NYT vs IAC vs AMZN vs FOXA

For growth investors, Fox Corporation (FOXA) is the stronger pick with 16.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). Fox Corporation (FOXA) offers the better valuation at 12. 7x trailing P/E (13. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Fox Corporation (FOXA) is the cheapest at 12.

7x versus The New York Times Company at 40. 0x. On forward P/E, Fox Corporation is actually cheaper at 13. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fox Corporation wins at 0. 54x versus The New York Times Company's 1. 91x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, The New York Times Company (NYT) delivered a total return of +94.

5%, compared to -66. 4% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +715. 9% versus FOXA's +29. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The New York Times Company (NYT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

28β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 446% more volatile than NYT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The New York Times Company (NYT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 60% for Fox Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fox Corporation (FOXA) is pulling ahead at 16.

6% versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IAC InterActive Corp. grew EPS 79. 5% year-over-year, compared to 18. 1% for The New York Times Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMZN leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Fox Corporation (FOXA) is the more profitable company, earning 13.

9% net margin versus -4. 3% for IAC InterActive Corp. — meaning it keeps 13. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FOXA leads at 19. 8% versus -4. 1% for IAC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IAC leads at 66. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fox Corporation (FOXA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 54x versus The New York Times Company's 1. 91x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fox Corporation (FOXA) trades at 13. 4x forward P/E versus 107. 5x for IAC InterActive Corp. — 94. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IAC: 16. 4% to $49. 17.

In this comparison, FOXA (1.

0% yield), NYT (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. IAC, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, The New York Times Company (NYT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

28), 0. 8% yield, +598. 4% 10Y return). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NYT: +598. 4%, AMZN: +715. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (NYT (Communication Services) and IAC (Technology) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and FOXA (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: NYT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; IAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; FOXA is a mid-cap high-growth stock. NYT, FOXA pay a dividend while IAC, AMZN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.