OCCI vs ARCC vs GBDC vs TPVG vs SLRC

For growth investors, OFS Credit Company, Inc.

(OCCI) is the stronger pick with 117. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 24. 8% for SLR Investment Corp. (SLRC). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (6. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 9x versus Ares Capital Corporation at 10. 2x. On forward P/E, OFS Credit Company, Inc. is actually cheaper at 2. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: SLR Investment Corp. wins at 0. 24x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 41x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) delivered a total return of +47.

0%, compared to -14. 2% for OFS Credit Company, Inc. (OCCI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARCC returned +139. 2% versus OCCI's -7. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Golub Capital BDC, Inc.

(GBDC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 64β versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 0. 83β — meaning TPVG is approximately 30% more volatile than GBDC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, OFS Credit Company, Inc. (OCCI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 74% versus 133% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), OFS Credit Company, Inc.

(OCCI) is pulling ahead at 117. 0% versus 24. 8% for SLR Investment Corp. (SLRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. grew EPS 48. 8% year-over-year, compared to -143. 3% for OFS Credit Company, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus -24. 4% for OFS Credit Company, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GBDC leads at 78. 9% versus -5. 5% for OCCI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TPVG leads at 83. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, SLR Investment Corp. (SLRC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 24x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 41x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, OFS Credit Company, Inc. (OCCI) trades at 2. 3x forward P/E versus 9. 9x for Ares Capital Corporation — 7. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPVG: 49. 4% to $8. 95.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

OFS Credit Company, Inc. (OCCI) offers the highest yield at 35. 3%, versus 2. 0% for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Golub Capital BDC, Inc.

(GBDC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 64), 10. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GBDC: +61. 0%, TPVG: +93. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.