.0B | $8.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -40.04x | -1.52x | 0.79x | -7.20x | 33.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MCK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MCK five years ago would be worth $37,043 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $471 for SKIN. Over the past 12 months, MCK leads with a +7.2% total return vs NXGL's -77.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DERM at 45.4% vs SKIN's -62.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -67.2% | -31.9% | -58.6% | -13.6% | -10.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -77.3% | -26.3% | -53.2% | -52.0% | +7.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.9% | +207.3% | -94.7% | -58.1% | +102.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.1% | -46.6% | -95.3% | -60.3% | +270.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.1% | -46.6% | -94.6% | -77.7% | +339.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.3% | +45.4% | -62.5% | -25.2% | +26.4% |
Risk & Volatility
MCK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MCK is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DERM's 1.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MCK currently trades 73.7% from its 52-week high vs NXGL's 20.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.85x | 1.78x | 1.71x | 1.21x | -0.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.97 | $9.55 | $2.69 | $28.44 | $999.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.56 | $4.31 | $0.57 | $9.23 | $637.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +20.0% | +53.1% | +21.6% | +41.2% | +73.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.1 | 39.7 | 49.5 | 53.1 | 21.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 371K | 231K | 844K | 3.3M | 782K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PRGO and MCK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DERM as "Buy", SKIN as "Hold", PRGO as "Hold", MCK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 209.1% upside for PRGO (target: $36) vs 35.1% for MCK (target: $995). For income investors, PRGO offers the higher dividend yield at 9.82% vs MCK's 0.42%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $11.75 | $1.30 | $36.20 | $994.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 | 13 | 36 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +9.8% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 10 | 18 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.15 | $3.07 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MCK leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRGO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
NXGL vs DERM vs SKIN vs PRGO vs MCK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NXGL or DERM or SKIN or PRGO or MCK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NEXGEL, Inc.
(NXGL) is the stronger pick with 112. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -29. 1% for Journey Medical Corporation (DERM). McKesson Corporation (MCK) offers the better valuation at 19. 2x trailing P/E (16. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Journey Medical Corporation (DERM) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NXGL or DERM or SKIN or PRGO or MCK?
On forward P/E, Perrigo Company plc is actually cheaper at 5.
5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NXGL or DERM or SKIN or PRGO or MCK?
Over the past 5 years, McKesson Corporation (MCK) delivered a total return of +270.
4%, compared to -95. 3% for The Beauty Health Company (SKIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCK returned +339. 0% versus SKIN's -94. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NXGL or DERM or SKIN or PRGO or MCK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), McKesson Corporation (MCK) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
02β versus Journey Medical Corporation's 1. 78β — meaning DERM is approximately -10971% more volatile than MCK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NEXGEL, Inc. (NXGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 6% for The Beauty Health Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NXGL or DERM or SKIN or PRGO or MCK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NEXGEL, Inc.
(NXGL) is pulling ahead at 112. 5% versus -29. 1% for Journey Medical Corporation (DERM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Beauty Health Company grew EPS 55. 6% year-over-year, compared to -723. 2% for Perrigo Company plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, NXGL leads at 77. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NXGL or DERM or SKIN or PRGO or MCK?
McKesson Corporation (MCK) is the more profitable company, earning 1.
2% net margin versus -37. 8% for NEXGEL, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRGO leads at 8. 1% versus -40. 9% for NXGL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SKIN leads at 65. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NXGL or DERM or SKIN or PRGO or MCK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) trades at 5.
5x forward P/E versus 69. 9x for Journey Medical Corporation — 64. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRGO: 209. 1% to $36. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — NXGL or DERM or SKIN or PRGO or MCK?
In this comparison, PRGO (9.
8% yield), MCK (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. NXGL, DERM, SKIN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NXGL or DERM or SKIN or PRGO or MCK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, McKesson Corporation (MCK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
02), +339. 0% 10Y return). Journey Medical Corporation (DERM) carries a higher beta of 1. 78 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MCK: +339. 0%, DERM: -46. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NXGL and DERM and SKIN and PRGO and MCK?
These companies operate in different sectors (NXGL (Healthcare) and DERM (Healthcare) and SKIN (Consumer Defensive) and PRGO (Healthcare) and MCK (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NXGL is a small-cap high-growth stock; DERM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SKIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRGO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MCK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. PRGO pays a dividend while NXGL, DERM, SKIN, MCK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.