Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NYAX vs IIIV vs PRTH vs CWAN vs ACMR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NYAX
Nayax Ltd.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$2.67B
5Y Perf.+205.9%
IIIV
i3 Verticals, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$506M
5Y Perf.+14.4%
PRTH
Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$451M
5Y Perf.+22.2%
CWAN
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$7.21B
5Y Perf.+44.7%
ACMR
ACM Research, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.92B
5Y Perf.+375.1%

NYAX vs IIIV vs PRTH vs CWAN vs ACMR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NYAX logoNYAX
IIIV logoIIIV
PRTH logoPRTH
CWAN logoCWAN
ACMR logoACMR
IndustryInformation Technology ServicesSoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - ApplicationSemiconductors
Market Cap$2.67B$506M$451M$7.21B$3.92B
Revenue (TTM)$404M$223M$953M$826M$901M
Net Income (TTM)$36M$16M$56M$-48M$94M
Gross Margin46.3%60.4%21.4%66.0%44.4%
Operating Margin9.7%0.8%14.8%1.4%12.1%
Forward P/E81.5x20.3x5.8x34.6x29.7x
Total Debt$338M$8M$1.05B$883M$303M
Cash & Equiv.$412M$67M$77M$91M$766M

NYAX vs IIIV vs PRTH vs CWAN vs ACMRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NYAX
IIIV
PRTH
CWAN
ACMR
StockSep 22May 26Return
Nayax Ltd. (NYAX)100305.9+205.9%
i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV)100114.4+14.4%
Priority Technology… (PRTH)100122.2+22.2%
Clearwater Analytic… (CWAN)100144.7+44.7%
ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR)100475.1+375.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NYAX vs IIIV vs PRTH vs CWAN vs ACMR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ACMR leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Nayax Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and operational efficiency and capital deployment. PRTH and CWAN also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
NYAX
Nayax Ltd.
The Growth Play

NYAX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Rev growth 38.0%, EPS growth 7.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.71, current ratio 2.26x
  • Beta 0.71, current ratio 2.26x
  • Beta 0.71 vs ACMR's 3.24
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
IIIV
i3 Verticals, Inc.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, IIIV doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
PRTH
Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
The Income Pick

PRTH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.12
  • Lower P/E (5.8x vs 29.7x)
Best for: income & stability
CWAN
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Leader

CWAN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.

  • 61.9% revenue growth vs IIIV's -7.3%
Best for: growth
ACMR
ACM Research, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

ACMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 30.7% 10Y total return vs NYAX's 158.9%
  • 10.4% margin vs CWAN's -5.8%
  • 0.2% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
  • +195.6% vs IIIV's -13.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCWAN logoCWAN61.9% revenue growth vs IIIV's -7.3%
ValuePRTH logoPRTHLower P/E (5.8x vs 29.7x)
Quality / MarginsACMR logoACMR10.4% margin vs CWAN's -5.8%
Stability / SafetyNYAX logoNYAXBeta 0.71 vs ACMR's 3.24
DividendsACMR logoACMR0.2% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ACMR logoACMR+195.6% vs IIIV's -13.8%
Efficiency (ROA)NYAX logoNYAX5.3% ROA vs CWAN's -1.6%, ROIC 15.2% vs 1.1%

NYAX vs IIIV vs PRTH vs CWAN vs ACMR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NYAXNayax Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

IIIVi3 Verticals, Inc.
FY 2025
License and Service
93.7%$149M
Other Revenue
6.3%$10M
PRTHPriority Technology Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Credit Card, Merchant Discount
74.6%$711M
Money Transmissions Services
16.7%$159M
Outsourced Services And Other Services
7.4%$71M
Product
1.3%$12M
CWANClearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$731M
ACMRACM Research, Inc.
FY 2025
Total Single Wafer and Semi-Critical Cleaning Equipment
69.5%$626M
ECP Front End And Packaging Furnace And Other Technologies
22.1%$200M
Advanced Packaging (exclude ECP), Services & Spares
8.4%$76M

NYAX vs IIIV vs PRTH vs CWAN vs ACMR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNYAXLAGGINGIIIV

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CWAN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

PRTH is the larger business by revenue, generating $953M annually — 4.3x IIIV's $223M. ACMR is the more profitable business, keeping 10.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CWAN's -5.8%. On growth, CWAN holds the edge at +74.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNYAX logoNYAXNayax Ltd.IIIV logoIIIVi3 Verticals, Inc.PRTH logoPRTHPriority Technolo…CWAN logoCWANClearwater Analyt…ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$404M$223M$953M$826M$901M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$65M$31M$204M$94M$126M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$36M$16M$56M-$48M$94M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$32M$10M$75M$152M-$69M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+46.3%+60.4%+21.4%+66.0%+44.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+9.7%+0.8%+14.8%+1.4%+12.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+8.9%+7.3%+5.8%-5.8%+10.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+7.8%+4.7%+7.9%+18.5%-7.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+37.0%-14.6%+8.8%+74.4%+9.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+7.0%-78.0%+3.1%-137.9%-76.1%
CWAN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PRTH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 8.1x trailing earnings, PRTH trades at a 89% valuation discount to NYAX's 70.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRTH's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CWAN's 70.4x.

