OCFT
OneConnect Financial Technology Co., Ltd.
Software - Application
Market Cap$308M
5Y Perf.-93.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
OCFT vs TIGR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
TIGR
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A
Financial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$676M
5Y Perf.+223.7%
OCFT vs TIGR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | OCFT | TIGR |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $308M | $676M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.63B | $392M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-677M | $118M |
| Gross Margin | 29.9% | 65.0% |
| Operating Margin | -18.6% | 35.6% |
| Forward P/E | 4.7x | 7.3x |
| Total Debt | $44M | $180M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.95B | $394M |
OCFT vs TIGR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
OCFT
TIGR
| Stock | May 20 | Nov 25 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| OneConnect Financia… (OCFT) | 100 | 6.3 | -93.7% |
| UP Fintech Holding … (TIGR) | 100 | 323.7 | +223.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OCFT vs TIGR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: OCFT and TIGR are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
OCFT
OneConnect Financial Technology Co., Ltd.
The Income Pick
OCFT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.33
- Lower volatility, beta 0.33, Low D/E 1.7%, current ratio 2.36x
- Beta 0.33, current ratio 2.36x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
TIGR
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A
The Banking Pick
TIGR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 43.7%, EPS growth 71.4%
- -35.3% 10Y total return vs OCFT's -92.1%
- 43.7% NII/revenue growth vs OCFT's -38.7%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TIGR | 43.7% NII/revenue growth vs OCFT's -38.7% |
| Value | OCFT | Lower P/E (4.7x vs 7.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | TIGR | 15.5% margin vs OCFT's -41.5% |
| Stability / Safety | OCFT | Beta 0.33 vs TIGR's 2.02, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | OCFT | +27.7% vs TIGR's -25.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TIGR | 1.6% ROA vs OCFT's -18.2%, ROIC 13.8% vs -18.0% |
OCFT vs TIGR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2024
OCFT vs TIGR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTIGRLAGGINGOCFT
OCFTOneConnect Financial …
2leads
TIGRUP Fintech Holding Lt…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs OCFTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
TIGR5/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
OCFT4/4
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
TIGR6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TIGR4/5
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
OCFT2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TIGR leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OCFT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.6B annually — 4.2x TIGR's $392M. TIGR is the more profitable business, keeping 15.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OCFT's -41.5%.
| Metric | OCFTOneConnect Financ… | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $392M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$262M | $225M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$677M | $118M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$192M | $673M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.9% | +65.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -18.6% | +35.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -41.5% | +15.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -11.8% | +2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -37.4% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -139.1% | +12.4% |
TIGR leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
OCFT leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | OCFTOneConnect Financ… | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $308M | $676M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$1.6B | $462M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.63x | 19.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.69x | 7.32x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 3.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.14x | 1.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.11x | 1.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 0.82x |
OCFT leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TIGR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TIGR delivers a 17.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-28 for OCFT. OCFT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TIGR's 0.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TIGR scores 6/9 vs OCFT's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | OCFTOneConnect Financ… | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -28.1% | +17.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -18.2% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -18.0% | +13.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.0% | +18.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.9B | -$214M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.9B | $394M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $44M | $180M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -38.58x | 3.26x |
TIGR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TIGR leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TIGR five years ago would be worth $4,043 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $566 for OCFT. Over the past 12 months, OCFT leads with a +27.7% total return vs TIGR's -25.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TIGR at 33.7% vs OCFT's 16.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | OCFTOneConnect Financ… | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | -33.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.7% | -25.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.7% | +139.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.3% | -59.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.1% | -35.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.9% | +33.7% |
TIGR leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OCFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OCFT is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TIGR's 2.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OCFT currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs TIGR's 51.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | OCFTOneConnect Financ… | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.33x | 2.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.92 | $13.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.05 | $5.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +51.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.7 | 46.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 2.3M |
OCFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates OCFT as "Hold" and TIGR as "Sell". Consensus price targets imply -31.7% upside for TIGR (target: $5) vs -98.5% for OCFT (target: $0).
| Metric | OCFTOneConnect Financ… | TIGRUP Fintech Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Sell |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $0.12 | $4.73 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
TIGR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OCFT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
Best OverallUP Fintech Holding Ltd. Spo… (TIGR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
OCFT vs TIGR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OCFT or TIGR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is the stronger pick with 43. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -38. 7% for OneConnect Financial Technology Co. , Ltd. (OCFT). UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) offers the better valuation at 19. 3x trailing P/E (7. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate OneConnect Financial Technology Co. , Ltd. (OCFT) a "Hold" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OCFT or TIGR?
On forward P/E, OneConnect Financial Technology Co.
, Ltd. is actually cheaper at 4. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OCFT or TIGR?
Over the past 5 years, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) delivered a total return of -59. 6%, compared to -94. 3% for OneConnect Financial Technology Co. , Ltd. (OCFT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TIGR returned -35. 3% versus OCFT's -92. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OCFT or TIGR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), OneConnect Financial Technology Co.
, Ltd. (OCFT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 33β versus UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A's 2. 02β — meaning TIGR is approximately 518% more volatile than OCFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, OneConnect Financial Technology Co. , Ltd. (OCFT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 27% for UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OCFT or TIGR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is pulling ahead at 43. 7% versus -38. 7% for OneConnect Financial Technology Co. , Ltd. (OCFT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A grew EPS 71. 4% year-over-year, compared to -27. 3% for OneConnect Financial Technology Co. , Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OCFT or TIGR?
UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus -20. 4% for OneConnect Financial Technology Co. , Ltd. — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TIGR leads at 35. 6% versus -13. 5% for OCFT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TIGR leads at 65. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OCFT or TIGR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, OneConnect Financial Technology Co.
, Ltd. (OCFT) trades at 4. 7x forward P/E versus 7. 3x for UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A — 2. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TIGR: -31. 7% to $4. 73.
08Which pays a better dividend — OCFT or TIGR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is OCFT or TIGR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, OneConnect Financial Technology Co.
, Ltd. (OCFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33)). UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OCFT: -92. 1%, TIGR: -35. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OCFT and TIGR?
These companies operate in different sectors (OCFT (Technology) and TIGR (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OCFT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TIGR is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(OCFT: -37.4% · TIGR: 43.7%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.