Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

OABI vs IMVT vs HALO vs RCUS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
OABI
OmniAb, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$167M
5Y Perf.-84.9%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.53B
5Y Perf.+213.2%
HALO
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.68B
5Y Perf.+60.3%
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.50B
5Y Perf.-28.9%

OABI vs IMVT vs HALO vs RCUS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
OABI logoOABI
IMVT logoIMVT
HALO logoHALO
RCUS logoRCUS
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$167M$5.53B$7.68B$2.50B
Revenue (TTM)$29M$0.00$1.40B$236M
Net Income (TTM)$-54M$-464M$317M$-369M
Gross Margin82.8%81.9%90.7%
Operating Margin-173.0%58.4%-168.6%
Forward P/E8.1x
Total Debt$20M$98K$0.00$99M
Cash & Equiv.$26M$714M$134M$222M

OABI vs IMVT vs HALO vs RCUSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

OABI
IMVT
HALO
RCUS
StockSep 21May 26Return
OmniAb, Inc. (OABI)10015.1-84.9%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)100313.2+213.2%
Halozyme Therapeuti… (HALO)100160.3+60.3%
Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS)10071.1-28.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: OABI vs IMVT vs HALO vs RCUS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HALO leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Arcus Biosciences, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
OABI
OmniAb, Inc.
The Specific-Use Pick

OABI plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: healthcare exposure
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 11.16x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
HALO
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
The Income Pick

HALO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • beta 0.56
  • Rev growth 37.6%, EPS growth -25.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.4%
  • 5.7% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 173.6%
  • Beta 0.56, current ratio 4.66x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

RCUS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.

  • +209.6% vs HALO's -7.1%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHALO logoHALO37.6% revenue growth vs OABI's -29.3%
Quality / MarginsHALO logoHALO22.7% margin vs OABI's -187.6%
Stability / SafetyHALO logoHALOBeta 0.56 vs RCUS's 1.95
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)RCUS logoRCUS+209.6% vs HALO's -7.1%
Efficiency (ROA)HALO logoHALO12.5% ROA vs IMVT's -44.1%

OABI vs IMVT vs HALO vs RCUS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

OABIOmniAb, Inc.
FY 2025
Service
89.2%$7M
Royalty
10.8%$878,000
IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

HALOHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2025
Royalty
53.6%$868M
Product
23.3%$376M
Collaborative Agreements
9.4%$152M
Bulk rHuPH20
8.2%$133M
Sales-based milestone
4.3%$70M
Upfront Fees
1.1%$18M
RCUSArcus Biosciences, Inc.
FY 2025
License And Development Services
87.4%$221M
Development Services
6.7%$17M
R&D Services
3.2%$8M
License
2.8%$7M

OABI vs IMVT vs HALO vs RCUS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHALOLAGGINGRCUS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

HALO and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $1.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. HALO is the more profitable business, keeping 22.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OABI's -187.6%. On growth, OABI holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricOABI logoOABIOmniAb, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$29M$0$1.4B$236M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$33M-$487M$945M-$391M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$54M-$464M$317M-$369M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$26M-$423M$645M-$489M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+82.8%+81.9%+90.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-173.0%+58.4%-168.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-187.6%+22.7%-156.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-89.9%+46.2%-2.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.5%+51.6%-39.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+64.7%+19.7%-2.1%+10.5%
HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — OABI and IMVT and HALO each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricOABI logoOABIOmniAb, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…
Market CapShares × price$167M$5.5B$7.7B$2.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$162M$4.8B$7.5B$2.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.58x-9.97x25.46x-7.54x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.09x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.11x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.34x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue8.96x5.50x10.11x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.63x5.83x165.47x4.22x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.91x
Evenly matched — OABI and IMVT and HALO each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HALO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

HALO delivers a 6.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-69 for RCUS. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RCUS's 0.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HALO scores 5/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricOABI logoOABIOmniAb, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-20.3%-47.1%+6.5%-69.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-18.1%-44.1%+12.5%-35.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-19.7%+73.4%-64.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-24.0%-66.1%+38.2%-42.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92250
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.08x0.00x0.16x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$5M-$714M-$134M-$123M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$26M$714M$134M$222M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$20M$98,000$0$99M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense46.08x-13.38x
HALO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $16,241 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,506 for OABI. Over the past 12 months, RCUS leads with a +209.6% total return vs HALO's -7.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HALO at 29.1% vs OABI's -24.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricOABI logoOABIOmniAb, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-21.8%+5.1%-7.3%+6.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-3.9%+96.1%-7.1%+209.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-57.4%+40.9%+115.3%+24.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-84.9%+62.4%+37.0%-18.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-84.9%+173.6%+570.7%+45.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-24.8%+12.1%+29.1%+7.7%
HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — IMVT and HALO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HALO is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCUS's 1.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs OABI's 63.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricOABI logoOABIOmniAb, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.51x1.37x0.56x1.95x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.30$30.09$82.22$28.72
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.22$13.36$47.50$7.06
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+63.9%+90.5%+79.3%+86.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10042.560.252.460.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded428K1.4M1.4M1.2M
Evenly matched — IMVT and HALO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: OABI as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", HALO as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 172.1% upside for OABI (target: $4) vs 20.2% for HALO (target: $78).

MetricOABI logoOABIOmniAb, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$4.00$45.50$78.33$30.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts9232718
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+4.5%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

HALO leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.

Best OverallHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

OABI vs IMVT vs HALO vs RCUS: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is OABI or IMVT or HALO or RCUS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) is the stronger pick with 37. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -29. 3% for OmniAb, Inc. (OABI). Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO) offers the better valuation at 25. 5x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate OmniAb, Inc. (OABI) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — OABI or IMVT or HALO or RCUS?

Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.

(IMVT) delivered a total return of +62. 4%, compared to -84. 9% for OmniAb, Inc. (OABI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HALO returned +570. 7% versus OABI's -84. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — OABI or IMVT or HALO or RCUS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus Arcus Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 95β — meaning RCUS is approximately 250% more volatile than HALO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 16% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — OABI or IMVT or HALO or RCUS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) is pulling ahead at 37. 6% versus -29. 3% for OmniAb, Inc. (OABI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: OmniAb, Inc. grew EPS 6. 6% year-over-year, compared to -45. 2% for Immunovant, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCUS leads at 30. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — OABI or IMVT or HALO or RCUS?

Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 7% net margin versus -347. 0% for OmniAb, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HALO leads at 58. 4% versus -383. 1% for OABI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCUS leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is OABI or IMVT or HALO or RCUS more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OABI: 172.

1% to $4. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — OABI or IMVT or HALO or RCUS?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is OABI or IMVT or HALO or RCUS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), +570. 7% 10Y return). Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a higher beta of 1. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HALO: +570. 7%, RCUS: +45. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between OABI and IMVT and HALO and RCUS?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: OABI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HALO is a small-cap high-growth stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

OABI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 123%
  • Gross Margin > 49%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IMVT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HALO

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 25%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RCUS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 54%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.