Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
OCS vs DBVT vs ALKS vs RCKT vs ACAD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
OCS vs DBVT vs ALKS vs RCKT vs ACAD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.89B | $1690.08T | $5.83B | $396M | $3.84B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $504K | $0.00 | $1.56B | $0.00 | $1.10B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-104M | $-168M | $153M | $-209M | $376M |
| Gross Margin | -28.6% | — | 65.4% | — | 91.5% |
| Operating Margin | -155.4% | — | 12.3% | — | 7.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 24.5x | — | 55.6x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $22M | $70M | $25M | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $28M | $194M | $1.12B | $78M | $178M |
OCS vs DBVT vs ALKS vs RCKT vs ACAD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oculis Holding AG (OCS) | 100 | 336.5 | +236.5% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 33.7 | -66.3% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 154.3 | +54.3% |
| Rocket Pharmaceutic… (RCKT) | 100 | 8.5 | -91.5% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 100.3 | +0.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OCS vs DBVT vs ALKS vs RCKT vs ACAD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OCS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 236.5% 10Y total return vs ALKS's -12.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.79, Low D/E 1.6%, current ratio 2.37x
- Beta 0.79 vs DBVT's 1.26, lower leverage
DBVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +100.5% vs RCKT's -48.4%
ALKS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.00
- Lower P/E (24.5x vs 55.6x)
RCKT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 19.7% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
ACAD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 11.9%, EPS growth 68.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.5%
- Beta 1.11, current ratio 3.83x
- 34.3% margin vs OCS's -206.5%
- 26.2% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.7% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (24.5x vs 55.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.3% margin vs OCS's -206.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.79 vs DBVT's 1.26, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +100.5% vs RCKT's -48.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
OCS vs DBVT vs ALKS vs RCKT vs ACAD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
OCS vs DBVT vs ALKS vs RCKT vs ACAD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALKS leads in 3 of 6 categories
OCS leads 2 • DBVT leads 0 • RCKT leads 0 • ACAD leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALKS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALKS and RCKT operate at a comparable scale, with $1.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OCS's -206.5%. On growth, ALKS holds the edge at +28.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $504,000 | $0 | $1.6B | $0 | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$78M | -$112M | $212M | -$208M | $96M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$104M | -$168M | $153M | -$209M | $376M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$61M | -$151M | $392M | -$180M | $212M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -28.6% | — | +65.4% | — | +91.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -155.4% | — | +12.3% | — | +7.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -206.5% | — | +9.8% | — | +34.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -121.8% | — | +25.1% | — | +19.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +28.2% | — | +9.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.3% | +91.5% | -4.1% | +25.0% | -81.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ALKS leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.8x trailing earnings, ACAD trades at a 60% valuation discount to ALKS's 24.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ALKS's 17.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACAD's 26.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.9B | $1690.08T | $5.8B | $396M | $3.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.9B | $1690.08T | $4.8B | $343M | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -12.01x | -0.75x | 24.47x | -1.81x | 9.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 55.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 17.01x | — | 26.71x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2144.98x | — | 3.95x | — | 3.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 14.02x | 0.65x | 3.25x | 1.46x | 3.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 12.14x | — | 36.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. OCS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DBVT's 0.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALKS scores 7/9 vs RCKT's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -81.7% | -130.2% | +8.8% | -70.8% | +35.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -61.8% | -89.0% | +5.4% | -59.6% | +26.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -106.8% | — | +18.9% | -62.4% | +10.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -85.4% | -145.7% | +14.2% | -58.1% | +10.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.13x | 0.04x | 0.09x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$27M | -$172M | -$1.0B | -$53M | -$126M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $28M | $194M | $1.1B | $78M | $178M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $22M | $70M | $25M | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -117.78x | -189.82x | 32.30x | -41.65x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OCS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OCS five years ago would be worth $33,650 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $837 for RCKT. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +100.5% total return vs RCKT's -48.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OCS at 46.3% vs RCKT's -44.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +63.2% | +3.6% | +23.8% | +4.9% | -14.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +74.5% | +100.5% | +15.2% | -48.4% | +32.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +213.2% | +18.1% | +13.2% | -83.0% | +3.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +236.5% | -68.3% | +61.7% | -91.6% | +6.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +236.5% | -87.1% | -12.0% | -91.4% | -23.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +46.3% | +5.7% | +4.2% | -44.6% | +1.3% |
Risk & Volatility
OCS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OCS is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DBVT's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OCS currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs RCKT's 49.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 1.26x | 1.00x | 1.21x | 1.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.76 | $26.18 | $36.60 | $7.39 | $27.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.00 | $7.53 | $25.17 | $2.19 | $14.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +75.3% | +95.6% | +49.1% | +80.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.7 | 47.4 | 60.5 | 48.4 | 53.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 364K | 252K | 2.2M | 3.5M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OCS as "Buy", DBVT as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy", RCKT as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 134.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 31.5% for ALKS (target: $46).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $50.00 | $46.33 | $46.00 | $5.00 | $34.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 15 | 28 | 19 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ALKS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). OCS leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
OCS vs DBVT vs ALKS vs RCKT vs ACAD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OCS or DBVT or ALKS or RCKT or ACAD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the stronger pick with 11. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (55. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Oculis Holding AG (OCS) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OCS or DBVT or ALKS or RCKT or ACAD?
On trailing P/E, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the cheapest at 9. 8x versus Alkermes plc at 24. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OCS or DBVT or ALKS or RCKT or ACAD?
Over the past 5 years, Oculis Holding AG (OCS) delivered a total return of +236.
5%, compared to -91. 6% for Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RCKT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OCS returned +236. 5% versus RCKT's -91. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OCS or DBVT or ALKS or RCKT or ACAD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Oculis Holding AG (OCS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
79β versus DBV Technologies S. A. 's 1. 26β — meaning DBVT is approximately 59% more volatile than OCS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Oculis Holding AG (OCS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 13% for DBV Technologies S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OCS or DBVT or ALKS or RCKT or ACAD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is pulling ahead at 11. 9% versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. grew EPS 68. 4% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACAD leads at 27. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OCS or DBVT or ALKS or RCKT or ACAD?
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -125. 0% for Oculis Holding AG — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALKS leads at 17. 2% versus -106. 7% for OCS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACAD leads at 91. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OCS or DBVT or ALKS or RCKT or ACAD more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 134.
8% to $46. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — OCS or DBVT or ALKS or RCKT or ACAD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is OCS or DBVT or ALKS or RCKT or ACAD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Oculis Holding AG (OCS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
79), +236. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OCS: +236. 5%, DBVT: -87. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OCS and DBVT and ALKS and RCKT and ACAD?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OCS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; ALKS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.