Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NXPI vs SWKS vs TXN vs QRVO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
NXPI vs SWKS vs TXN vs QRVO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $74.42B | $10.04B | $262.15B | $8.39B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12.61B | $4.04B | $18.44B | $3.68B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.65B | $361M | $5.37B | $339M |
| Gross Margin | 54.9% | 41.1% | 57.3% | 45.9% |
| Operating Margin | 31.8% | 9.4% | 35.3% | 11.2% |
| Forward P/E | 20.1x | 13.4x | 38.1x | 13.9x |
| Total Debt | $12.22B | $1.20B | $15.39B | $1.55B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.27B | $1.16B | $3.23B | $1.22B |
NXPI vs SWKS vs TXN vs QRVO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NXP Semiconductors … (NXPI) | 100 | 306.7 | +206.7% |
| Skyworks Solutions,… (SWKS) | 100 | 56.3 | -43.7% |
| Texas Instruments I… (TXN) | 100 | 242.5 | +142.5% |
| Qorvo, Inc. (QRVO) | 100 | 86.4 | -13.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NXPI vs SWKS vs TXN vs QRVO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NXPI plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
SWKS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (13.4x vs 13.9x)
- 4.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs TXN's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
TXN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 1.09, yield 1.9%
- 476.4% 10Y total return vs NXPI's 272.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.09, Low D/E 94.6%, current ratio 4.35x
- Beta 1.09, yield 1.9%, current ratio 4.35x
QRVO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -1.1%, EPS growth 5.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% revenue growth vs NXPI's -2.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.4x vs 13.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.1% margin vs SWKS's 8.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs NXPI's 1.66, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs TXN's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +77.2% vs SWKS's +3.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.5% ROA vs SWKS's 4.6%, ROIC 15.8% vs 6.3% |
NXPI vs SWKS vs TXN vs QRVO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NXPI vs SWKS vs TXN vs QRVO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TXN leads in 3 of 6 categories
SWKS leads 1 • NXPI leads 0 • QRVO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXN is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.4B annually — 5.0x QRVO's $3.7B. TXN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SWKS's 8.9%. On growth, TXN holds the edge at +18.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12.6B | $4.0B | $18.4B | $3.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.7B | $842M | $8.1B | $607M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.7B | $361M | $5.4B | $339M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.0B | $697M | $3.7B | $680M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.9% | +41.1% | +57.3% | +45.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +31.8% | +9.4% | +35.3% | +11.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.0% | +8.9% | +29.1% | +9.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.4% | +17.2% | +20.2% | +18.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.2% | -1.0% | +18.6% | -7.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +130.7% | -44.2% | +32.0% | -3.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SWKS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.7x trailing earnings, SWKS trades at a 59% valuation discount to TXN's 52.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SWKS's 10.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TXN's 34.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $74.4B | $10.0B | $262.1B | $8.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $83.4B | $10.1B | $274.3B | $8.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 37.08x | 21.68x | 52.83x | 25.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.12x | 13.39x | 38.12x | 13.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.33x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.13x | 10.47x | 34.20x | 21.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.07x | 2.46x | 14.83x | 2.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.17x | 1.80x | 16.15x | 2.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 30.71x | 9.08x | 100.71x | 12.35x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SWKS and TXN each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TXN delivers a 32.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $6 for SWKS. SWKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXPI's 1.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QRVO scores 8/9 vs NXPI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +25.2% | +6.3% | +32.5% | +9.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.1% | +4.6% | +15.5% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.5% | +6.3% | +15.8% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.1% | +7.0% | +19.0% | +8.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.17x | 0.21x | 0.95x | 0.46x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9.0B | $42M | $12.2B | $330M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.3B | $1.2B | $3.2B | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12.2B | $1.2B | $15.4B | $1.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.78x | 14.46x | 12.06x | 6.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TXN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TXN five years ago would be worth $17,216 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,800 for SWKS. Over the past 12 months, TXN leads with a +77.2% total return vs SWKS's +3.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TXN at 22.8% vs SWKS's -10.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +33.7% | +4.8% | +63.8% | +4.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +58.5% | +3.4% | +77.2% | +25.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +82.6% | -28.7% | +85.2% | -3.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.6% | -52.0% | +72.2% | -47.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +272.5% | +33.9% | +476.4% | +98.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.2% | -10.7% | +22.8% | -1.3% |
Risk & Volatility
TXN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TXN is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NXPI's 1.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TXN currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs SWKS's 73.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.66x | 1.30x | 1.09x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $303.88 | $90.90 | $292.64 | $106.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $183.00 | $51.92 | $152.73 | $71.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.0% | +73.5% | +98.4% | +85.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.6 | 56.1 | 75.2 | 56.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.1M | 3.3M | 6.7M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SWKS and TXN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NXPI as "Buy", SWKS as "Buy", TXN as "Buy", QRVO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 8.3% upside for SWKS (target: $72) vs -17.7% for NXPI (target: $243). For income investors, SWKS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.18% vs NXPI's 1.37%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $242.60 | $72.30 | $253.71 | $88.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 46 | 60 | 65 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | +4.2% | +1.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 8 | 12 | 22 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.03 | $2.79 | $5.48 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | +0.4% | +0.6% | +6.3% |
TXN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). SWKS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
NXPI vs SWKS vs TXN vs QRVO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NXPI or SWKS or TXN or QRVO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the stronger pick with 13.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 7% for NXP Semiconductors N. V. (NXPI). Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) offers the better valuation at 21. 7x trailing P/E (13. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NXP Semiconductors N. V. (NXPI) a "Buy" — based on 46 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NXPI or SWKS or TXN or QRVO?
On trailing P/E, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) is the cheapest at 21. 7x versus Texas Instruments Incorporated at 52. 8x. On forward P/E, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NXPI or SWKS or TXN or QRVO?
Over the past 5 years, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) delivered a total return of +72.
2%, compared to -52. 0% for Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TXN returned +476. 4% versus SWKS's +33. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NXPI or SWKS or TXN or QRVO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
09β versus NXP Semiconductors N. V. 's 1. 66β — meaning NXPI is approximately 52% more volatile than TXN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 117% for NXP Semiconductors N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NXPI or SWKS or TXN or QRVO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is pulling ahead at 13.
0% versus -2. 7% for NXP Semiconductors N. V. (NXPI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Qorvo, Inc. grew EPS 524. 1% year-over-year, compared to -18. 3% for NXP Semiconductors N. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, QRVO leads at 1. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NXPI or SWKS or TXN or QRVO?
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the more profitable company, earning 28.
3% net margin versus 9. 2% for Qorvo, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TXN leads at 34. 1% versus 11. 2% for QRVO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TXN leads at 57. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NXPI or SWKS or TXN or QRVO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) trades at 13. 4x forward P/E versus 38. 1x for Texas Instruments Incorporated — 24. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SWKS: 8. 3% to $72. 30.
08Which pays a better dividend — NXPI or SWKS or TXN or QRVO?
In this comparison, SWKS (4.
2% yield), TXN (1. 9% yield), NXPI (1. 4% yield) pay a dividend. QRVO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NXPI or SWKS or TXN or QRVO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
09), 1. 9% yield, +476. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXN: +476. 4%, QRVO: +98. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NXPI and SWKS and TXN and QRVO?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NXPI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SWKS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; TXN is a large-cap quality compounder stock; QRVO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. NXPI, SWKS, TXN pay a dividend while QRVO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.