REIT - Office
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NYC vs CMCT vs AFCG vs REFI vs SILA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Office
REIT - Specialty
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
NYC vs CMCT vs AFCG vs REFI vs SILA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Office | REIT - Office | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Healthcare Facilities |
| Market Cap | $20M | $6M | $73M | $245M | $1.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $39M | $117M | $6M | $44M | $198M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-21M | $-39M | $-20M | $4.87B | $33M |
| Gross Margin | 6.2% | -10.3% | -76.6% | 95.6% | 87.9% |
| Operating Margin | -168.6% | 7.1% | -124.7% | 18.4% | 34.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 6.4x | 47.0x |
| Total Debt | $403M | $510M | $76M | $98M | $721M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $15M | $39M | $15M | $32M |
NYC vs CMCT vs AFCG vs REFI vs SILA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Strategic … (NYC) | 100 | 84.4 | -15.6% |
| Creative Media & Co… (CMCT) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Advanced Flower Cap… (AFCG) | 100 | 37.0 | -63.0% |
| Chicago Atlantic Re… (REFI) | 100 | 75.7 | -24.3% |
| Sila Realty Trust, … (SILA) | 100 | 144.4 | +44.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NYC vs CMCT vs AFCG vs REFI vs SILA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NYC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CMCT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 100.0% yield, vs SILA's 5.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, AFCG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
REFI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.69, yield 100.0%
- Rev growth 15.2%, EPS growth -10.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.9%
- 15.2% FFO/revenue growth vs AFCG's -39.6%
- Lower P/E (6.4x vs 47.0x)
SILA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 55.9% 10Y total return vs REFI's 24.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.34, Low D/E 54.2%, current ratio 5488.22x
- Beta 0.34, yield 5.2%, current ratio 5488.22x
- Beta 0.34 vs AFCG's 1.86
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.2% FFO/revenue growth vs AFCG's -39.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.4x vs 47.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 109.7% margin vs AFCG's -333.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs AFCG's 1.86 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, vs SILA's 5.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +25.9% vs CMCT's -99.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.5% ROA vs AFCG's -6.4%, ROIC 6.9% vs -4.1% |
NYC vs CMCT vs AFCG vs REFI vs SILA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NYC vs CMCT vs AFCG vs REFI vs SILA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
REFI leads in 3 of 6 categories
SILA leads 1 • NYC leads 0 • CMCT leads 0 • AFCG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REFI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SILA is the larger business by revenue, generating $198M annually — 33.1x AFCG's $6M. REFI is the more profitable business, keeping 109.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AFCG's -3.3%. On growth, AFCG holds the edge at +64.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $39M | $117M | $6M | $44M | $198M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$53M | $35M | -$16M | $8M | $145M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$21M | -$39M | -$20M | $4.9B | $33M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$13M | -$15M | -$24M | $3.2B | $111M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | -10.3% | -76.6% | +95.6% | +87.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -168.6% | +7.1% | -124.7% | +18.4% | +34.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -53.6% | -33.4% | -3.3% | +109.7% | +16.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -33.4% | -12.9% | -3.9% | +71.8% | +56.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +3.6% | +64.7% | -100.0% | +8.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.0% | +97.5% | +16.7% | -51.1% | -55.0% |
Valuation Metrics
REFI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.9x trailing earnings, REFI trades at a 86% valuation discount to SILA's 51.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, REFI's 9.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SILA's 16.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20M | $6M | $73M | $245M | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $413M | $500M | $110M | $328M | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.14x | -0.10x | -3.25x | 6.92x | 50.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 6.41x | 47.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 14.15x | — | 9.12x | 16.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.33x | 0.05x | 2.32x | 3.88x | 8.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.23x | 0.02x | 0.39x | 0.81x | 1.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 6.47x | 0.01x | 15.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
REFI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
REFI delivers a 6.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-30 for NYC. REFI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NYC's 4.71x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SILA scores 7/9 vs CMCT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -29.6% | -13.4% | -11.1% | +6.4% | +2.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.7% | -4.5% | -6.4% | +4.5% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -15.8% | +0.8% | -4.1% | +6.9% | +2.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -20.8% | +1.1% | -5.6% | +9.3% | +3.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.71x | 1.91x | 0.43x | 0.32x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $393M | $494M | $38M | $83M | $689M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $15M | $39M | $15M | $32M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $403M | $510M | $76M | $98M | $721M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -6.22x | 0.03x | -2.15x | 4.77x | 2.