MetricNYAX logoNYAXNayax Ltd.IIIV logoIIIVi3 Verticals, Inc.PRTH logoPRTHPriority Technolo…CWAN logoCWANClearwater Analyt…ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$2.7B$506M$451M$7.2B$3.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.6B$447M$1.4B$8.0B$3.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS70.93x40.91x8.10x-173.50x43.21x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.81.48x20.30x5.78x34.60x29.68x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.22x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple45.28x14.02x6.95x70.39x27.49x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue6.17x2.37x0.47x9.85x4.35x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share11.79x1.51x3.24x2.06x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF37.75x134.87x6.01x43.85x
PRTH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NYAX leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

NYAX delivers a 17.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-2 for CWAN. IIIV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NYAX's 1.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PRTH scores 6/9 vs ACMR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricNYAX logoNYAXNayax Ltd.IIIV logoIIIVi3 Verticals, Inc.PRTH logoPRTHPriority Technolo…CWAN logoCWANClearwater Analyt…ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+17.5%+3.2%-2.4%+6.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.3%+2.6%+2.6%-1.6%+3.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+15.2%+0.6%+13.4%+1.1%+7.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.5%+0.7%+16.0%+1.4%+6.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–955622
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.46x0.01x0.43x0.16x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$74M-$59M$969M$792M-$463M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$412M$67M$77M$91M$766M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$338M$8M$1.0B$883M$303M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.22x5.21x1.51x0.07x20.44x
NYAX leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ACMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NYAX five years ago would be worth $25,895 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,236 for IIIV. Over the past 12 months, ACMR leads with a +195.6% total return vs IIIV's -13.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACMR at 80.5% vs IIIV's -0.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNYAX logoNYAXNayax Ltd.IIIV logoIIIVi3 Verticals, Inc.PRTH logoPRTHPriority Technolo…CWAN logoCWANClearwater Analyt…ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+39.3%-9.3%+3.6%+0.7%+31.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+73.9%-13.8%-10.4%+6.1%+195.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+290.7%-2.5%+50.5%+65.7%+487.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+158.9%-27.6%-15.9%-4.3%+133.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+158.9%+24.9%-43.8%-4.3%+3065.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+57.5%-0.8%+14.6%+18.3%+80.5%
ACMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NYAX and CWAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NYAX is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACMR's 3.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWAN currently trades 96.9% from its 52-week high vs PRTH's 62.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNYAX logoNYAXNayax Ltd.IIIV logoIIIVi3 Verticals, Inc.PRTH logoPRTHPriority Technolo…CWAN logoCWANClearwater Analyt…ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.71x0.92x2.12x0.80x3.24x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$74.83$33.97$8.89$25.07$71.65
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$37.95$19.89$4.44$15.74$19.26
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.7%+67.4%+62.0%+96.9%+82.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10074.347.853.469.960.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded21K292K252K4.0M1.2M
Evenly matched — NYAX and CWAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — PRTH and ACMR each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: NYAX as "Buy", IIIV as "Buy", PRTH as "Buy", CWAN as "Hold", ACMR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.6% upside for PRTH (target: $11) vs -33.7% for NYAX (target: $48). ACMR is the only dividend payer here at 0.19% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricNYAX logoNYAXNayax Ltd.IIIV logoIIIVi3 Verticals, Inc.PRTH logoPRTHPriority Technolo…CWAN logoCWANClearwater Analyt…ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$48.00$29.00$11.00$24.96$40.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts61451310
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises313
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.11
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+7.4%+2.3%+0.3%+0.2%
Evenly matched — PRTH and ACMR each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CWAN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). PRTH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallNayax Ltd. (NYAX)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NYAX vs IIIV vs PRTH vs CWAN vs ACMR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NYAX or IIIV or PRTH or CWAN or ACMR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.

(CWAN) is the stronger pick with 61. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 3% for i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (5. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nayax Ltd. (NYAX) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NYAX or IIIV or PRTH or CWAN or ACMR?

On trailing P/E, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.

(PRTH) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus Nayax Ltd. at 70. 9x. On forward P/E, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NYAX or IIIV or PRTH or CWAN or ACMR?

Over the past 5 years, Nayax Ltd.

(NYAX) delivered a total return of +158. 9%, compared to -27. 6% for i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACMR returned +30. 7% versus PRTH's -43. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NYAX or IIIV or PRTH or CWAN or ACMR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nayax Ltd.

(NYAX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus ACM Research, Inc. 's 3. 24β — meaning ACMR is approximately 353% more volatile than NYAX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 146% for Nayax Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NYAX or IIIV or PRTH or CWAN or ACMR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.

(CWAN) is pulling ahead at 61. 9% versus -7. 3% for i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nayax Ltd. grew EPS 737. 5% year-over-year, compared to -108. 3% for Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NYAX leads at 35. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NYAX or IIIV or PRTH or CWAN or ACMR?

ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 4% net margin versus -5. 3% for Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRTH leads at 14. 8% versus 1. 9% for IIIV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CWAN leads at 67. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NYAX or IIIV or PRTH or CWAN or ACMR more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.

(PRTH) trades at 5. 8x forward P/E versus 81. 5x for Nayax Ltd. — 75. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRTH: 99. 6% to $11. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NYAX or IIIV or PRTH or CWAN or ACMR?

In this comparison, ACMR (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. NYAX, IIIV, PRTH, CWAN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is NYAX or IIIV or PRTH or CWAN or ACMR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Nayax Ltd.

(NYAX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71), +158. 9% 10Y return). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) carries a higher beta of 2. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NYAX: +158. 9%, PRTH: -43. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NYAX and IIIV and PRTH and CWAN and ACMR?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: NYAX is a small-cap high-growth stock; IIIV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRTH is a small-cap deep-value stock; CWAN is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

NYAX

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 18%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IIIV

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PRTH

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CWAN

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 37%
  • Gross Margin > 39%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACMR

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform NYAX and IIIV and PRTH and CWAN and ACMR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(NYAX: 37.0% · IIIV: -14.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(NYAX: 8.9% · IIIV: 7.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(NYAX: 70.9x · IIIV: 40.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.