Renewable Utilities
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NXXT vs NRGV vs MVST vs SPWR vs EVGO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Renewable Utilities
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Solar
Specialty Retail
NXXT vs NRGV vs MVST vs SPWR vs EVGO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Renewable Utilities | Renewable Utilities | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Solar | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $2M | $716M | $611M | $866M | $596M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $66M | $217M | $428M | $315M | $418M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-62M | $-115M | $-29M | $-42M | $-47M |
| Gross Margin | 8.0% | 22.1% | 28.6% | 50.4% | 20.2% |
| Operating Margin | -73.7% | -35.8% | 1.6% | -2.7% | -26.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 31.5x | 5.1x | — |
| Total Debt | $8M | $95M | $186M | $188M | $107M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $438K | $58M | $105M | $10M | $151M |
NXXT vs NRGV vs MVST vs SPWR vs EVGO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NextNRG Inc. (NXXT) | 100 | 10.3 | -89.7% |
| Energy Vault Holdin… (NRGV) | 100 | 237.9 | +137.9% |
| Microvast Holdings,… (MVST) | 100 | 125.2 | +25.2% |
| SunPower Inc. (SPWR) | 100 | 55.7 | -44.3% |
| EVgo, Inc. (EVGO) | 100 | 54.8 | -45.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NXXT vs NRGV vs MVST vs SPWR vs EVGO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NXXT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- beta 1.73
- Beta 1.73 vs NRGV's 3.08
NRGV has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 340.9%, EPS growth 28.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.8%
- -57.1% 10Y total return vs EVGO's -80.6%
- 340.9% revenue growth vs SPWR's 2.9%
- +447.1% vs NXXT's -89.2%
MVST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- -6.8% margin vs NXXT's -94.3%
- -2.9% ROA vs NXXT's -314.9%, ROIC 0.9% vs -75.3%
SPWR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
EVGO is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.04, Low D/E 27.7%, current ratio 2.19x
- Beta 2.04, current ratio 2.19x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 340.9% revenue growth vs SPWR's 2.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -6.8% margin vs NXXT's -94.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.73 vs NRGV's 3.08 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +447.1% vs NXXT's -89.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -2.9% ROA vs NXXT's -314.9%, ROIC 0.9% vs -75.3% |
NXXT vs NRGV vs MVST vs SPWR vs EVGO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NXXT vs NRGV vs MVST vs SPWR vs EVGO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MVST leads in 2 of 6 categories
NRGV leads 1 • NXXT leads 0 • SPWR leads 0 • EVGO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MVST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MVST is the larger business by revenue, generating $428M annually — 6.5x NXXT's $66M. MVST is the more profitable business, keeping -6.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NXXT's -94.3%. On growth, NXXT holds the edge at +2.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $66M | $217M | $428M | $315M | $418M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$46M | -$72M | $32M | -$6M | -$39M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$62M | -$115M | -$29M | -$42M | -$47M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$17M | -$98M | $56M | -$15M | -$165M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +22.1% | +28.6% | +50.4% | +20.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -73.7% | -35.8% | +1.6% | -2.7% | -26.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -94.3% | -53.0% | -6.8% | -13.2% | -11.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -26.6% | -45.2% | +13.1% | -4.6% | -39.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.3% | +156.4% | -15.0% | -0.2% | +45.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +97.0% | -42.9% | +119.2% | -101.3% | -66.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NXXT and MVST and SPWR and EVGO each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $716M | $611M | $866M | $596M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | $752M | $692M | $1.0B | $552M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.13x | -6.37x | -21.00x | -15.25x | -6.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 31.50x | 5.10x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 99.04x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.08x | 3.52x | 1.43x | 2.80x | 1.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.99x | 7.50x | 1.49x | — | 0.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 10.89x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MVST leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MVST delivers a -7.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-7 in annual profit, vs $-130 for NXXT. EVGO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXXT's 3.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EVGO scores 6/9 vs NXXT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -129.8% | -146.8% | -7.4% | — | -12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.1% | -40.3% | -2.9% | -19.5% | -5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -75.3% | -49.5% | +0.9% | -5.3% | -21.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.6% | -53.7% | +1.2% | -7.2% | -14.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.81x | 1.07x | 0.45x | — | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8M | $36M | $81M | $179M | -$44M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $438,299 | $58M | $105M | $10M | $151M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $95M | $186M | $188M | $107M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.88x | -10.33x | -16.53x | -1.57x | -11.