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SILA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SILA five years ago would be worth $15,222 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $402 for CMCT. Over the past 12 months, SILA leads with a +25.9% total return vs CMCT's -99.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SILA at 13.7% vs CMCT's -65.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.0% | -98.1% | +10.2% | -1.4% | +31.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -30.7% | -99.0% | -35.5% | -7.9% | +25.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.0% | -95.9% | -20.1% | +25.7% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.1% | -96.0% | -44.6% | +24.7% | +52.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.8% | -59.4% | -42.4% | +24.7% | +55.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.1% | -65.5% | -7.2% | +7.9% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NYC and SILA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NYC is the less volatile stock with a -0.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AFCG's 1.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SILA currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs CMCT's 0.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.26x | 1.20x | 1.86x | 0.69x | 0.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.30 | $1441.00 | $5.87 | $15.20 | $30.63 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.03 | $3.60 | $2.06 | $10.74 | $21.94 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.6% | +0.5% | +52.6% | +76.4% | +99.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.2 | 21.2 | 48.2 | 58.1 | 87.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2K | 3.9M | 235K | 167K | 741K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CMCT and REFI and SILA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: REFI as "Buy", SILA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 20.5% upside for REFI (target: $14) vs -3.0% for SILA (target: $30). For income investors, CMCT offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs SILA's 5.23%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $14.00 | $29.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 6 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +100.0% | +28.1% | +100.0% | +5.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $23.89 | $0.87 | $2045.71 | $1.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | +2.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% |
REFI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SILA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
NYC vs CMCT vs AFCG vs REFI vs SILA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NYC or CMCT or AFCG or REFI or SILA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(REFI) is the stronger pick with 15. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 6% for Advanced Flower Capital Inc. (AFCG). Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI) offers the better valuation at 6. 9x trailing P/E (6. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NYC or CMCT or AFCG or REFI or SILA?
On trailing P/E, Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(REFI) is the cheapest at 6. 9x versus Sila Realty Trust, Inc. at 51. 0x. On forward P/E, Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NYC or CMCT or AFCG or REFI or SILA?
Over the past 5 years, Sila Realty Trust, Inc.
(SILA) delivered a total return of +52. 2%, compared to -96. 0% for Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation (CMCT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SILA returned +55. 9% versus NYC's -93. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NYC or CMCT or AFCG or REFI or SILA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Strategic Investment Co.
(NYC) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 26β versus Advanced Flower Capital Inc. 's 1. 86β — meaning AFCG is approximately -803% more volatile than NYC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 5% for American Strategic Investment Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NYC or CMCT or AFCG or REFI or SILA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(REFI) is pulling ahead at 15. 2% versus -39. 6% for Advanced Flower Capital Inc. (AFCG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation grew EPS 98. 4% year-over-year, compared to -218. 8% for Advanced Flower Capital Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, REFI leads at 8. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NYC or CMCT or AFCG or REFI or SILA?
Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(REFI) is the more profitable company, earning 57. 1% net margin versus -228. 3% for American Strategic Investment Co. — meaning it keeps 57. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: REFI leads at 57. 1% versus -196. 9% for NYC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AFCG leads at 90. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NYC or CMCT or AFCG or REFI or SILA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(REFI) trades at 6. 4x forward P/E versus 47. 0x for Sila Realty Trust, Inc. — 40. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for REFI: 20. 5% to $14. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NYC or CMCT or AFCG or REFI or SILA?
In this comparison, CMCT (100.
0% yield), REFI (100. 0% yield), AFCG (28. 1% yield), SILA (5. 2% yield) pay a dividend. NYC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NYC or CMCT or AFCG or REFI or SILA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sila Realty Trust, Inc.
(SILA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34), 5. 2% yield). Advanced Flower Capital Inc. (AFCG) carries a higher beta of 1. 86 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SILA: +55. 9%, AFCG: -42. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NYC and CMCT and AFCG and REFI and SILA?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NYC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CMCT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; AFCG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; REFI is a small-cap high-growth stock; SILA is a small-cap income-oriented stock. CMCT, AFCG, REFI, SILA pay a dividend while NYC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.