NXST vs FOX

For growth investors, Fox Corporation (FOX) is the stronger pick with 16.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 5% for Nexstar Media Group, Inc. (NXST). Fox Corporation (FOX) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E (12. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nexstar Media Group, Inc. (NXST) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Fox Corporation (FOX) is the cheapest at 11.

5x versus Nexstar Media Group, Inc. at 65. 7x. On forward P/E, Nexstar Media Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Fox Corporation (FOX) delivered a total return of +60.

3%, compared to +50. 3% for Nexstar Media Group, Inc. (NXST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NXST returned +335. 9% versus FOX's +103. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fox Corporation (FOX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

51β versus Nexstar Media Group, Inc. 's 0. 73β — meaning NXST is approximately 41% more volatile than FOX relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fox Corporation (FOX) is pulling ahead at 16.

6% versus -8. 5% for Nexstar Media Group, Inc. (NXST). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fox Corporation grew EPS 56. 9% year-over-year, compared to -86. 0% for Nexstar Media Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FOX leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Fox Corporation (FOX) is the more profitable company, earning 13.

9% net margin versus 2. 2% for Nexstar Media Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FOX leads at 19. 8% versus 17. 2% for NXST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXST leads at 36. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Nexstar Media Group, Inc.

(NXST) trades at 8. 0x forward P/E versus 12. 1x for Fox Corporation — 4. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FOX: 40. 5% to $79. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Nexstar Media Group, Inc. (NXST) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 1. 1% for Fox Corporation (FOX).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Fox Corporation (FOX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

51), 1. 1% yield, +103. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FOX: +103. 2%, NXST: +335. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: NXST is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FOX is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.