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NRGV leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NRGV five years ago would be worth $4,233 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $971 for NXXT. Over the past 12 months, NRGV leads with a +447.1% total return vs NXXT's -89.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NRGV at 34.0% vs NXXT's -54.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -73.8% | -15.3% | -33.0% | -38.2% | -38.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -89.2% | +447.1% | -2.1% | -42.4% | -48.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.3% | +140.7% | +58.8% | -81.3% | -70.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.3% | -57.7% | -84.4% | -81.3% | -83.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.3% | -57.1% | -80.7% | -81.3% | -80.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -54.0% | +34.0% | +16.7% | -42.8% | -33.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NXXT and NRGV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NXXT is the less volatile stock with a 1.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NRGV's 3.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NRGV currently trades 65.2% from its 52-week high vs NXXT's 10.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.73x | 3.08x | 2.45x | 2.13x | 2.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.46 | $6.35 | $7.12 | $2.27 | $5.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.32 | $0.65 | $1.37 | $0.81 | $1.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +10.2% | +65.2% | +26.5% | +44.9% | +36.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.0 | 53.3 | 54.4 | 45.9 | 40.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.3M | 3.7M | 3.9M | 1.7M | 4.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NXXT as "Buy", NRGV as "Buy", MVST as "Buy", SPWR as "Hold", EVGO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1450.0% upside for SPWR (target: $16) vs -33.6% for NRGV (target: $3).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.00 | $2.75 | $4.80 | $15.81 | $5.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 7 | 6 | 45 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MVST leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NRGV leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
NXXT vs NRGV vs MVST vs SPWR vs EVGO: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NXXT or NRGV or MVST or SPWR or EVGO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is the stronger pick with 340. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 9% for SunPower Inc. (SPWR). Analysts rate NextNRG Inc. (NXXT) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NXXT or NRGV or MVST or SPWR or EVGO?
Over the past 5 years, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) delivered a total return of -57. 7%, compared to -90. 3% for NextNRG Inc. (NXXT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NRGV returned -57. 1% versus NXXT's -90. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NXXT or NRGV or MVST or SPWR or EVGO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NextNRG Inc.
(NXXT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 73β versus Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 08β — meaning NRGV is approximately 78% more volatile than NXXT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, EVgo, Inc. (EVGO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 4% for NextNRG Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NXXT or NRGV or MVST or SPWR or EVGO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is pulling ahead at 340. 9% versus 2. 9% for SunPower Inc. (SPWR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Microvast Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 85. 2% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for SunPower Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EVGO leads at 91. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NXXT or NRGV or MVST or SPWR or EVGO?
Microvast Holdings, Inc.
(MVST) is the more profitable company, earning -6. 8% net margin versus -58. 3% for NextNRG Inc. — meaning it keeps -6. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MVST leads at 1. 6% versus -36. 5% for NRGV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPWR leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is NXXT or NRGV or MVST or SPWR or EVGO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SunPower Inc.
(SPWR) trades at 5. 1x forward P/E versus 31. 5x for Microvast Holdings, Inc. — 26. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPWR: 1450. 0% to $15. 81.
07Which pays a better dividend — NXXT or NRGV or MVST or SPWR or EVGO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is NXXT or NRGV or MVST or SPWR or EVGO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NextNRG Inc.
(NXXT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. SunPower Inc. (SPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NXXT: -90. 3%, SPWR: -81. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NXXT and NRGV and MVST and SPWR and EVGO?
These companies operate in different sectors (NXXT (Utilities) and NRGV (Utilities) and MVST (Industrials) and SPWR (Energy) and EVGO (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NXXT is a small-cap high-growth stock; NRGV is a small-cap high-growth stock; MVST is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPWR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EVGO is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.