OBA
Oxley Bridge Acquisition Limited
Shell Companies
Market Cap$56K
5Y Perf.+1.5%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
OBA vs C
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
C
Citigroup Inc.
Banks - Diversified
Market Cap$225.59B
5Y Perf.+47.5%
OBA vs C — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | OBA | C |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $56K | $225.59B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $170.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-117.00 | $14.69B |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 10.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.6x |
| Total Debt | $133K | $590.56B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $0.00 | $276.53B |
OBA vs C — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
OBA
C
| Stock | Jun 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oxley Bridge Acquis… (OBA) | 100 | 101.5 | +1.5% |
| Citigroup Inc. (C) | 100 | 147.5 | +47.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OBA vs C
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: C leads in 3 of 3 categories, making it the strongest pick for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
OBA
Oxley Bridge Acquisition Limited
The Financial Play
In this particular matchup, OBA is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
Best for: financial services exposure
C
Citigroup Inc.
The Banking Pick
C carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 236.6% 10Y total return vs OBA's 1.8%
- 2.1% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
- +87.2% vs OBA's +1.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends | C | 2.1% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | C | +87.2% vs OBA's +1.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | C | 0.6% ROA vs OBA's -0.1% |
OBA vs C — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
OBA vs C — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLOBALAGGINGC
CCitigroup Inc.
1leads
OBAOxley Bridge Acquisit…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
—
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
OBA1/1
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
C6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
OBA2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
C and OBA operate at a comparable scale, with $170.7B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | OBAOxley Bridge Acqu… | CCitigroup Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $170.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $24.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $14.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$76.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +41.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +10.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +7.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -15.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +23.2% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Valuation Metrics
OBA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | OBAOxley Bridge Acqu… | CCitigroup Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $55,990 | $225.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $188,842 | $539.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -477.93x | 21.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 25.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
OBA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — OBA and C each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), C scores 5/9 vs OBA's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | OBAOxley Bridge Acqu… | CCitigroup Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +6.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.1% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +1.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +3.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.82x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $132,852 | $314.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $0 | $276.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $132,852 | $590.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.24x |
Evenly matched — OBA and C each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
C leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in C five years ago would be worth $18,638 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,180 for OBA. Over the past 12 months, C leads with a +87.2% total return vs OBA's +1.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors C at 43.1% vs OBA's 0.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | OBAOxley Bridge Acqu… | CCitigroup Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.0% | +9.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.8% | +87.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.8% | +193.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.8% | +86.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.8% | +236.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.6% | +43.1% |
C leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OBA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OBA is the less volatile stock with a -0.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than C's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OBA currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs C's 95.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | OBAOxley Bridge Acqu… | CCitigroup Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.00x | 1.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.22 | $135.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.93 | $69.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +95.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.8 | 56.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 24K | 11.5M |
OBA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
C is the only dividend payer here at 2.12% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | OBAOxley Bridge Acqu… | CCitigroup Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $140.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.73 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.3% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
OBA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). C leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallOxley Bridge Acquisition Li… (OBA)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
OBA vs C: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OBA or C a better buy right now?
Citigroup Inc.
(C) offers the better valuation at 21. 7x trailing P/E (11. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citigroup Inc. (C) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OBA or C?
Over the past 5 years, Citigroup Inc.
(C) delivered a total return of +86. 4%, compared to +1. 8% for Oxley Bridge Acquisition Limited (OBA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: C returned +228. 5% versus OBA's +1. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OBA or C?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Oxley Bridge Acquisition Limited (OBA) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
00β versus Citigroup Inc. 's 1. 46β — meaning C is approximately -37487% more volatile than OBA relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — OBA or C?
Citigroup Inc.
(C) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 4% net margin versus 0. 0% for Oxley Bridge Acquisition Limited — meaning it keeps 7. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: C leads at 10. 0% versus 0. 0% for OBA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — C leads at 41. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — OBA or C?
In this comparison, C (2.
1% yield) pays a dividend. OBA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is OBA or C better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Oxley Bridge Acquisition Limited (OBA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
00)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OBA: +1. 6%, C: +228. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between OBA and C?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
C pays a dividend while OBA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.